M^3, CKKIII, Lisa III, LD V, ??? for HD600
Mar 14, 2008 at 8:48 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 27

gyrodec

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Posts
155
Likes
13
I read some great reviews of the new LD dual-mono sold state (V I think) and I started thinking, as I don't really need a portable perhaps I souldn't go the Pico route (I'm on the list, but way, way down).

So, for about $500, what would work well. I don't mind a build-for-hire of an AMB or other DIY project. ALso I recently saw photos of a balanced CKKIII and the posted made it sound like I could get one of those for my budget.
So:
- M^3
- Balanced or SE CKKIII
- Lisa III
- LD V
- Balanced JISBOS (new AMB buffer that somebody said sounded better than their Lisa II clone - I would need to adjust the gain elsewhere for this, but I'm ok with that)
- any other amps you care to suggest

Note, I'm biased against tubes (bad-pun grin), but might be persuaded.

Thanks for any help.
 
Mar 14, 2008 at 8:59 PM Post #2 of 27
I have a SE CKKIII and its awesome with my HD580 with 650 cable and 600 grills. The only comparison I have is the builtin headamp of the EMU 0404 USB, but the CKKIII is a huge step above that. I can't really imagine a different (single ended) headphone amp giving a really large performance jump above the CKKIII. I think you should go fully differential/balanced to get the most sound quality, that's probably what my next upgrade will be. I don't really get how someone would set up a balanced CKKIII, because it already has an active ground?
 
Mar 14, 2008 at 9:07 PM Post #3 of 27
I use an M^3 with my HD600's and it sounds fantastic. You can also change op-amps to customize the sound according to your personal taste. This amp delivers plenty of current and voltage for the power hungry 600's. Going balanced can be a huge leap financially, not only do you need to recable your headphones, but also need a balanced source and amp as well, along with interconnects. I don't think $500 is going to cover it.
 
Mar 14, 2008 at 9:09 PM Post #4 of 27
M3

I'm not sute how you do it, but I saw pics of one that was built and the poster said it was definaely a CKKIII, with an Opus DAC in the same box (probbaly what I will do as stage 2, unless the new Buffalo DAC is much better.)
 
Mar 14, 2008 at 9:42 PM Post #5 of 27
The single-ended CK²III is, as noted by m3_arun, great for the HD580/600's.....fed by either my 0404 USB or Marantz SA8001. It's a very cost efficient unit that doesn't give up much to more expensive designs, IMHO.

I was thinking about getting a preamp for my speaker rig, and asked MisterX about a JISBOS based unit--he said that it's extraordinarily neutral.

Can the gain be adjusted, though, because all I read was that they were intended to be unity gain buffers--is that not entirely correct? If we're considering single-ended here, I've found that the HD600's typically need some gain on properly mastered acoustic/orchestral recordings. Going balanced gets you an extra 6 dB, but I'm not sure if that is enough.
 
Mar 15, 2008 at 6:15 AM Post #6 of 27
I heard the Lisa III at a meet last year. Very nice, but the headphones were not mine and the music quite unfamiliar. It was har to discern what the amp was really doing.

For tubes, I had an MPX3 here for a few weeks (from a friend) and I think it would really surprise you. Let's face it, headphones don't take a whole lot of power so providing enough current/voltage is not a difficult task. If you can get a listen to one at a meet or whatever, give it a fair try. It's pretty special and might be just the ticket.

As for the CK²III, if you use the original parts list the gain of the CK²III is 9x (19dB). If you change just four resistors, you can get it down to 4.1x (12.3dB). Definitely not unity gain.

I built a CK²III and REALLY enjoy it. It beats the pants off of a lot of amps I've heard. It reflects upstream components quite well, and yet doesn't make you want to change everything ahead of it. That's quite a feat.

Now, you can't change the opamps on it (like the M^3) as the only one inside of it controls the DC servo. So if you want to swap to tailor your sound, this is not your amp. I believe there are a narrow choice of BJTs to choose from, but I seem to remember that one was easy to source, and the rest were not (I could be wrong). The build of the board itself was fun, and the final wiring/setup was nicely challenging.

But the sound of it definitely makes it a keeper. With the amp warmed up and connected to an SACD player, I was "that close" to the music. Sweet.

Edit: Incidentally, some Lisa discussions were during this meet -> http://www.head-fi.org/forums/f45/se...2007-a-268738/
 
Apr 1, 2008 at 7:41 AM Post #7 of 27
Pete7, I see Inara in your avatar...you a browncoat?
biggrin.gif


bhjazz, I'm looking at making myself a CK2III for the office and don't necessarily expect miracles, but I was wondering what your impression of it was compared to M3 or the MPX3.
 
Apr 1, 2008 at 8:52 AM Post #8 of 27
Off that list, M^3 is great, I would also add PPAv2 as well.

CKK-III is great, but I think PPAv2 and M^3 are better.

I haven't heard a balanced JISBOS, but at $90 + PSU for a balanced setup, how can you go wrong!?

Hell, if you don't mind a buffer without gain (because you have a strong source), just build a single ended JISBOS buffer for $45 + PSU and be seriously HAPPY!
 
Apr 1, 2008 at 1:01 PM Post #9 of 27
Quote:

Originally Posted by fierce_freak /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Pete7, I see Inara in your avatar...you a browncoat?
biggrin.gif


bhjazz, I'm looking at making myself a CK2III for the office and don't necessarily expect miracles, but I was wondering what your impression of it was compared to M3 or the MPX3.



Definitely, fierce one- awesome show. Serenity 2 supposedly out this summer. I worship the temple that is Inara, even if she is just a glorified prostitute on a a canceled TV show.
tongue.gif

I wouldn't mind hearing a CK2III myself...
 
Apr 1, 2008 at 1:32 PM Post #10 of 27
so these can be powered well by the MisterX Mini^3 portable amp???
 
Apr 1, 2008 at 2:03 PM Post #11 of 27
I have both the CKK and the m^3 and I would suggest either based on your budget. The m^3 is a step above the CKK but for the CKK price, I think it performs great, especially with senns
 
Apr 1, 2008 at 4:26 PM Post #12 of 27
Thanks for the new burst of opinions, it all helps. Now if only I could justify a B22. (Down boy. Good things come to those that save.
smily_headphones1.gif


P.S. Which cancelled TV show was the "fine lady" on.
 
Apr 1, 2008 at 4:30 PM Post #13 of 27
Firefly! Only the best TV show ever, in my opinion (well, top 3 show, in any case).

Quote:

Originally Posted by FallenAngel /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I haven't heard a balanced JISBOS, but at $90 + PSU for a balanced setup, how can you go wrong!?


This is actually something I was considering, but I was worried about no VAS if I use it with some HD650's.
 
Apr 1, 2008 at 4:52 PM Post #14 of 27
Quote:

Originally Posted by FallenAngel /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Off that list, M^3 is great, I would also add PPAv2 as well.

CKK-III is great, but I think PPAv2 and M^3 are better.

I haven't heard a balanced JISBOS, but at $90 + PSU for a balanced setup, how can you go wrong!?

Hell, if you don't mind a buffer without gain (because you have a strong source), just build a single ended JISBOS buffer for $45 + PSU and be seriously HAPPY!



How about a Gilmore Lite? Anyone know how that would stack up against these newer amps?
 
Apr 1, 2008 at 5:04 PM Post #15 of 27
Morena Baccarin held a major role as Adria on the last season of StarGate SG-1 - making another appearance in the very recently released-directly-to-DVD StarGate movie, "The Ark of Truth."
wink.gif


P.S. I think the M3/PPA are the best in that list. They will bring up the last little bit of bottom end that the other ones can't.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top