Yep! I don't use my other cans much any more, the 940's do everything I ask for every genre better than any of them (with the exception of the 225i's for poorly recorded rock/metal) with less coloration. They are the most "speaker-like" cans I've heard in terms of overall refinement, sophistication, and neutrality.
The bass is just fine btw.
I don't understand complaints about it, it makes me wonder if those who find it lacking have ever heard a decent 2.0 speaker setup without sub or low-fi boomy bass found in cheapo or overcolored setups. When I listen to bass heavy music or a movie soundtrack the bass is there and plentiful...even surprisingly so. When I don't, it isn't as it's not supposed to be. Just like on any decent to superb 2.0 speaker setup I've had or have heard.
My only complaint about these, and they have not changed at all in sound since the first day I got them, is that they can sound somewhat "dry". That is hard to describe but I find it there nonetheless. But they are not overly bright (and I can hear at least up to 19k as tested by a medical lab not even a year ago) or anything else.
I also really like the way they look and the construction is just fine. The comfort isn't as good as my 702's, but it is still fine for hours on end, only a little clampy after awhile.
Really great cans at least and there is no need for me to look to "upgrade" for a long while, if even ever imo (I do listen to speakers about 80% of the time, but even if I didn't I think I could be quite satisfied with these for years without needing to look for "better").
PS: The 940's have been compared to the BD 880/600's briefly here
http://www.headfonia.com/shure-srh-940-detail-monster/ (and in the comments more I think) and the 940's are said to have better mids/vocals. I've never heard the 880's but having the 940's I have no desire to.