@HeadHoncho
My VSD3s are stucked in my ears since this morning
I'm getting very jealous Peter....I'm still waiting for mine
@HeadHoncho
My VSD3s are stucked in my ears since this morning
LOL sure.
http://blog.shure.com/shure-notes/inside-headphones-with-yuri-shulman-shure-engineer/
But no, I'm sure you know a lot more about headphones than him.
Wait, that's just one guy. What about... http://eu.audio-technica.com/en/support/questions/question.asp?id=239
Hm. I'm confused...
LOL sure.
http://blog.shure.com/shure-notes/inside-headphones-with-yuri-shulman-shure-engineer/
But no, I'm sure you know a lot more about headphones than him.
Wait, that's just one guy. What about... http://eu.audio-technica.com/en/support/questions/question.asp?id=239
Hm. I'm confused...
The 7550 is going to be less mid-forward and less bright than the CK100. The soundstage is nice and large, though, and sibilance is never a problem. Isolation is mediocre and the fit is atypical, but not uncomfortable once you get used to it. If you want a somewhat similar signature with the comfort and isolation of a BA earphone, the TDK BA200 is a good option. I compared the 7550 and BA200 in the BA200 review: http://theheadphonelist.com/headphone_review/tdk-ba200/
On the real cheap side (nothing wrong with getting a disposable IEM if it sounds good to you), I would strongly recommend the UE600 and Fidue A63
"Dude", I'm a sound engineer, and have been for many years. Don't glorify yourself on other companies or people's comments and blogs you read from. Some companies do burn-in before delivering there products so that the consumer won't have to.
Sorry to turn the tide "dude".....you don't have to act confused.
what do they really mean by burning in , just play your music , it will burn .
@HeadHoncho
My VSD3s are stucked in my ears since this morning
what do they really mean by burning in , just play your music , it will burn .
Aha....1clearhead.....so you're a sound engineer....we'd better trust your review then
The term "burning in" is a bit of a holdover from old loudspeakers which had big, heavy mechanical parts which, fresh off the assembly line, needed time before they could move smoothly. There was also the notion that without "burning in" the motors it would be easier to blow the speakers thanks to the parts being stiff. It's relatively antiquated now and exists chiefly as a placebo effect.
Remember that this started by talking about giant speakers which required significant mechanical movement. Headphones are extremely tiny units, and IEMs even MORE so. They don't need burning in.
http://www.wired.com/2013/11/tnhyui-earphone-burn-in/
Just for a good read. There's psychological burn-in, but that's all. If I put two headphones on a table and made you guess which one had been burned in? Wouldn't happen. It's popped up in so many threads where someone got a new pair in the mail and were shocked, SHOCKED that their replacements sounded exactly like their old ones, which had been treated with a hundred hours of burn-in.
At best we're talking about maybe an hour of motion just to get the parts loosened up. There's no science behind burn-in. Just conjecture and references to old technology.
Yes 1clearhead, you just caught my attention with a $10 IEM sounding better than a $1400 so I jumped on your hype train and just ordered the Ivery IS-1. Heck, what have I got to lose
It was just a coincidence bringing these 2 together.
Did not know it was going to create such feedback. But, then again it is a David and Goliath type of scale.
Please, let me know your comments after you had used them for some time.