fewtch
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2003
- Posts
- 9,559
- Likes
- 37
Quote:
Fair enough on the Grados... just offering my opinion after about 5 minutes of listening in a noisy environment to maybe 2 or 3 different sources -- so my comment should very much be taken in a "for whatever it's worth" sort of context.
Is there actually a category "DJ'ing headphones?" I know there are cans marketed & sold as good for studio use, mastering, DJ'ing, etc. There's a certain sound I associate with a lot of headphones that are marketed for those kinds of uses (the Sony 7506 is a classic example), and it seems they're almost always closed or semi-closed for isolation from external noise. Aside from measurable dips/peaks in frequency response, I'm not sure neutrality and accuracy can be objectively quantified.
As an aside, on the whole 'objectivism vs subjectivism' thing -- I often find myself reading debates on the Net with amusement, but rarely have anything to add myself... I'm sitting on the fence, sometimes leaning one way and sometimes another. Clearly there's equipment that measures well and sounds poor, and also equipment that measures poorly but sounds good. I tend to use measurements as a guide (price is not a very good guide, particularly at the high end), but my ears are the final judge. Even something that's almost universally regarded as neutral and accurate isn't worth it to me if I don't enjoy listening.
Anyway... thanks again for hosting a memorable meet, and for helping out with transportation... 'preciate it!
Originally posted by Wilson M. FYI, the Grado HP-1000 models were not exotic audiophile and consumer headphones. They were designed and sold for studio use only. Most consider them the ultimate studio engineering headphones. DJ'ing headphones. Feh, I used to DJ in clubs for more years than I care to remember and I never found a pair of "DJ" headphones that were neutral and accurate. |
Fair enough on the Grados... just offering my opinion after about 5 minutes of listening in a noisy environment to maybe 2 or 3 different sources -- so my comment should very much be taken in a "for whatever it's worth" sort of context.
Is there actually a category "DJ'ing headphones?" I know there are cans marketed & sold as good for studio use, mastering, DJ'ing, etc. There's a certain sound I associate with a lot of headphones that are marketed for those kinds of uses (the Sony 7506 is a classic example), and it seems they're almost always closed or semi-closed for isolation from external noise. Aside from measurable dips/peaks in frequency response, I'm not sure neutrality and accuracy can be objectively quantified.
As an aside, on the whole 'objectivism vs subjectivism' thing -- I often find myself reading debates on the Net with amusement, but rarely have anything to add myself... I'm sitting on the fence, sometimes leaning one way and sometimes another. Clearly there's equipment that measures well and sounds poor, and also equipment that measures poorly but sounds good. I tend to use measurements as a guide (price is not a very good guide, particularly at the high end), but my ears are the final judge. Even something that's almost universally regarded as neutral and accurate isn't worth it to me if I don't enjoy listening.
Anyway... thanks again for hosting a memorable meet, and for helping out with transportation... 'preciate it!