A Twisted Review: HD800's Calculative, Clinical and Sterile Soul
Aug 25, 2009 at 5:03 AM Post #122 of 167
Just when I thought this thread's not going anywhere, I find these two gems that remind me all is not futile in Head-Fidom. Pedalhead and pp312, well said!
beerchug.gif


Quote:

Originally Posted by pedalhead /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Look, there are two ways to review a product...

1. Here's what I think of these headphones...
or
2. Here's what I think of these headphones...and anyone who disagrees is clearly wrong, misguided and/or stupid.

It's not rocket science to work out which is the more useful & respectable method, or what the general reaction might be to each.



Quote:

Originally Posted by pp312 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
The problem with reviewing any hi-fi product is that the product doesn't stand alone: its performance is influenced and perhaps compromised by the products it's required to be used with. But even more: unless you're intimately acquainted with the reviewer (unlikely), there's no way of knowing how well his tastes may accord with yours, or whether indeed his ears hear what yours hear. Also too often reviewers fail to mention the type of music they're using, the specific CDs, which is vitally important. Given all that, reviews should be taken as no more than a basic guide to shortlisting, and then only when several are in agreement.

I've given up taking any notice of reviews. A lot of people here praise the AT AD700. I tried it and simply could not take it seriously: bright, middle recessed, coarse and with a creaky headband. Nothing I heard, even after burn-in, equated even vaguely with the praise showered on it here. If I'd been told it was a $50 model from K-Mart, I'd have thought that just about right. OTOH, the Senn 595 regularly comes in for bashing here but to my ears it's a brilliant phone, one of the few I've ever heard that can give me the illusion of a live orchestra (ditto the 650). If I had taken notice of some of the comments here I'd have gone up many blind alleys, and now when I read similar continuing comments, I shake my head and chuckle in wonderment. I've long given up reading "AD700 or HD595?"-type threads because I know I'm going to have to grit my teeth at all the "AD700 definitely--much better phone" posts. My point? Don't be surprised that others hear something completely different to what your hear, and don't engage in contentious posts about why they're wrong and you're right.

Unless of course you enjoy it. Then it's OK.
smily_headphones1.gif



 
Aug 25, 2009 at 6:27 AM Post #123 of 167
Gee, pleasant surprise. And here I expected to be viciously bashed and left bleeding in the gutter for maligning the AD700.
smily_headphones1.gif


Though it may happen yet...
frown.gif
 
Aug 25, 2009 at 6:36 AM Post #124 of 167
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------uote:
"Originally Posted by pp312
Smellygas has the opposite problem you have with the HD 800 can´t take any positive remarks on it."

Smellygas, I didn't post that. Apart from the fact that it doesn't express my sentiments, it's poorly punctuated.
 
Aug 25, 2009 at 2:06 PM Post #126 of 167
SmellyGas,

You're pretty close to the mark. Except I'd wager in the case of the HD800 it's "get a different source." A half-decent amp and killer source will fix more problems than vice versa. Having awesome headphones and an awesome amp, but not so good source, will produce a really bad sound.

I have experimented with EQ with the 800s for fun, but if I want the old Senn sound back it's just easier for me to put the 650s back on...
 
Aug 25, 2009 at 5:29 PM Post #127 of 167
It seems to me that the importance of the source (digital to analog conversion) are often overlooked on this forum. (Not aimed at you SmellyGas).
 
Aug 25, 2009 at 5:41 PM Post #128 of 167
Quote:

Originally Posted by nor_spoon /img/forum/go_quote.gif
It seems to me that the importance of the source (digital to analog conversion) are often overlooked on this forum. (Not aimed at you SmellyGas).


I agree with this 100%. I'm a big believer in the phrase "crap in/crap out" and believe that quality sound reproduction absolutely must begin with a quality source. That's one reason I still use a one-disk-at-a-time CD player. I was actually shopping for a $500 used CD player when I came across my Denon. I paid way less than my target price and couldn't be happier with it.


On a side note, it was very nice to see this threads tone do a complete 180.
 
Aug 25, 2009 at 7:46 PM Post #129 of 167
Quote:

Originally Posted by cswann1 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
..That's one reason I still use a one-disk-at-a-time CD player.


contrary to multiple discs? does any one use that? or what exactly do you mean? There are many people including me that believe that the best achievable digital quality comes from a Hard Disk Drive rather than a CD transport/player...
 
Aug 25, 2009 at 8:00 PM Post #130 of 167
Quote:

Originally Posted by nor_spoon /img/forum/go_quote.gif
It seems to me that the importance of the source (digital to analog conversion) are often overlooked on this forum. (Not aimed at you SmellyGas).


And some would suggest that too much emphasis is placed on the periphery of one's setup. Someone reports that they didn't like a particular headphone, and thus ensues a fishing expedition that seeks to uncover problems with the listener, problems with his setup, lack of synergy between components, poor interconnects, etc., etc. Some of it approaches the point of absurdity, where the advice is for someone to build a whole new system around their new headphones using so called best-of-breed components.

That is not say that I don't believe in the importance of having good sources, amps, and other components. But I don't accept that by mere virtue of the fact that someone does not like a particular headphone that there must be a causal relationship between other gear in the system and listener dissatisfaction. Is it possible? Of course it is. But oftentimes it is the simplest explanation that is the most accurate, and that might include someone just not liking the way a set of phones sound. And in such cases no amount of remediation to the system is going to change that outcome.

--Jerome
 
Aug 25, 2009 at 8:18 PM Post #131 of 167
Thanks for the review, makes me though again feel I need a pair of L3000 and that hurts the bank 2x as bad as HD800. However, I understand if someone pointblank attacks another, but WHY do people here too often feel personally attacked if something they enjoy is spoken of negatively by another. Its like your headphones become part of yourself and if someone rips on them it is taken as a personal attack.

I though what everyone was after, was the best sound in terms of music enjoyment. Everyone hears differently my fiance likes phones totally opposite from me and enjoys my cheaper Sennheisers more than anything else I own. They are just conduits for music, I know that some people here have valid issues back and forth. But don't let people liek DavidNYC stir you up so much. Lets it be.
biggrin.gif
 
Aug 25, 2009 at 8:54 PM Post #132 of 167
I've read a bit of the HD800 threads and never thought of the HD800 proponents as being defensive about the HD800. They're just giving friendly advice on what they think is the best way to use the headphones which is very important information. It would be nice if manufacturers would say what they think is the best type of equipment to use with their headphones, what those headphones are good for and what they are bad at, etc, so people don't have to guess synergies or take other people's advice at face value. It's only natural people try to find good synergy (especially cheap ones) with headphones to make it easier for others to enjoy the headphones. If you don't want to take their advice about what they think is best for the HD800 then don't take it, it won't offend them because no one really expects you to buy more things unless you decide to yourself.
 
Aug 25, 2009 at 8:57 PM Post #133 of 167
Quote:

Originally Posted by GuyDebord /img/forum/go_quote.gif
contrary to multiple discs? does any one use that? or what exactly do you mean? There are many people including me that believe that the best achievable digital quality comes from a Hard Disk Drive rather than a CD transport/player...


No not contrary to a CD changer, but contrary to a PC like you mentioned. And you are probably right. With a HDD & high-end DAC the analog signal you get is most likely as good, or better as with a high end CD transport and DAC.
For me though, it was a matter of placement of my headphone rig. I wanted it in my bedroom, and my PC is in my office. I suppose I could have bought a high quality DAC and set up my desktop as a media server and used my laptop as a link to my DAC->amp->cans through my wireless router, but it just seemed easier to get a CD/SACD player for the bedroom.
 
Aug 25, 2009 at 9:17 PM Post #134 of 167
Quote:

Originally Posted by haloxt /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I've read a bit of the HD800 threads and never thought of the HD800 proponents as being defensive about the HD800. They're just giving friendly advice on what they think is the best way to use the headphones which is very important information.


To be honest, this is how I have read most of the posts.


Quote:

Originally Posted by haloxt /img/forum/go_quote.gif
It would be nice if manufacturers would say what they think is the best type of equipment to use with their headphones, what those headphones are good for and what they are bad at, etc, so people don't have to guess synergies or take other people's advice at face value. It's only natural people try to find good synergy (especially cheap ones) with headphones to make it easier for others to enjoy the headphones. If you don't want to take their advice about what they think is best for the HD800 then don't take it, it won't offend them because no one really expects you to buy more things unless you decide to yourself.


I don't think this is a good idea really.

It's not really fair for a headphone manufacturer to favour one headphone amp over another.

Also, people have many different ideas as to what is best - if you read the HD 800 threads you will find quite an assortment of amplifiers that people like to use with the headphones - and the same number of people who don't like a recommended amp. and prefer an alternative.

Far better for the manufacturer to let the customer decide what best suits his (or her) personal taste.
 
Aug 25, 2009 at 9:27 PM Post #135 of 167
Quote:

Originally Posted by John Willett /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I don't think this is a good idea really.
It's not really fair for a headphone manufacturer to favour one headphone amp over another.
Far better for the manufacturer to let the customer decide what best suits his (or her) personal taste.



Really? wasnt Sennheiser pairing with Lehmann in the early promotion of the HD800? Arent magazines, including many british like the (now american) hifi+, complying with the Lehmann BCL/HD800 combo suggested by Sennheiser?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top