Ph34rful
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2002
- Posts
- 665
- Likes
- 10
I'd probably pick another one up (returned first two because of hum) if I knew for sure that the hum would be gone.
Originally posted by TUBEBO On the negative, the bottom end was a rolled off, and details tend to be "hazed" a bit. And typical of tubes vs solid state, the dynamics are not as good as with the better solid state designs, ( like the Perreaux) The bass is much better on the Perreaux. Deeper, with more punch and detail. And the resolution and space with the Perreaux is superb! For my personal taste's. I prefer the Perreaux over the MG Head. I also owned a Creek OBH10. It was just a tad better than the headphone jack on my Marantz PM17 amp. |
Originally posted by purk Hi, I'll let the Perreaux run non-stop for two or three days or so and will give you guys an update. So far (1.5 hours), it doesn't get hot. I took pictures of the two version for comparison, V0.3 and V0.5. Since I don't have my own website to hold the pics, let me know if you want to host the pictures for us. There are about 3 or 4 changes that Perreaux done to their original amp. Purk |
Originally posted by emelius i've been checkin' that site for 'bout 2 months now...someone might want to remind the guy |