juni0r71
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- May 14, 2014
- Posts
- 8
- Likes
- 10
Does the DX90 charge while connected to the computer in DAC mode?
Yes
Does the DX90 charge while connected to the computer in DAC mode?
Yea, but another amp can probably shape the sound in a different way than the internal amp that might be more pleasing to some people. I've recently heard an external amp that say vs internal iphone amp can pull a soundstage and images therein towards the vertical plane, ie producing more soundstage height at the expense of some width. For some earphones, this is a welcome change that I'd choose as a preference.
I think that my words get read as 'sound better' when all I say reference is performance. Performance does not equate to preference. I know a lot of audiophiles that dig valves. Hell, I dig them. And valves always suffer compressed stereo separation, higher THD, IMD, etc. and noise floors that good solid state circuits would never approach. But they sound good to those that like them. They do not perform good, though. So I agree, some amps add flavour. But I stand by what I said, you will not get an external amp to outperform the DX90 with your favourite earphones at safe listening levels. It won't happen. The LO is a fine thing, but the amp itself will not be able to approach the PERFORMANCE of the DX90's headphone output whilst driving earphones. It is an amazing internal circuit. Whether a person likes it or not doesn't bother me. I could care less. I do like it- quite a bit in fact. But I won't put an amp up to the DX90 unless I like the way it degrades sound performance into a pleasing patina.
I think that my words get read as 'sound better' when all I say reference is performance. Performance does not equate to preference. I know a lot of audiophiles that dig valves. Hell, I dig them. And valves always suffer compressed stereo separation, higher THD, IMD, etc. and noise floors that good solid state circuits would never approach. But they sound good to those that like them. They do not perform good, though. So I agree, some amps add flavour. But I stand by what I said, you will not get an external amp to outperform the DX90 with your favorite earphones at safe listening levels. It won't happen. The LO is a fine thing, but the amp itself will not be able to approach the PERFORMANCE of the DX90's headphone output whilst driving earphones. It is an amazing internal circuit. Whether a person likes it or not doesn't bother me. I could care less. I do like it- quite a bit in fact. But I won't put an amp up to the DX90 unless I like the way it degrades sound performance into a pleasing patina.
how much and does it fit OK.
Can you define the PERFORMANCE you are saying? It seems you do include S/N and stereo separation as PERFORMANCE factors.
One can take the identical DX90 internal amp circuit design, moving all the opamps/capacitors/resistors to an bigger external circuit board with wider copper traces, better shielding and independent power supply, and achieve a lower stereo crosstalk figure. And this better stereo crosstalk PERFORMANCE factor alone contributes to the obvious sound stage and instrument separation which nearly every DX90 + external amp users experience.
External amps does not just add flavor (like you tube amp theory) and power (you said external amp just adds voltage). To the very least they allow real estate for better circuit design over the internal amp which has to be cramped in a 2cm x 3cm circuit board area which also share the power source with the DX90 DAC circuit section.
You can't increase the size of the tracks in the chips and I guarantee that there's more resistance and other electrical characteristics in the cable, V control and connections used in/for an external amp and really, the only places to use heavier tracks are current related positions like PS and amp out. I bet it's been addressed. You're allowed to prefer an external amp but there's no good 'reason' for it to be better if what's there is neutral and drives it's intended load.
Okay, so I freely admit that I'm not nearly the tech-savvy audiophile that most of you guy seem to be. I'm primarily here to lurk and learn because I can't "talk shop" on a level with the big boys. Disclaimer aside, I have questions that seems appropriately timed, given the current dispute about external amplification in the thread. I love my DX90. I absolutely love it. I've never heard instrumental separation like this in my entire life and to call the clarity outstanding is an understatement that borders on insult. The one issue I have with it—and this may well be the result of an iffy IEM pairing and/or lackluster mastering—is that while the low end is present and accurate it sometimes lacks the impact I prefer. I don't get a lot in the way of obvious sub-bass, in particular.
I'm not the type of basshead who would shell out for cannons or even Velodyne vPulses but I'd like the option of dialing up the bass a notch or two. I'd like to get some opinions from the majority of you regarding eternal portable amplifiers and the DX90. Specifically, I'm looking to spend no more than about $150 right now and I want to maintain as much accuracy as possible in the mix while boosting the lower frequencies. I'd really like to avoid bass bleed or drowning out my highs/mids.
1) Yes or no—does it make good sense to use an external amplifier with the DX90 to reshape the sound signature in the way I've described above?
2) What brands/models would you recommend for this, if any?
Thanks in advance to anyone who's willing to take a few minutes to educate a noob.
...... The one issue I have with it—and this may well be the result of an iffy IEM pairing and/or lackluster mastering—is that while the low end is present and accurate it sometimes lacks the impact I prefer. I don't get a lot in the way of obvious sub-bass, in particular.
Okay, so I freely admit that I'm not nearly the tech-savvy audiophile that most of you guy seem to be. I'm primarily here to lurk and learn because I can't "talk shop" on a level with the big boys. Disclaimer aside, I have questions that seems appropriately timed, given the current dispute about external amplification in the thread. I love my DX90. I absolutely love it. I've never heard instrumental separation like this in my entire life and to call the clarity outstanding is an understatement that borders on insult. The one issue I have with it—and this may well be the result of an iffy IEM pairing and/or lackluster mastering—is that while the low end is present and accurate it sometimes lacks the impact I prefer. I don't get a lot in the way of obvious sub-bass, in particular.
I'm not the type of basshead who would shell out for cannons or even Velodyne vPulses but I'd like the option of dialing up the bass a notch or two. I'd like to get some opinions from the majority of you regarding eternal portable amplifiers and the DX90. Specifically, I'm looking to spend no more than about $150 right now and I want to maintain as much accuracy as possible in the mix while boosting the lower frequencies. I'd really like to avoid bass bleed or drowning out my highs/mids.
1) Yes or no—does it make good sense to use an external amplifier with the DX90 to reshape the sound signature in the way I've described above?
2) What brands/models would you recommend for this, if any?
Thanks in advance to anyone who's willing to take a few minutes to educate a noob.