Quote:
Originally Posted by erin /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Slim, thanks for the link and all your hard work, its been an interesting read.
Are you sure that the 14 bit resolution refers to the CM108 driver, it seemed to only be for the CMI 8738 driver, which seems to be different.
After looking at the link you gave: Homebrew CMI 8738 drivers - Hydrogenaudio Forums
I read something about a dogbert driver for these CMI 8738 ICs.
I tried to install it but it seems that these drivers don't work with the CM108 which makes me think that the 14 bits test only referred to the other driver for the older C-media IC...
I use i2s output from the Teralink, do you think this is affected as well as the SPDIF? the C-media driver i use 5.12.8.1803 allows me to turn off the SPDIF, I find that this gives better sound quality when using the i2s.
Funny thing is that i have heard a 14 bit NOS dac and it did sound dynamically limited and like the sound was changed, but my 16 bit dac does not sound like this is happening when i use the teralink. But i have noted your meaurements about the SN ratio of the CM108 driver. Perplexing....
|
You are right, the 14 bits is about a slightly different c-media driver. However, they all seem to loose resolution in comparison to the generic windows drivers.
I tried different configurations with the c-media v.5.12.8.2119 driver, and I would estimate roughly its resolution to 15 bits (from the diffrent measurements done with RMAA). The generic windows, which seems to be bit perfect, achieves 16 bit resolution.
The c-media might sound "good" with some NOS dacs, but as far as I could tell, it messes with the data and reduces resolution in my system.
NOS DACs (such as the valab) have higher noise and distortion that probably mask what I heard using my DAC.
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebathingape /img/forum/go_quote.gif
The Cambridge Dacmagic also uses the cm-108 driver, and i have used the windows 7 default driver for a while and it has worked great. I briefly tried the driver which CA recommends and i think it sounded very muddy for some reason in comparison to the default windows 7 driver. It also installs alot of software which I don't need + enables volume control in windows if i remember correctly.
The CA cm-108 recommended driver is here: Customer Care System (which I don't recommend on win7)
The windows 7 default driver version is much newer from July this year and is driver version 6.1.7600.16385.
So we have observed the similar things in sound signature differences I believe.
I have a Musiland 01 USD coming soon so I will compare with that too
|
Well, your findings with Windows 7+ Cambridge mirror mine with Windows XP + Teralink
Quote:
Originally Posted by regal /img/forum/go_quote.gif
is it asychrous?
|
If the Teralink x2 uses the same TE7022L USB streaming controller as the upcoming TeraDak's Chameleon Dac, it should be isochronous.
I found out the data sheet of the TE7022L here :
http://www.gfec.com.tw/word_file/TE7022PB-v14.pdf
My guess is that is that the Teralink X2 will come very close to the Hiface ... However, there is no way to know before trying