Musicality is what matters and I would agree with that. However it has shown to me that equipment that have higher bandwidth even if you do not use the extra bandwidth tend to sound better providing everything else is equal. I believe that you can have both. It always been my impression in the first place that IF/AMR picked the BB DAC chip over other chips that have better numbers but for better sound.
P.S. I hope also that IFI pushing the iDSD micro product that recording engineers would take another look to increasing their skills in making better recordings and mastering in the first place.
I concur with the first part entirely.
Regarding P.S. I have to say that I am both ecstatic and aghast by the DSD512 - at the same time.
Ecstatic is easy to understand - who would not like to have a better product ?
Aghast is a bit harder to understand for the
average listener. The recording gear for DSD256 does not exist for more than 2 years, meaning there are hardly any true DSD256 recordings available. At the moment, there are no DSD512 capable commercially available recorders.
The size of the files for the DSD look like this :
DSD64 1 GB 22 minutes audio
DSD128 1 GB 11 minutes audio
DSD258 1 GB 5 min 30 sec audio
DSD512 1 GB 2 min 45 sec audio
( redbook CD 0.7GB 80 min audio )
That means your storage has to go up by a factor of X - depending "what" resolution are you using now. It means
Terrabyte RAID arrays & backups - which both dwarf the cost of the micro.
Above is the minimal problem for the recording engineer. What higher sampling rates bring is increased extension in high frequencies, in case of DSD256 that should be "essentially flat" to approx 100 kHz, in case of DSD512 at least 150 kHz, both rolling off above that frequency far far less sharp than in PCM with brick filtering.
It means new microphones "approximately" capable of such extended bandwidth - currently, there is only
one commercially available microphone with 100 kHz bandwidth . It means FAR better whatever is following the microphone , it means pushing the envelope on every front, it means one hell of a lot of money before the first recording truly of such calibre can be
attempted - because it takes time to master any new tool. The pace at which a new microphone can be designed/built is extremely slow process, measured in years, if not decades - a DAC can be designed "overnight" in comparison. And the greater effort/work will ALWAYS have to be done by the microphone guys...
And it has to be said loud and clear - "upconverting" anything, even DSD up to DSD512 will not bring the same quality as true DSD512 recording - meaning most remastering business will make little if any sense.
As much as I would have liked to bring back Toscanini, Callas, Hendrix or ( paste here your favourite late performer you would like to be recorded in his/her prime using latest recording gear ) - that is not possible.
Please do not get me wrong; I am extremely vocal supporter of "fast" audio, be it analog or digital, here on head-fi. But the nearest association
octa brings is supersonic commercial flight and its icons, the Concorde and TU-144. Yes, it is/was a technological breaktrough/achievement , yes it was the prestigious way of flying - for the tiny elite who could afford it. This nut was so tough to break that USA abandoned its own SST rather early into the development,
the TU-144 was only flown for a very short period of time mainly for the prestige at a loss to its operator, the Concorde being far more commercially succesful - but that barely kept it afloat. Practical costs of air transport using subsonic Jumbo Jets or supersonic Concorde are so vastly different that an average passenger would not even dare to dream about flying with Concorde - even if it was still in operation.
So, please (re)consider; if you are going to utilize all the capabilities which micro is offering, BY FAR the lowest cost will be the micro itself. Due to the quantum leap of performance in recording required to get to the true DSD512 recording, the cost will have to be passed on to the consumer - so do not expect price differences as between DSD64 and DSD128, which are possible with currently available equipment - expect at the very minimumat least double that what DSD128 downloads costs now.
I also do not anticipate an order of magnitude higher speed internet either - or at least not at the same price we are paying at the moment, not anytime soon.
All that said and done, I am on the lookout for the "piggybank" I have stashed away so well that myself have trouble in finding it; meant for the trully exceptional audio products. I do not care for the T-shirt or specially numbered limited edition micro, but membership in the iClub is something I can ill afford to miss. IFi audio seem to be one of the extremely few audio manufacturers who obviously consider the whole chain, from sound live to what you can listen at home - not just from the input to the output of their "box".
And that is worth supporting.