It is almost like you can't even comment mentioning that some headphones need more power to shine and that power is not provided by the Hugo alone. Once you mention this someone or the other will explain inaudible harmonic distortion that is introduced. Why is it difficult to understand that some headphones actually need more power to shine than what the hugo can provide? It's like you can't even have your opinions based on your own listening without someone trying to prove you wrong and tell you that the whole idea of more power is a fallacy.
Is the Hugo a very clean sounding device sufficient for many headphones? Yes. Can better sound be had on some headphones by introducing an external amplifier with the Hugo? Yes.
I used the Schiit Mjolnir with the LCD-X.
Hugo couldn't even get near the same neighborhood.
I also paired the X with the Hugo + Mass Kobo 404. Not good.
I've been there
@Jozurr -- it's almost as if there's a certain taboo in mentioning anything bad about these pairings.
I've heard better -- whilst that may be subjective, the criteria aren't. Clarity, instrument separation, bass tightness, sub-bass reach, they're all leagues ahead of what the Hugo alone can push out.
Then again, I got lynched by Headfi engineers and scientists when I said that there are better usb cables...