average_joe
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2008
- Posts
- 5,394
- Likes
- 299
Quote:
Franck told me the Shure triple flange fold in the ears and compress the sound, and another owner I know agrees. The Shure triple flange tips I have don't seal well for me.
Quote:
And that same person also has the DBA-02, which he says is extremely good, especially for the price. However, the SM3 (which he received Saturday) is a clear step up from the DBA-02. I am still contemplating getting the DBA-02, but I am selling everything else as I don't want to go down, so why?
Oh, and Comply foam lasts me a month tops and I keep my ears clean. No comment on the x-Jays
Quote:
You too! Some day we will both be listening to our S:flo2 and Pico Slim.
Quote:
Quote:
All is cool, much ado about nothing
Quote:
Quote:
@ search, yes, you nailed it (like usual). I have my thoughts on the MDs v the SM3, but have not A/Bed the Copper, CK90Pro, or RE252 vs. the SM3 (at least more than 5 minutes each). To be honest, I am not so sure how much I want to compare anymore since I have come to the realization that the SM3 is the most accurate reproduction of the music I have heard. To my ears, preference for how I want to hear the music, and how technically excellent the SM3 is the comparison is hard to do and not really fair.
Now, I have done a comparison of the Copper and FX700. To my ears, the Copper is better in the upper half of the spectrum, so some male vocals and female vocals sound better on the Copper to me, and the FX700 lower half is better, tighter bass with more detail and better speed. The FX700 soundstage width is nice and much bigger with the FX700, but the Copper is more 3D (and with the HUD-MX1 to Rx the Copper space does increase a lot).
If people remember the confusion from the top-tier thread as to how I was describing the SM3 soundstage, I am not hearing it like my other IEMs. My thoughts have gone from what top-tier IEM do I want to listen to today so I can hear their specialty to how fast will I be able to get my SM3s repaired/replaced should something happen to them.
I have some Shure triple flange (which seems to me the same to the Ety's), I tried on them but don't really like them. Not that the triple flanges mess up the sound, but I can't get a good fit with them.
Franck told me the Shure triple flange fold in the ears and compress the sound, and another owner I know agrees. The Shure triple flange tips I have don't seal well for me.
Quote:
I have to agree one have to take extra care with the comply tips if you want them to last longer. I clean my ear canals with wet q-tips before I insert the foam tips into my ears. So even though I am using mine for 2 months and they are becoming soft now, they are still as clean as new
For the sake of your wallet, I suggest at least wait until the x-jays to be releasedThough I am very satisfied with my SM3 now, I couldn't help but have my eyes on the x-jays.
And there are the Radius and Fischer Audio...
And that same person also has the DBA-02, which he says is extremely good, especially for the price. However, the SM3 (which he received Saturday) is a clear step up from the DBA-02. I am still contemplating getting the DBA-02, but I am selling everything else as I don't want to go down, so why?
Oh, and Comply foam lasts me a month tops and I keep my ears clean. No comment on the x-Jays
Quote:
Well, I am holding off any further purchase until I get my pico slim and the sflo2, which might not be so soon in the foreseeable few weeks...
Besides, I think the x-jays will still take quite some time before it's even on retail, so my wallet is safe for now
You too! Some day we will both be listening to our S:flo2 and Pico Slim.
Quote:
This is suppose to be forum that exchanges ideas and knowledge so I thought? Happy listening.
Quote:
Cheers
All is cool, much ado about nothing
Quote:
hmm. curious for a comparison with the monsters turbines(copper/MDs) that was never inserted hehe- though it seems like they're already a step behind the FX-700/SM3s
and just for clarification: these are BAs right?
Quote:
YES, The SM3 are BA......I would imagine that Joe has not had time to Finalize his thoughts comparing the SM3 to the MD's/Coppers, I can't really speak for Joe, I'm sure he will reveal his thoughts soon enough, he does have an opinion though.
@ search, yes, you nailed it (like usual). I have my thoughts on the MDs v the SM3, but have not A/Bed the Copper, CK90Pro, or RE252 vs. the SM3 (at least more than 5 minutes each). To be honest, I am not so sure how much I want to compare anymore since I have come to the realization that the SM3 is the most accurate reproduction of the music I have heard. To my ears, preference for how I want to hear the music, and how technically excellent the SM3 is the comparison is hard to do and not really fair.
Now, I have done a comparison of the Copper and FX700. To my ears, the Copper is better in the upper half of the spectrum, so some male vocals and female vocals sound better on the Copper to me, and the FX700 lower half is better, tighter bass with more detail and better speed. The FX700 soundstage width is nice and much bigger with the FX700, but the Copper is more 3D (and with the HUD-MX1 to Rx the Copper space does increase a lot).
If people remember the confusion from the top-tier thread as to how I was describing the SM3 soundstage, I am not hearing it like my other IEMs. My thoughts have gone from what top-tier IEM do I want to listen to today so I can hear their specialty to how fast will I be able to get my SM3s repaired/replaced should something happen to them.