Matt
Are there any women on this board?
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2001
- Posts
- 973
- Likes
- 12
Oh my...
I've gotten my HD600s last night (one week & four day wait from Jan Meier), left them on all night and have donned them for the first time. My first impression? "Whaaaaah?"
During the time I have been waiting for the 600s (which has actually been more like seven actual, real, hard-to-bear, tortured weeks, because the first pair Jan sent me seem to have somehow been lost in the mail...but I digress...), I have been listening to my ONLY pair of headphones, Sony MDR-W07s, which came with an "All-Weather Sport" Sony walkman tape player some years ago.
Anyhow, after the 12 hours of burn in time (which I don't really believe in, but do religiously anyways), I notice that *compared to the frickin' Sonys* the highs are way etched, the midrage is just...there...(nothing special) and I am missing micro-details like I was getting with the Sonys (delicate echoes from synth hits on my Deee-lite CD, for instance).
The highs are pretty fuggin' forward AND etched, which was not the case with the Sonys. Though the Sonys are flimsy and, well, yellow, they were doing things much better than the 600s. The highs were just natural and effortless in comparison.
The bass on the 600s is so heavy. This may just be a function of the fact that I've been listening to the Sonys, but the Sonys definitely were not deficient with the EarMax Pro.
Anyhow, what I am asking for is some reassurance or a dictum to ditch these ****ing things. Bah.
I saved the equiptment list for last to be able to firmly instil in your mind that this setup sounds very revealing and musical with the Sonys. Though the interconnect isn't the best, I was hearing so much more detail and music with the Sonys.
(Equiptment: Sony D-25S > Acoustic Research "Y" cable (mini to RCA) > EarMax Pro > HD600s)
Grrr...
- Matt
I've gotten my HD600s last night (one week & four day wait from Jan Meier), left them on all night and have donned them for the first time. My first impression? "Whaaaaah?"
During the time I have been waiting for the 600s (which has actually been more like seven actual, real, hard-to-bear, tortured weeks, because the first pair Jan sent me seem to have somehow been lost in the mail...but I digress...), I have been listening to my ONLY pair of headphones, Sony MDR-W07s, which came with an "All-Weather Sport" Sony walkman tape player some years ago.
Anyhow, after the 12 hours of burn in time (which I don't really believe in, but do religiously anyways), I notice that *compared to the frickin' Sonys* the highs are way etched, the midrage is just...there...(nothing special) and I am missing micro-details like I was getting with the Sonys (delicate echoes from synth hits on my Deee-lite CD, for instance).
The highs are pretty fuggin' forward AND etched, which was not the case with the Sonys. Though the Sonys are flimsy and, well, yellow, they were doing things much better than the 600s. The highs were just natural and effortless in comparison.
The bass on the 600s is so heavy. This may just be a function of the fact that I've been listening to the Sonys, but the Sonys definitely were not deficient with the EarMax Pro.
Anyhow, what I am asking for is some reassurance or a dictum to ditch these ****ing things. Bah.
I saved the equiptment list for last to be able to firmly instil in your mind that this setup sounds very revealing and musical with the Sonys. Though the interconnect isn't the best, I was hearing so much more detail and music with the Sonys.
(Equiptment: Sony D-25S > Acoustic Research "Y" cable (mini to RCA) > EarMax Pro > HD600s)
Grrr...
- Matt