JVC HA-FX850 iem. Woody
Apr 8, 2014 at 3:28 PM Post #196 of 578
  Just to dispel any rumors, I did not order the FX750 and FX650 on April Fools' Day and personally couldn't care less about how they sound in comparison to the FX850.
smile_phones.gif
 

 
wink.gif
 
 
Apr 8, 2014 at 10:22 PM Post #197 of 578
Apr 9, 2014 at 12:03 AM Post #198 of 578
Jeez, its like staring into the sun. Let me know if you want to give up those 650's ha.
 
Apr 9, 2014 at 2:40 AM Post #200 of 578
How do these fair to the HA-FXZ100/200 series? The price jump is a bit steep but if its better than the FXZ200, I am sold
 
Apr 9, 2014 at 4:05 AM Post #201 of 578
"not worthy"

 
Yes, you are. The plan is to send all three on tour by end of the month.
 
Quick first impressions of the "wooden threesome" (aka FX650/750/850):
 
  1. FX650/750 have the same fixed cable, with shorter strain reliefs than the FX850 and are easier to wear over-ear than the latter.
  2. All three are bass cannons.
  3. All three have roughly similar sound signatures.
  4. FX750 are very close to FX850 in resolution and refinement.
  5. FX650 seem like a step down from FX750/850 (but still sound great).
  6. FX650 are less sensitive and need more driving power than FX750/850.
  7. j444 mod works great on all of them (lowering bass quantity / improving bass clarity).
 
Apr 10, 2014 at 10:32 PM Post #204 of 578
   
Yes, you are. The plan is to send all three on tour by end of the month.
 
Quick first impressions of the "wooden threesome" (aka FX650/750/850):
 
  1. FX650/750 have the same fixed cable, with shorter strain reliefs than the FX850 and are easier to wear over-ear than the latter.
  2. All three are bass cannons.
  3. All three have roughly similar sound signatures.
  4. FX750 are very close to FX850 in resolution and refinement.
  5. FX650 seem like a step down from FX750/850 (but still sound great).
  6. FX650 are less sensitive and need more driving power than FX750/850.
  7. j444 mod works great on all of them (lowering bass quantity / improving bass clarity).

So I guess the FX750 are a great bargain by the looks of things :O
 
Apr 10, 2014 at 10:53 PM Post #205 of 578
Narrowed my list down to just a few, but think the 750s will be my choice. Waiting for my info to get verified by Tenso now. 
 
Apr 10, 2014 at 11:46 PM Post #207 of 578
Yes, you are. The plan is to send all three on tour by end of the month.

Quick first impressions of the "wooden threesome" (aka FX650/750/850):

  • FX650/750 have the same fixed cable, with shorter strain reliefs than the FX850 and are easier to wear over-ear than the latter.
  • All three are bass cannons.
  • All three have roughly similar sound signatures.
  • FX750 are very close to FX850 in resolution and refinement.
  • FX650 seem like a step down from FX750/850 (but still sound great).
  • FX650 are less sensitive and need more driving power than FX750/850.
  • j444 mod works great on all of them (lowering bass quantity / improving bass clarity).


Thanks!

Very interesting. I had hoped there would be more to distinguish them all besides general quality of sound and removable cables, ie FR differences. But interestingly, all of a sudden, I vaguely remember doing a google translate of something about the trio and based on the descriptions getting the impression that the main distinguishing difference between the 750 and 850 was the replaceable cable.
 
Apr 10, 2014 at 11:58 PM Post #208 of 578
Is the 750 smaller than the 850? I think I'm good with the removable cable on the 850. I used to think the FX500 I had was bulletproof til the cable up and shorted out on me one day.
 
Apr 12, 2014 at 1:57 PM Post #210 of 578
Here is a pic (source: google) showing the 3 models side by side (FX850/FX750/FX650)
 
Always thought that the FX700 is large (FX750 seems similar to the FX700 in size) but the FX850 seems to be huge!
These JVC woodies are however some of the most beautiful IEMs and build quality seems top notch
lineup.jpg
 
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top