- Joined
- Jun 5, 2003
- Posts
- 5,444
- Likes
- 3,093
take one for the team Eric and get all 3. Inquiring minds need to know.
Here Here!! Cheers to eric getting all 3.
take one for the team Eric and get all 3. Inquiring minds need to know.
Are you going to pick one or more up? Would really like to read some hands on impressions of them, especially from previous fx700 users. Also looking forward to james444 thoughts.
Here Here!! Cheers to eric getting all 3.
take one for the team Eric and get all 3. Inquiring minds need to know.
Axismundi: how does it compare to ie800?
Just got these. Too early to say much about sound, but from memory they do have more mids than FX700. Still quite a significant bass/mid-bass bump, maybe even more than FX700. Highs seem roughly the same, if a tad recessed compared to FX700 but extending very well. Same kind of timbre overall.
Build quality is excellent, as one would expect. Cable is great, continuing JVC tradition - solid and thick, yet flexible and without microphonics. Reminds me of FXZ200. I like the idea of replaceable cable, although I wish they made the plug terminations smaller. As a side note, I have an aftermarket Shure-type cable which fits FX850 but falls off quite easily (although I don't have any issues using it with XBA-H3).
They are heavy and big, but well designed and fit my ears well (but then I did not have any issues with FXZ200 and XBA-H3, so I'm probably not a reference).
Are you going to pick one or more up? Would really like to read some hands on impressions of them, especially from previous fx700 users. Also looking forward to james444 thoughts.
I don't screw around my friend...i tell it like I hear it
Axismundi: how does it compare to ie800?
MOchill said that it's a lot more neutral than the fx700. Could you confirm? Is the bass level toned down? Is it still a bass-head IEM?
Based on preliminary impressions, (much) more bass/mid-bass impact, with a comment that as FX700, FX850 does go low but not as low as IE800. Mids are more recessed, but at this stage I'd not venture to say more. Highs are very competent on FX850, however they do not extend as much as IE800 (which is uneatable in this respect) but then they are also not piercing, which is quite a performance given the clarity that they are able to render.
FX850 seem to have retained the famous FX700 timbre and is a good all-rounder, if a bit bass-heavy to my ears. IE800 on the other hand is hard to beat when it comes to clarity and mids, although overdoes the highs and this sound a bit unnatural at times. To be able to truly enjoy IE800, I need to eq down the highs (around 10KHz), for FX850 it is the mid bass that has to be adjusted (120 Hz or so).
It may or may not make a difference, but keep in mind that this is before break in (or "burn in").
The game has changed, but then again not so much imo. Dynamic drivers and (multi-) BAs are still apples and oranges to my ears. I know we have a myriad of options among the latter nowadays and they have undeniable technical advantages. But when it comes to natural tonality, particularly with classical music, I still find myself reaching for a DD based (or at least hybrid) pair of IEMs 9 out of 10 times.
I'm pretty confident the 850 will continue JVC's tradition of first rate timbre, just hope that they went easy on the bass with these.
Can you please compare FX850 to IE80?