M3NTAL
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2006
- Posts
- 2,364
- Likes
- 1,101
Nah, I think they should continue exploring other options. More into the ES segment; more into the ANC / TWS type stuff.
+1Nah, I think they should continue exploring other options. More into the ES segment; more into the ANC / TWS type stuff.
Anyone bit on this yet? I'll need to read more into it for J.River integration (vst) - With Audeze headphones blossoming with EQ - I'd think there would be a resource on their website to get the headphone to their optimal tuning without needing Reveal. I know there are a bunch of EQ settings spread throughout the entire forum, but it would be nice to have a consolidated list.Filter is up on Mitch’s site! I’m away for a month so haven’t had a chance to try yet:
https://accuratesound.ca/product/audeze-lcd-r-filterset/
You are paying for the time Mitch spent measuring the headphone and then creating the EQ. I doubt he will make much money from this considering how few LCD-R were produced. If you can create a better one yourself, there is of course no reason to buy it. I don't personally think that I can, but I'm waiting for a review or two before I buy.I'm confused by what these are. An EQ set for $175?
It looks like you can do a trial offer and check it out. Seems oddly expensive for just the data points ($175) given the number of free options now available for EQ. It's also deceiving how stretched out their frequency response graph is. It looks like the biggest difference in FR is only like 2db?
Oh Yeah! I updated my J.River and it didn't import the EQ profiles. Your profile IS the one I use.I use a slightly modified version of Resolve's EQ. The Reveal plugin for the LCD-X 2021 is not a good match at all in my opinion. It would be nice if Audeze posted a reveal plugin for the LCD-R, or if they did what @M3NTAL suggested and posted various versions on their site. If EQ is how Audeze intends their headphones to be used, they should make it easy for everyone to get the proper EQ settings.
Using the graph, I kludged a parametric EQ set-up (except the bass, as I'm not using the original amp) and they definitely sound more even that way.
I use Roon, which is nice, since Reveal is included, but I tend to prefer some of the "bespoke" offerings that other users have posted for EQ over Reveal. I think Reveal is a decent option, and allows for "Wet vs Dry" EQ tunings and some other configurations, but the fact that non-Roon users need to purchase Reveal is kind of silly.Oh Yeah! I updated my J.River and it didn't import the EQ profiles. Your profile IS the one I use.
I 100% agree with you. All the Pre '21 products would be ABSOLUTELY AWESOME to have Audeze's idea of final tuning. Their new wireless products are much cheaper and have DSP with multiple tuning options. Some of us paid decent money for Reveal - I know it's apples and oranges, but it lacks options that those cheaper non-reference products offer. I'll be bold and say - all the way back to first round production 2.1 Slats to "A" grill transitional phase.