regal
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- May 27, 2006
- Posts
- 3,645
- Likes
- 19
Quote:
I would like to try the Hiface, but it is a bit expensive and my laptop project has been put on hold, hopefully by then there will be more asynchrous usb options. I just can't be convinced that any power from the computer can be considered high end low Jitter. I think the Hiface is a fine product but more a step in the right direction and predict in a year or two there will be better options.
But I am investigating using the PCB of the Hiface to replace the USB input on my 19MK3 DAC, that would bypass the SPDIF and provide good power, just not sure I can make it fit.
Read this, these guys are the real experts in Jitter, nothing like the typical marketing snake oil the big DAC vendors pander, The Hiface doesn't have a PS at all resembling this:
http://www.cn.diyhifisupply.com/files/XO-DAC.pdf
Originally Posted by slim.a /img/forum/go_quote.gif Regal, Have you triend the Hiface vs. the Teralink ? 2. The hiface has 2 clocks (One for 44.1 multiples and the second for 48 multiples). The Teralink-x has only one 12mhz clock which means that the 44.1 frequency must be derived from some sort of calculation. . |
I would like to try the Hiface, but it is a bit expensive and my laptop project has been put on hold, hopefully by then there will be more asynchrous usb options. I just can't be convinced that any power from the computer can be considered high end low Jitter. I think the Hiface is a fine product but more a step in the right direction and predict in a year or two there will be better options.
But I am investigating using the PCB of the Hiface to replace the USB input on my 19MK3 DAC, that would bypass the SPDIF and provide good power, just not sure I can make it fit.
Read this, these guys are the real experts in Jitter, nothing like the typical marketing snake oil the big DAC vendors pander, The Hiface doesn't have a PS at all resembling this:
http://www.cn.diyhifisupply.com/files/XO-DAC.pdf