A Disturbing Behind-the-Gender Leer at DAPs
Sep 11, 2004 at 7:40 AM Thread Starter Post #1 of 47

scrypt

Head-Fi's Sybil
Joined
Jan 22, 2002
Posts
2,382
Likes
125
Today, whilst lacing my iPod into its faux tie-dyed puce-and-vermilion silicone Lajo-manufactured corset and positioning its urine-tinted iMonocle just so, I suffered a revelation. It occurred to me that, for a queue of months so interminable as to astound the Department of Motor Vehicles, I had been indulging in a vice so objectionably frothy, a habit so infernally dainty, that I might as well dance about with a megaphone shrieking "Jerome never looked lovelier": I'd been dressing an alabaster-skinned lady-friendly DAP in little outfits. Flummoxed, I gaped at my iPod and understood that every manicurist in Singapore would happily engage in the same activity. What in Thumbelina's name had I been doing, let alone thinking? We might as well admit it, I concluded. DAPs (read: Delectable Audio Princesses) are dolls for men.

Men have always concealed their own feminine interests from themselves through the obvious but effective use of *non sequitur distinctions*. We are fascinated by shiny jewelry but can't admit it, therefore we apply the irrelevant question of scale to assert masculinity. "Irene, this Movado watch might appear identical to yours, but don't be deceived. Everyone knows it is a man-friendly tool of virility because -- need you be reminded? -- it is nearly an inch larger."

The same strategy is sometimes applied to the iPod mini: "How can Phil brandish that blue perfume dispenser with an LCD in public when everyone knows it's smaller than the stubble-inflected Lacrosse-stick-wielding iPod and has fewer gigabits?"

Similarly, we use the idea of functionality to dismiss charges that we like to costume our side-intelligencer-mates in outfits made of rubber, silicone and leather: "Really, Naomi, have you christened your forehead with a fleur-de-lis-shaped decanter of gold-flecked liqueur? This is not some poupee a la mode, wife o' mine, this an audio player; it is functional; I'm not attaching an orange vinyl hoodie with nylons to my iHP-120, I'm protecting my investment. Can't you see these impossibly expensive accessories will save money in the long run? That's why I own the same mini-to-RCA cord cruller in seventeen utilitarian lipstick-complimenting hues."

By the bye, I no longer own an iPod or any of its psychologically revealing accessories. That's right -- as soon as I realized what I'd been doing, I threw them away to show I'm not emotionally invested in the subject.
 
Sep 11, 2004 at 7:54 AM Post #2 of 47
I had no problem dressing up dolls. Except I called them "Robots." Don't kid yourselves - when you played with Transformers, it's a very similar experience to playing with dolls.
Although perhaps my friend crossed the line when he bought me a Princess doll from Battle of the Planets. My sister was happy to take that off my hands.
Feel free to call the ipod a girlish item if you like - just like the Mini/VW Bug is, or the Waterfield Imotion bag can be called a man-purse.

There is no shame in Accessorizing. Metrosexuals, unite!
 
Sep 11, 2004 at 8:08 AM Post #3 of 47
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jahn
I had no problem dressing up dolls. Except I called them "Robots." Don't kid yourselves - when you played with Transformers, it's a very similar experience to playing with dolls. . . . Feel free to call the ipod a girlish item if you like - just like the Mini/VW Bug is, or the Waterfield Imotion bag can be called a man-purse.


I savor your judiciously applied commas (nicely done!) and admire your periods (lobes out of the atrine-lay, redshifter), but am not certain I approve of your brazen use of the virgule. Your controversial deployment of hyphens and quote marks confounds me completely (though I do apologize in advance for my inserted ellipses).
 
Sep 11, 2004 at 8:11 AM Post #4 of 47
tuberoller have got something to say about this.

i really hate it when people say you have to do this or what to be a man. cut my hair and s*** like that. which only lead to sexist ideas.

ipod in this case, i have to admit is designed for the attraction purpose. you literally threw it away?
 
Sep 11, 2004 at 8:15 AM Post #6 of 47
Quote:

Originally Posted by scrypt
I savor your judiciously applied commas (nicely done!) and admire your periods (lobes out of the atrine-lay, redshifter), but am not certain I approve of your brazen use of the virgule. Your controversial deployment of hyphens and quote marks confounds me completely (though I do apologize in advance for my inserted ellipses).


Hey, that reminded me of a short piece Steve Martin wrote in his book, "Shopgirl." It was written in the context that there was a punctuation shortage - specifically, the shortage of the Period. He wrote the entire piece using only one period. I'll give you one guess where that period was!
 
Sep 11, 2004 at 8:19 AM Post #7 of 47
Frankly, I don't think a man with an interest in action figures ought to be discussing the insertion of end punctuation in a thread as virile as this. Yes, I know I did exactly the same thing, but, really, that was different. When you flip off its head, my Lady Murasaki Aikido Extermination Buddy becomes a floss dispenser.
 
Sep 11, 2004 at 8:21 AM Post #8 of 47
I admit, I might not be manly enough to end this pointedly, but I can at least do so with a flourish and a readily available emoticon
evil_smiley.gif
 
Sep 11, 2004 at 8:24 AM Post #9 of 47
STOP THIS NOW! I'm laughing my guts out! My betrothed is in the other room attempting to sleep!!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top