wink
His amps are made out of recycled beer cans
and his source from tomatos.
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2009
- Posts
- 20,312
- Likes
- 3,656
There will always be differences as manufacturing is not a perfect art.
There will always be differences as manufacturing is not a perfect art.
It has been documented that products made on Monday mornings and Friday afternoons have the highest percentage of faults and failures of daily production.
Some would say ANY RS-1, but that is a bit severe (Like the treble of Grado's to some ears)
Very true wink, in this case with the HD-800 sometimes those manufacturing differences are audible.
indeed a difference between units.
i have
291xx
159xx
122xx
So - how do they sound relative to each other?
So - how do they sound relative to each other?
THE NEW ONE
2014.3.29 PRODUCTION S/N 291XX I HAVE THEM FROM 22.5.2014 IS NEW .
TODAY IT IS VERY GOOD FULL CALER
VERY GOOD IN ALL SPCTERUM HIGH/MID/BASS
2012 FROM 27.8.2013 2TH HAND S/N 159XX VERY FLAT
2011 FROM 6.7.2014 2TH HAND S/N 123XX OPEN ON HIGH BIG SOUNDSTEGE
2014 A BIT LUDER IS THE S/N 291XX ALSO
HAS VERY FULL SOUND HAVEY BASS MIDS ARE FULL HIGHS ARE VERY GOOD BUT NOT
AS 2012/2014 SOUND ARE 123XX IS 2011 IT HAS MORE 6KHZ UP VERY OPEN LAREG SOUND STEGE 9.5
....
2012 IS 159XX 14/2/2012
HAVE LESS LOUD LESS 6KHZ VERY FLAT VERY! BASS IS FAIR MIDS VERY GOOD .
VERY VERY LAREG SOUNDSTEG 2011/2012 WOWֱֱֱ!!! 10 IS 159XX
2014 LESS WIDE BY 1-10 IS 9
GET BATER AND BATER FROM THER WAER NEW.
FOR THE NEW ONE BUT FULL SOUND VREY DEFERNT FROM
2012 1-10 IS 10 SOUNDSTEGE
2011 1-10 IS 9.5
2012 159XX IS SO WELL IN EVERTING MY MOST IN USE FOR ALL DAYS
ALSO MY REFERANS VERY EASY ON MY EAR,S LIKE STAX ELCTROSTATIC RAELY!! +BCL+SONY XA50ES IS
THE 159XX FROM 2012
THE NEW ONE IS FOR VERY GOOD RCORDING FROM 50/60S RCA/ EMI/DGG/CBS
BERNSTIN
ORMANDY
DECCA SOUND
SO ON +LUXMAN P-1U+SA11 S1 IS WOW!!!
OR MARANTZ CDA-94 FOR ITS SOUND FROM 1987 BELOW AWAY MOST NEW DAC,S TODAY IN EVERTING
1987 Marantz CDA-94 and a transport DVP-S9000ES -
and recording of Bernstein 1958 St. George Hotel was recorded by Columbia -Stravinsky Firebird
Marantz with a dedicated headphone amplifier - rare
see her
http://www.thevintageknob.org/marantz-CDA-94.html
http://www.thevintageknob.org/marantz-CDA-94.html
http://www.thevintageknob.org/philips-DAC960.html
http://www.thevintageknob.org/philips-DAC960.html FOR THE HEADPHONES AMP AS THE CDA-94 MARANTZ IDENTICAL
Appeared this way open sound Sound Stage and wide open deep you almost forget that you are listening to headphones -that were Notig Lake Marantz amplifier-pearl within the world of Audiophile+HD800 SOUND WOW!!!!
THE 2011 HD800 IS VERY CLER MIDS HIGH TERBAL
BASS NOT STRONG AS 2014 BUT CLOSE TO IT.
TO USE IN VERY CLOSE BUT / UN CLAER FOGIE RECORDING 1970S TO TODAY EMI -TELARC.
REVEL THINGS ON CD THAT IT IS NOT VERY OPEN. BUT ALL THE BAD AS BOUNS HISS ......
THE
SA-11 S1+LUXMAN P-1U IN XLR INPUT IS VERY GOOD ONE. COMBO+291XX FROM 2014
QURLTIUM BLAK XLR{350GBP+}-
ALL 3 HD 800 HAVE 3 Types OF SOUND
HD800 FROM S/N 308XX IS SO GOOD IN OPEN WIDE VERY GOOD BASS EXCLENT - THIS ONE IS FROM A FERND
THE NEW ONE
2014.3.29 PRODUCTION S/N 291XX I HAVE THEM FROM 22.5.2014 IS NEW .
TODAY IT IS VERY GOOD FULL CALER
VERY GOOD IN ALL SPCTERUM HIGH/MID/BASS
2012 FROM 27.8.2013 2TH HAND S/N 159XX VERY FLAT
2011 FROM 6.7.2014 2TH HAND S/N 123XX OPEN ON HIGH BIG SOUNDSTEGE
2014 A BIT LUDER IS THE S/N 291XX ALSO
HAS VERY FULL SOUND HAVEY BASS MIDS ARE FULL HIGHS ARE VERY GOOD BUT NOT
AS 2012/2014 SOUND ARE 123XX IS 2011 IT HAS MORE 6KHZ UP VERY OPEN LAREG SOUND STEGE 9.5
....
2012 IS 159XX 14/2/2012
HAVE LESS LOUD LESS 6KHZ VERY FLAT VERY! BASS IS FAIR MIDS VERY GOOD .
VERY VERY LAREG SOUNDSTEG 2011/2012 WOWֱֱֱ!!! 10 IS 159XX
2014 LESS WIDE BY 1-10 IS 9
GET BATER AND BATER FROM THER WAER NEW.
FOR THE NEW ONE BUT FULL SOUND VREY DEFERNT FROM
2012 1-10 IS 10 SOUNDSTEGE
2011 1-10 IS 9.5
2012 159XX IS SO WELL IN EVERTING MY MOST IN USE FOR ALL DAYS
ALSO MY REFERANS VERY EASY ON MY EAR,S LIKE STAX ELCTROSTATIC RAELY!! +BCL+SONY XA50ES IS
THE 159XX FROM 2012
THE NEW ONE IS FOR VERY GOOD RCORDING FROM 50/60S RCA/ EMI/DGG/CBS
BERNSTIN
ORMANDY
DECCA SOUND
SO ON +LUXMAN P-1U+SA11 S1 IS WOW!!!
OR MARANTZ CDA-94 FOR ITS SOUND FROM 1987 BELOW AWAY MOST NEW DAC,S TODAY IN EVERTING
1987 Marantz CDA-94 and a transport DVP-S9000ES -
and recording of Bernstein 1958 St. George Hotel was recorded by Columbia -Stravinsky Firebird
Marantz with a dedicated headphone amplifier - rare
see her
http://www.thevintageknob.org/marantz-CDA-94.html
http://www.thevintageknob.org/marantz-CDA-94.html
http://www.thevintageknob.org/philips-DAC960.html
http://www.thevintageknob.org/philips-DAC960.html FOR THE HEADPHONES AMP AS THE CDA-94 MARANTZ IDENTICAL
Appeared this way open sound Sound Stage and wide open deep you almost forget that you are listening to headphones -that were Notig Lake Marantz amplifier-pearl within the world of Audiophile+HD800 SOUND WOW!!!!
THE 2011 HD800 IS VERY CLER MIDS HIGH TERBAL
BASS NOT STRONG AS 2014 BUT CLOSE TO IT.
TO USE IN VERY CLOSE BUT / UN CLAER FOGIE RECORDING 1970S TO TODAY EMI -TELARC.
REVEL THINGS ON CD THAT IT IS NOT VERY OPEN. BUT ALL THE BAD AS BOUNS HISS ......
THE
SA-11 S1+LUXMAN P-1U IN XLR INPUT IS VERY GOOD ONE. COMBO+291XX FROM 2014
QURLTIUM BLAK XLR{350GBP+}-
ALL 3 HD 800 HAVE 3 Types OF SOUND
HD800 FROM S/N 308XX IS SO GOOD IN OPEN WIDE VERY GOOD BASS EXCLENT - THIS ONE IS FROM A FERND
So you have 3 sets - because they are significantly different.
When I first compared my two sets (didn't intend to keep both..) - I thougt - "hey - it is actually not insane to keep them both..."
My 16XXX is sounding very neutral and might be called flat wrt frequency response, but not in terms of the soundstage - that i superb. This corresponds to the your impressions of your 159XX.
Your 123XX is descriebed as "open" and with extra boost at 6kHz. This corresponds to the first HD800 I owned years ago - which I sold because of fatigue - and this might correspond to the 6kHz peak yao are descriebing.
My 28XXX is louder, fuller and warmer. This corresponds to the your impressions of your 29XXX
So.....just speculating here on a very low dat sample it seems like there is indications of early this:
- early models have more treble intensity, might be fatiguing to some
- later models were very neutral
- newer models are warmer and fuller sounding.
Does this rhyme with other peoples experience?