well the audio vivid makes a big difference imo, especially to some of my grungier discs which i will conceed needed a good cleaning of any kind.
to run a balanced comparison, to which i will go into detail at another time, i will say this:
I am just running a new UNTREATED cd in my other system which is a NAD cdp and a NAD reciever. Neither of them have been treated by the wlaker audio SST.
Here is what HAS been treated: 1. the prongs of my power conditioner and 2. the banana plugs on my speaker cables (both ends)
again, this is equipment that i have been using regularly for over a year and i am very familiar with the sound.
So back to my story, now that that is out of the way.
apparantly the SST makes a big difference, even without the vivid.
my system has better imaging than it has ever had, with alot more sparkle in the highs in a good way.
especially noticable after the application of the SST was the location of cymbals/high hats/brushes.
that would be the biggest change id say..
so this isnt a full review, nor is it intended to be, but its nice to know that PRIOR to using the Audio Vivid, and ONLY using the SST on treated cables results are there...
its audible, having my somewhat unsuspecting non audio roommate cooperate as a guinea pig
and these improvements aren't minor to me. apparantly i didnt know how degraded my audio quality was from worn posts and plug ends....
step 2: treating the entire NAD stytem including the plugs and ICs and treating these new discs with vivid....
more to follow...
Sean