metalsonata
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2011
- Posts
- 1,431
- Likes
- 113
And it helps that Tarantino hasn't jumped onto the CGI bandwagon.
I was getting pretty annoyed after the new Die Hard movie came out and people were all but saying that it was bad, excusing it with 'Well, it's a Die Hard, so what do you expect?' Have these people forgotten how good the first Die Hard was?
Quote:
I was getting pretty annoyed after the new Die Hard movie came out and people were all but saying that it was bad, excusing it with 'Well, it's a Die Hard, so what do you expect?' Have these people forgotten how good the first Die Hard was?
Quote:
Right with ya, I'm not going to lower my standards because the lowest common denominator has. People doing this is the reason we have the Transformer series. the CGI masturbation era is a nightmare for cinephile's because now directors just try to make that next big "Visual experience" which is a buzz phrase that makes me grind my teeth like no other. 300 I feel did it right, it had an interesting enough story; the characters had like...talking parts that wasn't just screaming over gunshots or explosions and although it was just a lot of GCI circle jerking it was also a well put together movie. Same with pretty much any Tarantino movie IMO.