bbophead
Headphoneus Supremus
In the late '60s and early '70s, I graduated from the stock Shure M44-7 to the Stanton 681EEE on my original AR TT. Then I discoverd the Shure V15 Type II. That was better.
Checked vinylengine, and yes the 681EEE is a high-compliance cart, best for tonearms in the 4 gram to 16 gram range according to the chart. My mistake.
The Ortofon OM40 might be a good match as well.
mmf-7 cart revisited.:
If I wanted to replace the factory installed Goldring Eroica high-output mc, what MM's would serve me well for around $1k? Can't remember some of the previous suggestions you mentioned early in the year.
mmf-7 cart revisited.:
If I wanted to replace the factory installed Goldring Eroica high-output mc, what MM's would serve me well for around $1k? Can't remember some of the previous suggestions you mentioned early in the year.
Ask yourself first what kind of sound you are after. What you are familiar with, what you heard at other places and liked, what made you to run away but didn't out of sheer politeness - etc.
I know you like female vocals and that can be bete noire of MCs in the lower price range.
MMs are load picky - and if you can not present them with the correct load, they can sound pretty strange. Please remind me of the phono input resistance(s) and capacitance(s) and/or any imput load switching capabilities at your disposal. Arm wiring capacitance spec would also be handy.
Funny thing - recommendations can range from about 50$ all the way to 1111.11 - and although more money usually does bring better performance, there are exceptions in given combinations.
You hit the parameters Olympic style! Lots of Jazz; Blues; Soul; Zydeco; Afropop; Latin Jazz; Chinese-pop; Indian-pop; Classical ect. When it comes to my system, I like a certain amount of decorum. But there are times I want my system to swing! Musically, dynamically and emotionally.
This was my biggest challenge with the Senn HD800. Everybody and their niece was trying to sway me to buy a pair. Spent a night with them. And the Senn's wowed me on technical ability. Yet, my feet never moved, my head never bobbed the entire night - I was not moved emotionally despite technical merits.
Back to the dirt...er cart. I need sort of a Chameleon cart - refined when it's suppose to be, and wildwhen I want it to be!
Cont'd...
I have a Music Hall MMF-7. I'll have to look up resistance and capacitance. And the arm has upgraded Cardas wiring.
Electrical Characteristics
Load resistance: 47Kohms
Load capacitance: 100-500pf
Internal inductance: 0.2mH
Intenal resistance: 77ohms
Originally Posted by analogsurviver /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I find the advice by dosley01 a post above right on the money.
With your choices in music styles, the cart does need really good trackability - treble content in all the genres mentioned can be quite taxing. Thank goodness you did not mention the toughest of them all, the Chinese opera .... Nothing against it, but it is the ultimate b***h to record and reproduce accurately.
I would throw Audio Technica 440MLa and 150MLX in the mix.
I can sympathize with you regarding Senns. HD 800 surprised me in a very positive way, but it still is rational first emotional second type of approach. I had nothing but shudder reminescensces of HD600/650 - most definitely not my coup of anything. Cold, sterile, bland, lifeless - dead. You can power them off nuclear power station and I would not change my opinion. Electrostatic/Electret Senns are another story altogether.
Your desires/requirement for cart echoes that of most men for women- but there *is* a slight discrepancy between wishes and what is realistically achievable...
Electrical characteristics you posted are for the ???cartridge - and not toneram wiring. That would have some next to negligible resistance value you can completely ignore with MMs and capacitance value in the 100 pF order of magnitude. This capacitance IS important - the lower it is, the more versatility it will offer when paired with MM carts.
Not to mislead you, I may have wrongly used "arm" when commenting on the electrical characteristics - it was from the manual for my Music Hall TT.
Not to mislead you, I may have wrongly used "arm" when commenting on the electrical characteristics - it was from the manual for my Music Hall TT.
The Esoteric is here.
It is one of the most detailed audio components i have ever heard.
The Esoteric is here.
It is one of the most detailed audio components i have ever heard.
That does it: you will all have to endure my hand drawn graphs (and I am terrible with drawing etc ), as I have no time or intention to master some computer wizardry required to produce "present day normally" looking graphs generated by computer.
If even the manuals mix apples with asparaguses - no wonder poor audiophiles make even substantially greater mess out of it all ...