well some constructive thoughts.
the points you raise,
1 well the the no bulleted intro. well i dont believe in them, if you want a 5 second "yeah its good, no its bad" review its not really where im aiming. though since i intend at some point to do a compendium i do normally also a "quick review" that i aim for less than 500 words. all my newer reviews have that on post 2 of the thread.
2 yeah they are long. sometimes too long but the way i see it if you care about the stuff youll want to read it all, if not thats what the quick reviews are for. if people chose to not read due to its length then thats up to them as i dont see any particular reason to emulate more generalised publications with more cursory information.
3 well i agree i dont have the most wonderful writing but again if people want to just scan, its what the quick ones are for.
4 no technical specs, mostly because i dont really care about them. for some products the tech specs are everything, ifm buying an SSD the numbers matter. if im buying a loaf of bread numbers are meaningless as they in no way quantify the aspect of the product i care about. still as this is more commonly given in short things i do add it into my quick reviews
5 no internals, yeah that would be because im not ripping stuff apart, again because i dont believe it matters and im not ruining things for no reason.