Loving[MAX]Sound
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2009
- Posts
- 609
- Likes
- 78
Surprisingly I have ventured out to see what differences between the original SR80 and the SR80i there is. I found the cup was mushroom as opposed to the bowls of the original but nothing else until I stumbled onto a picture from google on the new SR80i and then I saw it. The cup and outer diaphragm is different.
I took a snap of my original SR80 and compared to the new SR80i found on the web (see below)
SR80i
Original SR80's
I wonder sonically what this results in cause I find my SR80 amazing yet what I read when some users compared here on head-fi between SR80i and RS1 they stated to their word that the SR80i was poo but I find that very wrong with my SR80's. I wonder to what extent users/reviewers describe audio and how subjective it really is and whether the wood diaphragm creates more the placebo effect in audio comparisons. As always YMMV but audio commentary is never easy and as I always say trust your ears and hear for yourself if you can.
For the record my Grado SR80's do not sound like poo and this review is more akin to reality. Perhaps in the future I will do a woody on my plastics to hear what all the fuss is about.
Good luck everyone with your audio journeys
You SR80 photo tripped me out without the button on the air vent, at first I thought it was an Alessandro Music Series 1.