You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Post Your Photography Here #2
- Thread starter Mrvile
- Start date
-
- Tags
- olympus photography
Jon L
For him, f/1.2 is a prime number
- Joined
- May 20, 2003
- Posts
- 4,491
- Likes
- 733
1.Checkered beetle (Checkered beetle (Trichodes favarius)
2.Running crab spider
3.Crane fly
4.Small bee
Great close-ups. They seem to be greater than 1:1 macro; were they cropped in closer or what lens are you using?
alenfromcroatia
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2013
- Posts
- 74
- Likes
- 26
Yeah thanks, I don't know what the mag is.
I never crop any of my shots be it macro or other things.
I reverse mount my Zuiko 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 on my Olympus E-410 and put a homemade diffuser on my popup flash, put the flash at full or 1/4 depending on ambient light, put the lens at f/8 or 11 and ISO is from 100 to 400. Shutter speeds around 1/80 at least and all the way to 1/180. I can't imagine what I would do with the MPE 65mm!!
I never crop any of my shots be it macro or other things.
I reverse mount my Zuiko 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 on my Olympus E-410 and put a homemade diffuser on my popup flash, put the flash at full or 1/4 depending on ambient light, put the lens at f/8 or 11 and ISO is from 100 to 400. Shutter speeds around 1/80 at least and all the way to 1/180. I can't imagine what I would do with the MPE 65mm!!
alenfromcroatia
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2013
- Posts
- 74
- Likes
- 26
Here is some new stuff.
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
4.
james444
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2004
- Posts
- 7,364
- Likes
- 2,812
Jon L
For him, f/1.2 is a prime number
- Joined
- May 20, 2003
- Posts
- 4,491
- Likes
- 733
Warning! Not for the weak of stomach below.
*Edit*
Removed and replaced with something more colorful.
*Edit*
Removed and replaced with something more colorful.
alenfromcroatia
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2013
- Posts
- 74
- Likes
- 26
Damnit, why would you shoot anything dead?Would you shoot crap? A dead human body? Cut off finger? Have some respect for that animal as well as some standard. Nothing personal but I hate when I see photography of dead things or in the case of street photography, beggars etc.
Here's something nicer.
Here's something nicer.
Damnit, why would you shoot anything dead?Would you shoot crap? A dead human body? Cut off finger? Have some respect for that animal as well as some standard. Nothing personal but I hate when I see photography of dead things or in the case of street photography, beggars etc.
It certainly sounds like something personal.
Shooting dead/gross things just for the shocking effect is kind of stupid.
But that's clearly not what Jon intended.
There is beauty in death. Just look at von Hagens Körperwelten exhibitions. It's certainly not for everyone, but there is also nothing wrong with it. Death is just a thing that happens and we all have to face it one way or another. As long as it is portrayed with dignity, there is absolutely nothing wrong with it IMO.
I did the usual run to a local park to take pictures of the cherry blossoms before the rain takes them away for another year.
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2011
- Posts
- 7,049
- Likes
- 1,168
I have some pretty friends.
Redcarmoose
Headphoneus Supremus
Damnit, why would you shoot anything dead?Would you shoot crap? A dead human body? Cut off finger? Have some respect for that animal as well as some standard. Nothing personal but I hate when I see photography of dead things or in the case of street photography, beggars etc.
Here's something nicer.
When I was in Biomedical photography school in the mid 1980s this kid comes running into our lab asking us to take close-ups of this funny silver disk. I had never seen one?
Jon L
For him, f/1.2 is a prime number
- Joined
- May 20, 2003
- Posts
- 4,491
- Likes
- 733
Damnit, why would you shoot anything dead?Would you shoot crap? A dead human body? Cut off finger? Have some respect for that animal as well as some standard. Nothing personal but I hate when I see photography of dead things or in the case of street photography, beggars etc.
Here's something nicer.
I can't say I agree, but what the heck, I removed it since maybe others feel as you do. I *will* say that photo still speaks to me on a primal level every time I look at it.
Redcarmoose
Headphoneus Supremus
I can't say I agree, but what the heck, I removed it since maybe others feel as you do. I *will* say that photo still speaks to me on a primal level every time I look at it.
I also find the total duality of life a great photographic subject. Still I would rather photograph nice stuff. It can't be argued that dark photographs, of war, changed people.
james444
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2004
- Posts
- 7,364
- Likes
- 2,812
I can't say I agree, but what the heck, I removed it since maybe others feel as you do. I *will* say that photo still speaks to me on a primal level every time I look at it.
I personally don't feel there's something wrong with it, but with so many viewers from different backgrounds, reactions are hard to predict.
That said, I'd probably use a spoiler tag for a shot like that, so people can opt to see.
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2003
- Posts
- 5,447
- Likes
- 3,103
I got a couple hand-held iPhone snaps of the moon with the phone held up to my telescope's eyepiece.
Users who are viewing this thread
Total: 7 (members: 0, guests: 7)