muzic4life
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2012
- Posts
- 1,104
- Likes
- 213
I am gonna try it TONIGHT !
tried the complies.. so far it was a success. the sound depends on how u cut the complies.. too thick will make the sound or bass muffled.. Thin will be alright. But ime, at the expense of clarity and somehow the signature is changed (becomes dark). I would've almost preferred it over tg334 & 1plus2 if it weren't the sibilance..
Anyways, thank very much Inks!
soullinker20,
I think it's time for you to ditch all those sibilant recordings/albums!
Did you try your Studio V 3rd Ani. with the IE800? I like this combo very much!
Nah IE800 itself is sibilant, no need to blame the recordings as a scapegoat. Damping helps but that big 5.5 spike and at times the 10k spike makes it sibilant. Still pretty good treble though, very airy.
Nah IE800 itself is sibilant, no need to blame the recordings as a scapegoat. Damping helps but that big 5.5 spike and at times the 10k spike makes it sibilant. Still pretty good treble though, very airy.
I just had a quick demo on this earphone. I am um3x user since sep 2010. The moment I plug this in (Sansa Clip+) and play some tracks I usually listen to recently. The first impression I get was the bass was bloated. It sounded like the low is covering up the rest. Could the reason that my ear is too used to um3x sound signature or this is the different between dynamic and balance armature?
I'd love to have someone explain Tyll's IE800 graph to me. From my experience, the IE800 sounded quite sharp / sibilant when I first tried them with deeper insertion, but actually less so than a lot of my other IEMs (TWFKs, FAD BAs, ...) with a shallow insertion. Rin's analysis seems to suggest that the D2CA thing is designed for shallow insertion, so I wonder whether fit / seal was different between the left and right channel on Tyll's measurement. In this case, the left channel would sound decidedly sibilant for sure.
(source: link)