I think Henry's subpar (if you want to call them that) performances against ManU and Chelsea during that stretch must be put into perspective. That was a lot of high demand games in a week stretch and he performed magnificantly against Leeds.
Totti is up there, but is he the team player that Henry is? Henry is consistently a threat because he is the team player. Pires' goals are almost always from brilliant Henry passes, or start with an Henry run that breaks everything down. Fact of the matter is, i cannot think of a time when he is actually STOPPED during a run.
His choice of runs is why you don't see him making them against the likes of Ferdinand or Makelele, he knows he doesn't have to. Perhaps, next year he will be more willing to take those chances and get stopped once or twice.
but ask any coach, they want the striker who is more Henry (willing to lay off the pass then chance the run) than Ruud (no pun intended
)
I guess, maybe he is not the most brilliant striker, but certainly the most complete.
i think Arsenal has been the most entertaining team to watch that i've ever seen. They are definitely the most fluid team i've seen in while
Reyes and Toure, Adelairde (sp?), Clichy, and Lauren will grow into their strengths, Keown and Parlour are already bench players.
Reyes has shown he can shine and fill (well not really, but who can) Bergkamp's shoes.
when Viera is healthy he is one of the top 10 midfielders and Pires is so essential in his utility that he wins my vote for most underrated.
Man U will be strong, they always are, but they lack leadership, Keane is too old, Giggs is brilliant but NOT a leader, same with Scholes.
Forlan is awful no matter how talented he is, and Fletcher to me is very poor.
can't argue with Ronaldo.
fact of the matter is, Man U needs Beckham, not for his skill, but for his leadership.
Chelsea has too much talent (think dallas mavericks) and not enough Frank Lampard
, their best players are the guys who've been there all along.
tho adrian mutu will be brilliant.