Schiit Jotunheim Review / Preview - Head-Fi TV
Oct 1, 2016 at 11:53 AM Post #1,531 of 6,472
Jotunheim has been on for almost 24 hours. It is a lot warmer than it was just after being turned on the first time. I am actually very surprised. It is very nuetral but has a warm signature to me.

I just put the HD650 up for sale here, did not like them at all. They had some nice qualities but didn't care for the treble roll off and dark sound.

The Jot with my T90 is a brillaint pairing. Enjoying it very much. My next can is going to be the HD800.
 
Oct 1, 2016 at 12:53 PM Post #1,534 of 6,472
   
Short version - buy it.
 
Long version - buy it now.
 
In all seriousness, it's the my favourite pairing so far and I've got plenty of headphones (more expensive than the 650s) to choose from.

 
Ah good, so you liked it in the end, after all that discussion?  
smily_headphones1.gif
 
 
 
Jotunheim has been on for almost 24 hours. It is a lot warmer than it was just after being turned on the first time. I am actually very surprised. It is very nuetral but has a warm signature to me.

I just put the HD650 up for sale here, did not like them at all. They had some nice qualities but didn't care for the treble roll off and dark sound.

The Jot with my T90 is a brillaint pairing. Enjoying it very much. My next can is going to be the HD800.

 
Without wishing to seem rude, you just eschewed the obviously best pairing for this amp, and are now planning a far more expensive bad pairing, it's a little perplexing. I suppose it takes all sorts, but still... 
 
Also, I question your ears, if you're hearing it running "warm" after leaving it on. It doesn't change much, and is a rather neutral amp. Maybe you should keep a pair of neutral-ish cans around to help you calibrate your ears sometimes, I think they're haunted 
biggrin.gif

 
Oct 1, 2016 at 12:54 PM Post #1,535 of 6,472
   
About as significant as it gets, in my opinion. Have owned both (albeit briefly as I wasn't happy with the O2) at the office and they're just in different leagues - especially once you factor in all the functionalities and connections, etc. that the Jotunheim offers. Given how they're priced there's no contest.

Haha that has me more interested in this now. If you could could you elaborate what the difference between the two are? Was the O2 more sterile and less natural sounding? Also can you use iems with this, was wondering if I'll run into channel imbalance issues cause my knob is only slightly turned on the 02 and its already loud. Ty.
 
Oct 1, 2016 at 1:04 PM Post #1,536 of 6,472
Ah good, so you liked it in the end, after all that discussion?  :)  



Without wishing to seem rude, you just eschewed the obviously best pairing for this amp, and are now planning a far more expensive bad pairing, it's a little perplexing. I suppose it takes all sorts, but still... 

Also, I question your ears, if you're hearing it running "warm" after leaving it on. It doesn't change much, and is a rather neutral amp. Maybe you should keep a pair of neutral-ish cans around to help you calibrate your ears sometimes, I think they're haunted :D


Its funny how we wish others would like what we like and berate them when they don't. There is no objective "best" pairing for the Jot. Its just opinion/taste, and everybody has different ear drums.
 
Oct 1, 2016 at 1:06 PM Post #1,537 of 6,472
 
Also, I question your ears, if you're hearing it running "warm" after leaving it on. It doesn't change much, and is a rather neutral amp. Maybe you should keep a pair of neutral-ish cans around to help you calibrate your ears sometimes, I think they're haunted 
biggrin.gif

T90 is brighter than hd650.
Jot is just a hair bright, internal dac making it more bright.
 
Based on Colt throwing out the hd650, and liking the T90, we can only assume his personal preference is bright.
In that vain, he'll probably love the hd800 with it, take the 6khz spike and shove it right into your ear, some people like that tho, not knocking it. 
 
I think the only confusion he has, is no baseline. Because he is referencing pretty much universally reviewed things that are "bright" as "warm".
Who knows, eh. 
 
Oct 1, 2016 at 1:09 PM Post #1,538 of 6,472
T90 is brighter than hd650.
Jot is just a hair bright, internal dac making it more bright.

Based on Colt throwing out the hd650, and liking the T90, we can only assume his personal preference is bright.
In that vain, he'll probably love the hd800 with it, take the 6khz spike and shove it right into your ear, some people like that tho, not knocking it. 

I think the only confusion he has, is no baseline. Because he is referencing pretty much universally reviewed things that are "bright" as "warm".
Who knows, eh. 


My preference is actually neutral but I don't mind bright. But the T90s are not nearly as bright as say, the DT880, they are fairly warm in comparison. Look, I know I hurt your feelings by not fellating the 650, but come on guys, a little fair and balanced!
 
Oct 1, 2016 at 1:15 PM Post #1,539 of 6,472
My preference is actually neutral but I don't mind bright. But the T90s are not nearly as bright as say, the DT880, they are fairly warm in comparison. Look, I know I hurt your feelings by not fellating the 650, but come on guys, a little fair and balanced!


To my ears the t90 is brighter than dt880 by a fair margin.

Not to be a thorn, but I think your preferences are bright, not neutral. You are posting like crazy all over the forums these days and everyone can see you are preferring a bright signature.
 
Oct 1, 2016 at 1:23 PM Post #1,540 of 6,472
To my ears the t90 is brighter than dt880 by a fair margin.

Not to be a thorn, but I think your preferences are bright, not neutral. You are posting like crazy all over the forums these days and everyone can see you are preferring a bright signature.


One of my favorite headphones was the HD600 which has a more neutral signature. The only reason I sold it was because it did not offer the technical abilities I needed to handle complex orchestral passages. The T90 were a fairly cheap alternative to the HD800 or T1 so I got them used on head fi. I did not care for the overly treble happy nature but that was only a problem 5-10% otf the time. The other 90% saw it performing brilliantly at exactly what I wanted in my classical stuff. So my preference is neutral but I will take the technicalities even if it means brighter. Please stop presuming to know what I prefer. If the HD600 did what I needed I would never have gotten rid of them.

I also see you are eager to jump on the 650 hype train since you want to buy my 650. Have you heard them before? Don't make the same mistake I did. What signature do you prefer?
 
Oct 1, 2016 at 1:26 PM Post #1,541 of 6,472
   
I think the only confusion he has, is no baseline. Because he is referencing pretty much universally reviewed things that are "bright" as "warm".
Who knows, eh. 

 
Exactly what I was getting at!
 
 
Its funny how we wish others would like what we like and berate them when they don't. There is no objective "best" pairing for the Jot. Its just opinion/taste, and everybody has different ear drums.

 
Believe me, dude, if I were getting at you, there'd be no room for doubt. No, I am just amused at your flip-flopping; if you're happy, that's fine. It may confuse others, though.
 
Oct 1, 2016 at 1:27 PM Post #1,542 of 6,472
Not wishing to fan the flames but I've always seen "bright" and "warm" as overly-subjective broad-brush descriptors with too much room for interpretation/misunderstanding.  Perhaps I'm in the minority, but IMO it would be helpful to know which parts of the frequency spectrum are causing the perceived brightness or warmth in the item being described.  e.g. take a headphone that boosts between 5kHz and 10kHz and another that boosts between 10kHz and 20kHz, would it be appropriate to describe them both simply as "bright" even though the different areas of HF emphasis will give them VERY different sonic characters? 
 
Oct 1, 2016 at 1:27 PM Post #1,543 of 6,472
One of my favorite headphones was the HD600 which has a more neutral signature. The only reason I sold it was because it did not offer the technical abilities I needed to handle complex orchestral passages. The T90 were a fairly cheap alternative to the HD800 or T1 so I got them used on head fi. I did not care for the overly treble happy nature but that was only a problem 5-10% otf the time. The other 90% saw it performing brilliantly at exactly what I wanted in my classical stuff. So my preference is neutral but I will take the technicalities even if it means brighter. Please stop presuming to know what I prefer. If the HD600 did what I needed I would never have gotten rid of them.

I also see you are eager to jump on the 650 hype train since you want to buy my 650. Have you heard them before? Don't make the same mistake I did. What signature do you prefer?


Yes, thanks for the response:) No 650 hype train. Been through many, many headphones and wanted a pair of 650 for years now. I like all signatures, different signatures to fit different moods. Probably a warmer signature is my ultimate preference.
 
Oct 1, 2016 at 1:30 PM Post #1,544 of 6,472
Not wishing to fan the flames but I've always seen "bright" and "warm" as overly-subjective broad-brush descriptors with too much room for interpretation/misunderstanding.  Perhaps I'm in the minority, but IMO it would be helpful to know which parts of the frequency spectrum are causing the perceived brightness or warmth in the item being described.  e.g. take a headphone that boosted between 5kHz and 10kHz and another that boosted between 10kHz and 20kHz, would it be appropriate to describe them both simply as "bright" even though the different portions of HF emphasis will give them VERY different sonic characters? 


Yes, its a fairly murky area people like to get dogmatic and sensitive about. This is further heightened by the fact that different amps, DACs and cables will slightly alter a headphone's coloration.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top