I have a different view and find UHA-4 to be a much better amp then D-ZERO.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Leckerton Audio Slimline UHA-4
- Thread starter mrarroyo
- Start date
MRiNiCK
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2010
- Posts
- 569
- Likes
- 12
I have a different view and find UHA-4 to be a much better amp then D-ZERO.
Alright Thanks.. i was initially supposed to get the UHA-4 but money was an issue at the time lol
lee730
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2011
- Posts
- 16,804
- Likes
- 452
Quote:
If you wanna even take it to another rlevel MRiNiCK I suggest you opt for the UHA6 MKII with OP-Amp 8610 (the UHA4 comes with this stock). Believe me owning both of them the MKII is clearly that much better than the 4 . It's worth the extra money.
Alright Thanks.. i was initially supposed to get the UHA-4 but money was an issue at the time lol
If you wanna even take it to another rlevel MRiNiCK I suggest you opt for the UHA6 MKII with OP-Amp 8610 (the UHA4 comes with this stock). Believe me owning both of them the MKII is clearly that much better than the 4 . It's worth the extra money.
MRiNiCK
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2010
- Posts
- 569
- Likes
- 12
If you wanna even take it to another rlevel MRiNiCK I suggest you opt for the UHA6 MKII with OP-Amp 8610 (the UHA4 comes with this stock). Believe me owning both of them the MKII is clearly that much better than the 4 . It's worth the extra money.
is it worth it for portable use.? because i'm always on the go no matter what days it is. lol and if im not well different story
lee730
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2011
- Posts
- 16,804
- Likes
- 452
Quote:
I think it is. It's about the same size as the UHA4 but just very slightly thicker. But the sound quality upgrade you get over the 4 is very much worth the extra difference in price. What will you be using it with though?
is it worth it for portable use.? because i'm always on the go no matter what days it is. lol and if im not well different story
I think it is. It's about the same size as the UHA4 but just very slightly thicker. But the sound quality upgrade you get over the 4 is very much worth the extra difference in price. What will you be using it with though?
MRiNiCK
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2010
- Posts
- 569
- Likes
- 12
I think it is. It's about the same size as the UHA4 but just very slightly thicker. But the sound quality upgrade you get over the 4 is very much worth the extra difference in price. What will you be using it with though?
Ipod touch on the go and through my laptop at home.
Headphones- 1964 T CIEM, and DT1350
at Home, BrainWavz HM%, Ultrasone Pro 900, Sennheiser HD 650
MRiNiCK
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2010
- Posts
- 569
- Likes
- 12
I think it is. It's about the same size as the UHA4 but just very slightly thicker. But the sound quality upgrade you get over the 4 is very much worth the extra difference in price. What will you be using it with though?
UHA6 MKII with OP-Amp 8610 online says it comes wit it as standard.
lee730
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2011
- Posts
- 16,804
- Likes
- 452
Quote:
I thought it came with 209 standard? Unless Nick went back to 8610 ? He use to charge an extra $10.00 I think for the upgrade over 209.
UHA6 MKII with OP-Amp 8610 online says it comes wit it as standard.
I thought it came with 209 standard? Unless Nick went back to 8610 ? He use to charge an extra $10.00 I think for the upgrade over 209.
MRiNiCK
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2010
- Posts
- 569
- Likes
- 12
I thought it came with 209 standard? Unless Nick went back to 8610 ? He use to charge an extra $10.00 I think for the upgrade over 209.
lol well lucky me then.
Nachkebia
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2009
- Posts
- 776
- Likes
- 14
Hey guys,
I love this amp, perfect size, sound and price but usb connection has stopped working after all these years and now I am in need of new portable amp. Should I go with this again or there are new devices i look through?
I love this amp, perfect size, sound and price but usb connection has stopped working after all these years and now I am in need of new portable amp. Should I go with this again or there are new devices i look through?
max111
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2007
- Posts
- 86
- Likes
- 11
What not just send it back to nick and get it fix?
lee730
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2011
- Posts
- 16,804
- Likes
- 452
Quote:
You an do as the poster above or even consider upgrading to the UHA6 MKII which is a better sounding amp IMO.
Hey guys,
I love this amp, perfect size, sound and price but usb connection has stopped working after all these years and now I am in need of new portable amp. Should I go with this again or there are new devices i look through?
You an do as the poster above or even consider upgrading to the UHA6 MKII which is a better sounding amp IMO.
Does anyone both a UHA-4 and a UHA-6S mkII that they would be willing to snap a couple of photos of for the sake of size comparison?
lee730
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2011
- Posts
- 16,804
- Likes
- 452
Going from memory they both are similar in overall size (length & width) with the UHA4 being about half the thickness of the UHA6. Both are quite portable IMO with the UHA4 being the most portable. In terms of sound the UHA6 MKII is a noticeable improvement IMO and well worth the price premium. Now if you need very fine volume attenuation for lower volume listening without channel imbalance (ideal for sensitive IEMs) then the UHA4 may be more suited to your needs. This is more so of an issue if you are using sources with a powerful LO which can then lead to channel imbalance on the MKII model. But at the same time you can request for a lower gain setting which should mitigate this issue (if any).
Thanks for the comments! I'm having severe problems with channel imbalance on my CIEM's, so I appreciate your thought on that too.
Users who are viewing this thread
Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)