Kees
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2006
- Posts
- 4,619
- Likes
- 26
So you put square wheels under your Porche and then tell us Porche sucks...... and then you think your opinion could be of interest to anybody?
So you put square wheels under your Porche and then tell us Porche sucks...... and then you think your opinion could be of interest to anybody?
Aren't you a genius. Might want to look back in this thread, the main LCD-2 thread, and the D7000 thread, where a few people asked me to post impressions knowing what I was running them through. I promise next time I post impressions about your favorite headphone, I'll make sure to not only bold and underline, but use size 72 font on the part that says to "take this review as it is, the LCD-2 through an amp not good enough for it." Then hopefully you won't glance over it while you're fuming at the sheer thought that someone doesn't appreciate a pair of headphones when run through a meager amplifier, but understands that others with proper amplification may.
I know they asked, but YOU give an opinion on the LDC2 based on driving it on square wheels, I think thats pretty stupid don't you think?
The thing about all these planar/orthos is this - they really can't sound very good unless driven properly. With many other headphones, you can get a good portion of what the headphone will deliver with almost any amp. Even the T1 I agree sounds pretty good with almost any amp (although it scales up with the good stuff). But if you underpower a planar, it flat out doesn't sound good. Period. And I have heard some expensive amps that were not up to the task, since they lacked enough power.
It is entirely possible that even with a terrific amp, you won't like the LCD-2. There are quite a few people that don't. However, unless you have an amp that will drive them properly, you won't really know whether you would have liked them or not.
Hmm, this discussion makes me wonder, what is needed to make it worthwile to buy T1 and/or LCD-2.
Yes, we know D7000's are very easy to drive, we also know T1 is not extremely demanding but will show flaws in the chain, plus that Hifiman's like HE-6 need beasts to power them.
But where does the LCD-2 stand in between this exactly.
Or in my specific case, Audio GD NFB-3 with C-2.1 (offcourse FLAC source, decent cables etc.), I guess it's worthwhile to buy T1's, but can my rig also power LCD-2 decently?
Maybe there are better threads to ask, but since it's discussed here, amping and LCD-2....
I'll decide what I do with my money and audio gear, thanks. I never said either headphone is bad. I said the LCD-2 sound horrible through an E9 because it does. I'm sure it sounds phenomenal through your multi-thousand dollar amps, that's why it's #1 ranked here, but I'm only providing my experience because a few users asked me too. Sorry if that offends you.
As for the T1, I've given nothing but praise for it. The soundstage, transparency, detail, natural sound, and neutrality are incredible. It's the NEUTRALITY that I personally do not enjoy. I like a forward, upfront, energetic, involving, joyful, headbanging kind of sound that comes from colored cans. And I'm not the only one, refer to the two T1 reviews here that found them joyless with much better amps than mine. Note that I also did not agree with them at first, it's only after I went back to my Denons for a bit did I discover my preference.
^ many thanks for your effort Frank
I was wondering mostly, if my DAC/Amp combo can power LCD-2 decently.
I'm getting T1's for sure. (indeed probably a very nice open companion to D7000's and also Ed.8's)
Maybe there will come a time I'll buy a Lyr to power Hifimans, but that's not now, so I'm curious as to if it's worthwhile at this point to get LCD-2's.