Brainwavz HM9 is a portable / foldable, super comfortable headphone priced at $150 USD ($119 at the time of writing on Amazon) that surely grabs attention including mine, with it's stylish almost futuristic appearance and 40mm drivers Its sure to please anyone out there looking to purchase something modern, up to date and different from the mainstream crowd. Let me start off by saying I've had an absolute ball reviewing this headphone it's been a real joy to use such is the case with every Brainwavz product I've tried to date. They make to impress, price sensibly and give it their all for the consumer..I'd like to thank Brainwavz and Audrey for the review sample.

Brainwavz Website: http://www.yourbrainwavz.com/index.php



Brainwavz HM9:







Design / Build:

If there's one thing giving HM9 a solid appearance it's the high grade light weight aluminum build quality as you can see the headphone arms are very secure, strong and ready to take a beating, it does come close to 'tank status' all over from  cups to the headband even down to those folding hinges. I've no problem throwing the headphone around in my bag without using the case. The down side to this however is the headphone needs to put all that metal somewhere and comes in at 345 grams.

Moving onto the pads those familiar with Sony's original XB series may see some resemblance here, HM9's pads are thick cushy and oh oh so comfortable, the saying "wearing pillows on my head" couldn't be more true, this also applies with its headband padding. All in all despite being a little on the heavy side the comfort levels are extremely high those thick soft pads on the cups and headband almost work like shock absorbers. It's simply a wonderful well thought out headphone to wear and looks really really cool! I don't know why but in person the headphone actually resembles something almost "Alien', that's just how I feel about it.






 


 



Accessories:

Like all Brainwazs products the package comes with an assortment of accessories, here's what you get:

1.2 meter flat cable (good for outdoor / portable use)
3 meter flat cable (for home amps or studio environments)
1.2 meter cable (with mic and controls for smartphones)
Hard storage case 
Airplane adapter
Storage case Strap (for attaching to the case)
Zip Velcro pocket (for placing inside the case / cable storage)


During my time with HM9 I used the detachable 1.2 meter non mic cable. I feel it does everything I need while not getting in the way, from listening at the computer to on the go 1.2 meters seems the perfect length for placing any MP3 player in my pocket. Each cable clicks in firmly tightly and secure to the left ear cup which I highly doubt will be coming out if unrequested. As you can see these cables have adopted a flat design so tangling and knotting is taken down to a minimum, they're also quite light weight.

Moving onto the hard capsule like storage case it's overly sturdy and could take a good throw around, there is even a little Velcro pocket included for storing your cables which can be stuck anywhere you please inside the case, I really think that's a great idea as you can tell some thought went into the overall package. Another thing I'm impressed with is not needing to detach your cable every time you want to store HM9, it just folds up neatly no problems and pops into the case with cable attached. No fuss simple, pick a cable and stick with it. Other headphones I own like Shure SRH940  you must remove the cable before it fits inside the storage case, I really don't see a point putting wear and tear on the cable entry just for a quick storage procedure and taking up more time, it could mean missing the bus! Good thinking to Brainwavz again!

Also included is an airplane adapter, and a nifty shoulder strap which connects to the storage case, I think this is a great idea as the case can be a little awkward to pick up / hold in one hand, with the added strap it just slides over the shoulder and you be in your way, I also think the capsule like storage case looks absolutely great in person, and when worn over ones shoulder has a certain designer / clothing appeal of it's own, gives a real appeal to the entire package too. When you add the headphones appearance, case and accessories everything combined makes me think "the future". HM9's total package really does have that appeal on me and maybe you too!



 









 



Comfort / isolation:

You may of read me mention in the introduction HM9 has excellent comfort levels, well I can't express anymore just how likable HM9 is to wear. the padded cushions are super super soft and extremely cushy, when placing the headphone on your head they simply wrap around your ears like an air pillow or sponge. Which brings me to one concern I was unable to test, there is a possibility in summer these overly thick pads may cause sweat and heat build up, being Winter in Australia I was unable to test for this issue. Though again when you wear HM9 it just feels really fun, cool and I just love the headphone for this aspect, the appeal to mainstream / fashion buyers is very high in this regard.

I think another thing that counts here is we've made quite clear HM9 is a very comfortable headphone and this all comes into play for the long term, I could wear it for many hours without any problems, I might need to just release the cups or readjust them on my ears occasionally though long term wearing was quite righteous. There's just something about this headphone that makes you keep reaching to wear them over and over again.

Due to the thick pads isolation is above average, I've no problems blocking out enough ambient noise around me whether in the house or walking down the road while traffic passes, of course you can still hear what's going on around you, though you may need to remove the headphone to have a conversation. All in all isolation is more than satisfactory. Almost every base is covered with HM9's design for on the go or home use.


Sound Quality:

After running several sources with HM9 I came to the conclusion it paired rather well with both my iPod touch 4G and iPod Video.

For the most of this sound impression will be based on an iPod Touch 4G running 256 AAC files (set flat no EQ)

Specs;

Drivers : Dynamic 40mm

Rated Impedance: 40ohms

Frequency Range: 10Hz - 24Khz

Sensitivity : 104 db @ 1 mW

Max input Power: 1000 mW

Distortion: <=0.3% @ 94 db

Channel balance: =< 2db (@ 1000Hz) 



 
 
 

Bass:


Being focused towards mainstream crowds (well I assume so) HM9's low end is indeed quite forward, there's a good chunk of sub-bass and mid-bass accompanying the presentation at most times, those who like their sub-bass rumble and well textured low ends will be pleased, I would lean to say while HM9's bass doesn't reach 'extreme' bass-head it certainly would classify as a bass-head headphone for my standards. the good side is while the bass is fairly prominent it does have good clarity and detail. The downside to this however is bass bleed can be a little obvious into the mid-range depending on volume levels, also  the headphone is dependent on your genres used. I think anyone looking to play acoustic music with HM9 it's simply not the right headphone for the job, however those who like their rap music, EDM and dub-step look no further at the bass emphasis.

As I've said I don't know for sure where Brainwavz were going with HM9 though it appears a good competitor for anyone looking at a beats alternative, so with that in mind the bassy signature will please mainstream consumers that come with it.  If I was going to call the low end out and spot a fault for my preferences there's a little too much mid-bass at times, with the thick deep pads of HM9 it can get a little boomy though again overall the low end is quite pleasing especially for those who enjoy some bass thump!


Mids:

Moving onto the mids HM9 is basically tuned to down to be warm, smooth and forgiving, whilst it isn't the most detailed headphone I've heard at $150 it certainly does a good job of being non fatiguing in it's mid-range, a real plus side for those who like listening for hours, overall the mid-range may sound veiled to some on first listen though a 10 minute adjustment period will allow you to hear what it's trying to achieve and  absorb the ambiance and atmosphere this headphone is about at heart. A smooth, warm and to some extent relaxing presentation (minus the bass). Detail levels between the lower and upper-mids are rather balanced so you get a grasp at all mid frequency ranges, remembering the bass we spoke about is always there quite obviously forward over the mid-range most of the time but this also adds to the atmosphere and presentation.

If I was going to be picky I think not as much warmth would better for my preferences, I can understand why the headphone is tuned down to protect against fatigue and long term listening though lifting the veil just a fraction would make the headphone much clearer / cleaner allowing some of that restricted detail to come through. I think for a headphone focused towards a certain crowd it's fine, but be a little daring Brainwavz, lift the veil and show some more clarity allowing those 40mm drivers to show what they can really do.

When we talk about timbre and clarity HM9 is quite natural, but very cosy sounding, I quite enjoy the headphones while laying down with ambient tracks and giving my preference of analytical and bright balanced armatures based IEM's a rest. I can totally grasp where the headphone is coming from being warm and cosy around the mid-range.


Highs:

As you could probably guess the highs are tuned down to be relaxed, they're a little behind the bass and mid-range in a safe manner though always present enough to give the presentation full appeal. Extension is about average but the detail and clarity is quite obvious so it gives the high end a sufficient amount of sparkle and air upstairs. For those looking at sticking to the 'safe side' treble is right on the money though not too absent to cause an issue for those who like their treble. When tuning a headphone I imagine the hardest part is getting the treble correct as it's quite a sensitive area with a mass of varying tolerance levels. What HM9's highs do is hit a sweet spot of safety and presence (not an easy task)

For me, who does admit being a little treble head I could use some more up stairs, increase the amount of air around the stage.


Soundstage / imaging:

Due to the deep pads there's a sufficient amount of soundstage width present, it's not going to sound overly out of the head though you get a good grasp of the left / right / center channels working in conjunction with one another, the width for a headphone of this design is more than adequate, keep in mind  I also push in saying soundstage width is often more so dependent on your source than the headphone, they must work together. For a closed design the stage does quite well especially in regards to depth on the center channel. Of course more width is usually the better scenario in most cases but sure, HM9 pleases without being over the top or too extreme.

Not closed in not miles apart, a satisfactory amount of staging.


Conclusion:

With the likes of HM9 as a complete package I think Brainwavz hit the nail on the head in regards to comfort, design, outdoor appeal, I can tell you I would happily wear this headphone over any beats or celebrity consumer headphone in an instant, there's something about HM9 that just screams a "super appealing" piece of gear to me. as I've said in the flesh it almost has an Alien like styling which just sits with me so well. When you add the comfort levels on top it just becomes an awesome deal for anyone looking to be different in the outside world. The build is top notch at the cost of a little weight, but those soft soft pads on the cups and headband make up for it over and over again. I always reach for it just to enjoy them for this aspect.

As for the sound, I can understand where Brainwavz were going though to please a wider audience lifting some of the veil on their next product would be a welcome improvement for me. In a world of Head-fi and portable audio many of us are searching for detail, clarity and a vivid presentation, even if it means at the cost of early fatigue, I think they could have met that requirement half way by just lifting that mid-range a touch and lessening the mid-bass. Let's show the mainstream crowd a different signature and be daring, but in saying that I can totally understand where HM9 goes with it's smooth warm tone overall.

Once again, thanks to Brainwavz and Audrey for the sample, I absolutely love the headphone, it's my daily portable for months to come.



 

~H20

Brainwavz are at it again with their new 10mm dynamic driver based IEM named "S5".  I must say I was intrigued to try the new sample and where they'd come from Brainwavs B2 I owned many months ago (and loved). S5 takes on an a new elegant design, rather modern appearance and although a little larger than we've seen still fits the bill nicely with its stealth looking housings. But how does it sound? Well, let's take a look as I think it sounds pretty good.

Let me start off by saying I'd like to thank Brainwavs for the sample it's been a wonderful experience.




 
 
 


Specs:
 

Drivers	Dynamic, 10mm
Shell	All metal
Rated Impedance	16 ohms
Frequency Range	18 Hz – 24 kHz
Sensitivity	110 dB @ 1mW
Cable	1.3m, flat copper cable
Plug	3.5 mm gold plated, straight
Weight	21g (with comply T400s fitted)
Fitting	Over ear

Design / Build:

Brainwavs S5 housings are made completely from lightweight metal which is not seen so much for an IEM of this price range, the end results something feeling almost bullet proof in the hand and make a nice "clink" when touching them together. Like others I assumed S5 was made of plastic because it's just the norm with most IEM's in this price category, so I was quite surprised. Although cold to the touch (especially here in Winter Australia), you cannot help feel secure your purchase is going to last and at $99 that's hard to come by.

Taking a look at the strain reliefs and Y spilt you feel just as confident with their reinforced rubber and slightly overly thick approach. I don't think they'll be broken in a hurry and will stand up against throwing the earphones in your pocket, however I do suggest you use the provided carry case!

Although S5 has been designed for over the ear wearing I think it's quite important to state these can be worn down without much problem, you wouldn't think so with the housing angle, but it's quite easy to do and doesn't look goofy, well, not in my opinion. The fit was also no problem obtaining a seal. Another reason I don't like wearing S5 over the ear takes us to the cable design, I simply don't think the flat cable sits well over my ear, so for that reason I opted to wear S5 down.

Hey...no problem!




 



Even down below you can see the overly strengthened Y Spilt and 3.5mm jack giving a feeling of confidence. but it's not all bells and whistles as we move onto the cable. If there's one thing that annoys me about S5 it's the flat cable, well not so much the 'flatness' but more so the weight and flexibility. While I can agree with the beats and "non tangle" approach the cables also adopted quite a hefty weight and thickness which in turn causes some microphonics and memory, the cable can tend to spring around a little on the go. It's not a deal breaker here though when stripping the earphone down you might just want to take a close look.




 


 


Accessories: 
 
As usual the package contains quite an abundance of tips to choose from (including a set of comply), the stock carry case I've seen before on Brainwavs R3 and a 6.3 to 3.5 mm adapter for those who want to use their S5 from a home amplifier. I never tried the comply tips as they simply won't fit my large canals though the "grey stock" tips fit me perfectly.

Tips supplied.

 x3 sets of grey single flange (small bore)
 x3 silicone single flange with (wider bore)
 x1 set of black (dual flange)
 x1  set of triple flange silicones.
 x1 set of comply foam. (T400)

(Please excuse my photo here I cannot find all the tips since a big cleanup, I have borrowed a picture from another review)




 




Sound: 


 
 



Bass:

The low end on S5 is certainly a fraction forward form neutral, although mixed opinions I don't find the bass overbearing or too upfront, while there's some mid-bass emphasis it's not going to be on a bass-head level in either sub-bass or mid-bass but more so a safe amount that tends to balance out well with the mids and highs. You do get a get good sense of mid-bass on EDM and trance tracks which helps fill out the lower mids giving some atmosphere, I wouldn't want any less. There's average speed but with a slight decay that can hang around just a little too long for acoustic tracks. I find the earphones low end in general geared towards all genres though possibly going to excel with EDM. Detail is sufficient as is texture and depth.


Mids:

Here at the heart of S5 you get a decently detailed mid-range with a natural timbre, if not a little metallic sounding but certainly unique.  There is good push in the upper-mid which bring out vocal detail and acoustic guitars well for the price range and one of the more detailed earphones I've heard for $99. I think of course there's limitations but the mids of S5 do show you we're moving forward in technology and driver design. I personally prefer the mid-range of S5 over RE-400 as it has that push in the upper mids and sounds a fraction cooler in tonality, also the bass just matched better with S5's mid-range in comparison. Though keep in mind personal preference is always in the eye of the beholder. Micro detail is at a decent level and in some ways reminds me of that found on some balanced armatures. In short the S5 mid-range does have a balanced armature presence. If I didn't know better I would assume it was one from the clarity levels. (S5 could easily pull this off)


Treble:

On first listen the treble did come across to me as a little harsh, it's well detailed but gains some of that metallic sheen I mentioned above. Personally for me I wouldn't want anymore forwardness in the lower treble, it treads a fine line between enough and 'too much". Despite this never goes all the way out of line and bothers me. I just find it to sound a little strange with some tracks or one toned in that it doesn't really change much with the music taking on a specific shimmer that basically stays the same a lot of the time. Extension is decent and the upper treble has good sparkle, there's just something going on in the lower treble that gives that sense of forwardness. Overal its more than pleasing and neither hides or protrudes on the presentation. 


Soundstage:

For an IEM of this price S5 soundstage is decent but nothing that's going to take any fame from an EX600 anytime soon. There's good stereo separation which helps divide the channels and you'll hear the occasional sample lingering outside your ears. Air is decent which most likely is a relative to the slightly forward treble. While S5 is never compressed or congested anywhere in the frequency range it's not going to be the most open sounding earphone. Keep in mind my opinion much of soundstage width from an IEM is dependent on your source, so this will vary depending on your MP3 players technical aspects.  As I'm listening now from Sansa Clip Zip I've heard a lot less width and I've heard more in other earphones so you be the judge.


Seperation / imaging:

For the price very decent here, each instruments well separated you get a good sense of instruments ticking in time with each other. there's very little if any smearing to talk about. If you throw fast paced EDM at the S5 it may begin to confuse a little due to the mid-bass pushing through though for most parts the entire earphone stays fairly clean and coherent. For the price range I couldn't ask for more in this area, mighty fine clean job.


Conclusion:

In my opinion S5 is a better contender than RE-400 for what its worth, while I thought RE-400 was decent it didn't give me the same wow effect as S5 or enjoyment. Possibly partly due to S5's slightly prominent bass and that push in the upper mid-range bringing out more detail with vocals and guitars. Overall, I find S5 to have better tone. If you put both in-front of me for a fun listening experience I would take the S5 as I simply find it more involving and an enjoyable listen. I don't see S5 having any problem sitting next to earphones like the $200 Dunu DN-1000 or being an alternative for those who want to save some money, because you're not missing terrible amounts here. I think what Brainwavz have done is stay moderately safe while showing people what a dynamic driver in 2014 can offer for just $99. Could I use S5 every day and be happy? Yes, yes I could, and that's what makes an IEM for me worth using, when it can offer up an above normal listening experience without making me feel underwhelmed.


​
 
 


Again, I'd like to thank Brainwavs for the sample.


​~H20 

I must admit It's been quite a journey with the company T-PEOS since I tried their H-100 going way back to October - 2012. Since then I've heard most of T-PEOS mid tier line up including H-200 hybrid released around March - 2013 which grabbed quite the attention on Head-Fi and probably for good reason as it scored notably high in some reviews other than mine. I still rate H-200 one of the better hybrids for the price range, under $300. The features including detachable cables with consumer friendly price was most welcomed from T-PEOS.

Moving onto March - 2014, we meet again with T-PEOS brand new H-300 hybrid, lets see if T-PEOS set the bench even higher with their new 3 way hybrid, I think they have indeed but with a different flavor and although the unit isn't perfect it's very close. I must report the unit I have wasn't a review sample, I paid pre sale price of $250 USD + $20 USD shipping. There is one other H-300 unit coming to Australia for a Head-fi members tour so be sure to keep your eyes peeled for those impressions and reviews arriving soon.

The tour link with impressions / reviews can be found here: http://www.head-fi.org/t/708754/tour-t-peos-h-300-3-way-hybrid-australian-tour-thread-impressions-reviews

T-PEOS Website: http://www.t-peos.co.kr/

Price currently on Pre-Sale: $250 USD + $20 USD EMS shipping

Presale link: http://www.head-fi.org/t/704283/t-peos-announce-a-releasing-of-h-300-and-start-pre-selling-compensation-sale


T-PEOS H-300 - 3 Way Hybrid:

H-300 is a 3 way hybrid design which consists of dual balanced armatures for the mids and highs and a separate dynamic driver to handle the lows. Up until a few years ago hybrids were far and few between however most recently we're really seeing them come into the spot light, with the likes of AKG, Dunu, Tralucent, Rhapsodio, Aurisonics, Sony, just to name a few bringing out some inspiring hybrid designs.





Specs and Features:
 
- Aluminum and stainless steel sus303 body 
- Covered flaw of H-200 and strengthened bass more
- Attached detachable cable with 2.5mm DC jack connector
   ( compatible with H-200 )
 
Specification:
 
-Driver Units : Double Balanced Armature & Dynamic Driver
- Impedance : 22 Ohm / 1 kHz
- Sensitivity : 105 dB / 1 kHz
- Power : 100 mW (Max.)
- Frequency Response : 20 Hz ~ 20 kHz
- Connectors & Plugs : 2.5mm DC Jack Connector and 
    3.5mm / 24k Gold Plated L-Type Plug 
- Cable : Non-PVC Detachable Cable with Microphone & Non- PVC Detachable Cable with 3 Pole Plug
- Weight : 16g
 
Accessories : 
 
- Carry Pouch
- Foam Tips & Ear Tips
- Extra Cable with 3 Pole Plug 
- 6.5mm Audio Adapter
 

Please note:

Because there's going to be a head-fi members tour for H-300 which will take about 3 months to complete with a full 10 members participating this review will be shorter then ones usually found by myself as I believe I am only person with one opinion. As I said in my H-200 review the full decision of H-300 becoming a worthy competitor lies in the hands of members. I believe H-300 has what it takes to become popular personally just like H-200 did before it.



 

Packaging:


T-PEOS have been known to outfit their packaging and H-300 is no exception, although we're no longer greeted with the popular wooden storage box once found in the original H-100, instead a consumer friendly approach similar to  H-200's packaging last year. It seems many companies have adopted an open box experience similar to Beats Tour or the Monster line up, I found similar in Dunu DN-1000 hybrid packaging. As you can see in the photo, theirs little inserts for the IEM and a foam lined inner carton.



Here's a series of photos showing an unboxing:





















Accessories:

Now we've finally reached the bottom of the box lets see what's inside. Firstly, you're greeted with a much larger carry case than previously found on H-200, does anyone remember the rather under sized storage case that came with H-200? Well I do, it was something many people mentioned being to small for even storing H-200 inside. T-PEOS have listened  bringing us a considerably bigger carry case with a zipper feature which easily stores not only H-300 but all the accessories to boot. Inside there isn't a second sleeve or pocket for placing tips in although the extra dimensions this time round more than welcome. Great to see!

There's an assortment of tips including those popular red foam tips seen with H-200 accessories and silicon tips of various sizes (S/M/L). There's also a rather large shirt clip that works well along with one  6.3mm adapter for those who like using their H-300 in a home environment or with  home amplifiers.







Moving forward to the earphones themselves you have two cables, one mic cable / one non mic. I'm rather intrigued by the spectrum color coding on the non mic cable, still lets get back to the mic cable for a minute. I haven't been able to test the controls, however there is only one button and a mic present, I have no idea if this works with both Apple and Andriod. Moving on If you have a close look at the connectors this time round, T-PEOS have changed the design from square plugs previously found on H-200 cables to round. I have no strategy what the reason for this was though it seems to operate just as well.


The detachable cables and housings are backwards compatible with any H-200 cable/housing, a slight push followed by a light click can be heard when pushing the connector in. I will say when removing the cable please be careful, do so in two part process. Hold the housing carefully in one hand then pull the plug delicately with a little twist, it should come out about 3mm, after that's done moderately pull the cable away from the housing. Never clean jerk the plug continuously from the housing, slowly and discreetly is your friend. Each cable is terminated with a right angle jack basically identical to that found on H-200. Microphonics are present slightly on both cable and they can be worn over the ear without a problem.









 


Build / Fit: 

H-300 housings are constructed entirely from aluminum and stainless steel, each housing weighs a miniature 4.5grams, (with cable attached) which is terribly light for a hybrid design, they weigh much less compared to Dunu DN-1000 at  7.5grams, you really feel the difference when wearing them too.

How T-PEOS managed to keep the net weight down I don't know except they sure have made one of the lightest hybrids I've held in my hand which is almost entirely un- felt after a short period wearing them. You can also see they have lost the ring fit guide previously present on H-200. At first glance you would presume the housing are rather lengthy which is correct they're indeed longer than H-200 by a few millimeters however they do something very handy for your user experience when wearing them which I will explain. Each nozzle is the standard size so after market tips fit no problem.

I think the housings have quite an executive appearance to them, quite the business man approach. Sleek and user friendly for a majority.




 



When wearing the housings they angle  backwards towards the outer edge of your ear, if you see this diagram the rear of the housing locks into the section of my ear highlighted, if you feel with your finger there's almost a little cavity there, this stops H-300 moving around keeping it considerably secure for me. I really like the way the housing seats into the ear staying put. I have no problems walking, or jumping. T-Peos
seem to have used the human anatomy for H-300 fitting implementation. It works quite well and hopefully for you too.

(For those wondering, no that is not me in the photo)






Isolation and insertion depth:

H-300 don't require a deep insertion, it's rather shallow to medium, isolation is only average but far sufficient to cut out most outside noise. You won't be producing anywhere near Etymotics isolation levels though more than adequate for outside use. I actually find H-300 very comfortable, tips fit snugly, the way that housing locks in really amounts to them feeling secure. It's high fives all round for the design, build, and present usability of H-300. I have encountered no driver flex with this pair, none.



Sound Quality: 


Tonality:

H-300 takes a different transformation to the earlier H-200, the tonality being a fraction bright cool and very clean, there's absolutely no veil what so ever, it sounds rather lean compared to something like TF10 or H-200, and edges closer towards the tonality found on my Rhapsodio RDB Mini hybrid. This is good thing for most listeners as the clarity just melts on through with ease, H-300 really is very clean, highly transparent hybrid, if you've ever heard a DBA-02 and can imagine a dynamic driver supporting the low end you have close to what H-300's tonality sounds like. Those who prefer warmth may need a slight adjustment period, though I can assure you it's well worth the time.

 
Bass: 

To be quite frank the dynamic driver used on H-300 is some of the best bass I've heard period, on any hybrid or IEM even some passing the $600 mark. it leans more towards the neutral side of things but has wonderful speed, texture and clarity, you can effortlessly hear each bass note well defined and separated from the spotless mid. there's very little if any mid bass bloat and no bleed, just tight, spotless clean low end detail. The bass on H-300 was one of the first things to jump out at me, like I'd been missing something in my music all this time. it really has taken my expectations to a new level. The way you can hear each bass note executing bouncing onto the next and the actual shaping of each note is by far close to the best I've heard besides possibly Tralucents revised 1Plus2, and that's big call considering some of the gear I've heard. 


Mids:

H-300's mid range is airy, clean, transparent and as we've spoken about a touch bright with very generous detail extraction levels far above that of H-200 and leaving IEM like the Dunu DN-1000 behind sounding remarkably pure and coherent, I hate to say it but H-300 does start edging into detail levels my $650 hybrid can reach. The mids are a fraction recessed, I can hear vocals sitting a little further back however it sits in well with the signature. Because of the transparency and refinement the ability to hear samples on the left/center/right channels during busy passages is almost effortless and slow passages the hybrid doesn't even need to think about it.

For example when you listen to an acoustic track you will often hear guitars playing in the background or off to the back left, often with many IEM's you can hear these somewhat but not imaging very clearly, meaning they tend to get lost in the background or smear, what H-300 does is make every sample come into the spotlight, you can pick out instruments at ease following their riffs. it's mainly due to the high level of transparency. Clarity levels are right up there and surpass H-200 and Dunu DN-1000 quite easily, as is the micro detailing, you can pick out little nooks and crannies on songs many other IEM in the price range smear or don't uncover. I have however found a little bit of vocal sibilance if you push them really hard though the way this hybrid is tuned to be lean, you really get a good listening session at lower volumes, you don't need to crank them up to enjoy them. 

If I had to sum up the mid-range in a few key words they would be: Transparency, Detail, Clarity, Airy, Cool (fraction bright)


Treble:

As we move up to the highs, they're well detailed with good extension, and contribute to the airy mid range, it's not what I'd call hot treble though certainly a little hotter than H-200 or the DN-1000, for my preferences, the high end is just about right for me, it can sometimes get a little hot on some tracks though it never pushes that boundary where it treads to far out and spikes you. I do think some people may find it a little peaky in sections, it could be a touch smoother however considering the rest of the presentation it sits in well. I want to get some more members impressions on the treble and we'll get some answers from the tour members, but I cannot detect any glaring faults.


Separation:

Excellent separation. As we've spoken about the mids transparency. When working in conjunction with the instrument separation that's partly why we're hearing samples so clearly, the separation on a technical level is again approaching levels my Rhapsodio RDB Mini can achieve and really isn't a force to be reckoned with, one of H-300 real strong points. It makes many other IEM I have heard in this price range sound like a toy. (yes Westone I'm looking at you) I think it's a sure sign T-PEOS have spared nothing for H-300 on a technical level.


Soundstage:

Again, H-300's soundstage reaches widths that are close to excelling Dunu DN-1000 Hybird and already bettering my RDB Mini, it has good depth and height to boot but the best thing about this is H-300 has a rather magical trick up it's sleeve coming across as very 3D, something DN-1000 has a certain aspect of but not to this extend. When a song often busts into the chorus and many instruments start playing the stereo imaging bursts outwards from the left/right channels, almost like they form a kind of hologram around the stage, when you add this with the transparency, clarity and slightly bright tonality it can be almost instant eargasm with the right tracks., it's rather impressive to hear and I really hope others find the same thing.


Conclusion:

What you have here in H-300 is a rather cool sounding hybrid with high transparency levels a wonderful soundstage and far above detail levels it's price suggests,  then to boot a very capable dynamic driver downstairs. Now it's not perfect, it can exhibit some vocal sibilance if you push them hard though not terrible needs a mention, and please note the mid range is a touch recessed however I think what this hybrid does right is really a no brainier for people looking to purchase.

For me to say H-300 has technical levels on similar standards to my $650 hybrid is a big call but something I really think H-300 pulls off. The soundstage and transparency is genuinely quite magical to listen to, and I highly recommend giving H-300 a try. As I say in my reviews I'm only one person and the members will judge H-300 in it's entirety, though for me, It's an instant keeper and will be staying in my collection for some time. It has already brought me many fun listening sessions and will do so for many more to come.

I'd like to thank T-PEOS for putting the tuning effort in with this one, it really has paid off.


~H20
 
 

Firstly, I'd like to say special thanks to James from FiiO and Joe for offering us a wonderful tour on their new FiiO X5 unit.

It's not everyday we get to sample a new product before release, this has been a wonderful opportunity not only to give members a grasp on the player though also examine whether the unit might be for myself as a keeper or future purchase. I will try to write as even review as possible. The FiiO X5 unit I have with me is a loaner unit for 10 days to assess my likes and dislikes. I received the X5 unit on the 25th of February 2014. Firmware version: FW1.10

My past history with FiiO being I haven't been particular fond of their warmer house sound. In general I lean for more neutral sound signatures and as preference prefer bright to analytical presentations, (though I am flexible to a degree). What I've always been impressed with about FiiO is their excellent price to performance ratio for budget orientated audio enthusiasts which seems almost untouched by any other company out there. When I heard FiiO was designing a higher end DAP that leans more towards neutral from their previous house sound this intrigued me quite a lot, especially remembering the price to performance ratio I mentioned.





 



Packaging:
 
The FiiO X5 unit comes in a stand alone box with an outer sleeve, it reminds me very much of IBasso's DX50's packaging, simple, sweet and elegant, nothing to over the top though enough to get the job done nicely with a feeling of satisfaction. After all its what inside that counts right? To some yes, but FiiO have dressed up the boxing nicely to give that consumer feel. The inner box can also be used for long term (or short term storage) of your unit as you can see in the photos, the X5 sits nicely inside and you can place the lid back on.












 
 
 

Inside the packaging you're greeted with:

 

1.  Pre molded Silicon case (high quality silicon)
2.  High current USB charging / data cable (shielded)
3.  Digital out to coax cable
4.  3 x socket pin protector plugs (for the output ports)
5.  FiiO branded USB micro SD card reader 
6. x2 spare screen protectors for the X5 (plus one already fitted)

 

1.  FiiO warranty card
2.  HD tracks discount card (15%)
3. Contact card
4. FiiO X5 quick start guide
   
   
   
   
    

 
 
 
 
As you can see the accessories are more than adequate FiiO seem to have provided everything you need to get started, there won't be any 'I need this" or "damn I forgot to get that". The only thing you will need is your own micro sd card as FiiO X5 does not support any internal storage for music, it relies on dual  micro sd cards slots.  I hear X5 can be bought bundled together with micro sd card to get you on your way although I think in our day and age especially amongst many of us here micro sd cards are found in most users house holds. If not they're rather cheap and only dropping in price due to the the new Sandisk 128GB cards now on the market. 




Build quality:

The finish is of high quality aluminum alloy which feels solid in the hand making the x5 unit feel a little more than it's asking price, on the sides the edges are smooth and well rounded over, the entire unit feels admirable in the hand, you get a real feeling of quality when holding X5 as it also holds little weight equaling 174 grams.

The scroll wheel does feel a little loose or plastic feel to it though once you learn how to use it adjusting to the sensitivity levels being more than suitable. At first I was having problems with the scroll wheel either pushing it to much or not enough which caused me to miss my destination, but as driving a car the unit becomes easier to control with some use especially after an hour or two, I also hear this will be improved in future firmware updates. I do have some concerns about it's long term durability after many months of hardcore spinning although considering the player is so early and fresh we cannot say for certain.

The input jacks feel sturdy and have a nice firm click to them as do the volume and power tactile buttons, there's a feeling of craftsmanship within the build of X5. Moving to the bottom of the player you're greeted with not one but two micro sd card slots, an excellent selling feature of X5. Each slot can take up to 128GB micro sd cards giving a whopping total storage of 256GB. I will probably opt for two 64GB cards until the price of these newer 128GB come down a touch. 















Format Support:

X5 takes almost every format you will ever need to use, rather than go through them all individually I'll simply display the formats. We also need to remember that FiiO X5 is not only a 16bit player it also does Hires 24 bit play back, this is another superior selling feature only seen in a few other players at this price point. This here having the 24bit support is a huge feature as now time is moving forward these files will be in demand so this feature assures FiiO's X5 long life span in the market.



Formats / Resolution  
 

Supported Formats	APE, WAV, FLAC, WMA, ALAC, MP2, MP3, AAC, OGG
Supported Resolution	Up to 192K/24bit – dependent on format

 


USB External sound card (using X5 as a DAC)

I must admit during my time with X5 I haven't had a chance to use it as a DAC, though the player does support this feature. To my understanding it can be connected to any laptop or PC then use the DAC section similar to FiiO E10, E17, for example. Only X5 does support 24bit playback as well in this area. For more information regarding using X5 as a DAC please check some other reviews as I'm sure it's just as functional as being a stand alone media player, it's just I don't listen to music while at a computer it's not something I can concentrate on.




 
UI (User Interface):



When first booing up the player you're greeted by the FiiO logo welcoming you to X5, the actual start up time between pressing the power button is about 6 seconds total from screen on to  main menu, I think that's a pretty decent amount of time to get up and running for my standards, especially considering the dual card support. Some players like Studio V or Rocco BA take more than 10 seconds to load and up to 15-20 seconds with Studio V as those players scan their cards before each boot up quickly. So for me the boot up times on X5 is closer to instant.. I think only a Rockboxed Clip+ would boot quicker. 

Once at the main menu you're created by a scrolling design where all your options for music selection, setting, music settings are located, it's a rather intuitive interface and something I've not seen before. You get a feeling of uniqueness but most importantly it matters how well this functions at speed. Happily I can say after a week with the unit you become quite at home rather quickly.

At first there's always that "what the hell am I doing" but without even reading the manual the player has become second nature to me in a matter of days, my only grunt is the scroll wheel sometimes misses your selection as it seems to click as you turn and sometimes doesn't land on the menu option/track selection you want, however I think in further firmware the unit will be improved in this area. By all means it's more than functional, you can move at speed though  I can see some people possibly kicking up a fuss about it.

In the system settings you can manually scan your card which can also be done automatically. I prefer having the auto scan function off as I don't think it's needed to scan every boot up unless when adding several albums to your cards. There is a key lock setting which gives you two options: option 1 disables the buttons on the DAP so you can't switch tracks or adjust the volume while the screen is off. Option 2 leaves access to the volume pause/play, track navigation buttons.

You can set the screen time out duration before the screen locks but currently you cannot disable the key-lock feature completely. As it is on the current firmware I found this a little frustrating when the player is just sitting on a table or bed because each time you pick the player up you must press the power button to unlock the unit first. I hear this will  be improved in future firmware updates. There''s also sleep mode, idle power off settings available.

You can view your music via folder view, album, artist, favorites (add favorites to your list first), genre & all music.  For me personally I only ever view my music by folder so I didn't run the player through tests of tag reading, I hear though on our boards it's fairly stable for most parts.

There is one little niggle with the current firmware, when selecting from folder view (when selecting your track) X5 unit takes about 3-4 seconds before your track starts which can be a little laggy, it does give you a feeling of halting for a second however we must remember the firmware I was on is still very early, I gather this time delay will be sped up in the future. Once an album is playing the transition between tracks is smooth. I did however detect a slight skip if gap-less was engaged between track transitions.


More examples of FiiO X5 User Interface.

(please click each photo to see close ups)


Main Menu:




System Settings:




Play Settings:



Custom 10 band EQ: (with presets):



Folder selection screen (albums):



Now Playing Screen:


 
 
 

 
Sound Quality:



Tonality:

Tonality of X5 is indeed more towards neutral than FiiO's previous products I've tried, I still personally hear a hint of warmth in the presentation, which makes the entire mid range rather smooth and non fatiguing, while I find it does lean very close on neutral I can still feel a hint in there, just a slight essence of FiiO still, but we must remember my preference with other DAP's is a little bright to begin with and everyone opinion on neutral varies wildly on head-fi and in general. When I first heard X5 I couldn't help feel it sounded a little veiled with some of my parings though that sensation clears up rather quickly, probably within 5 minutes of listening. I think most will agree the X5 unit is much closer to neutral than their previous products and this is a good thing for audiophiles.

Bass:

The bass on X5 is a tricky section for me, I find it rather powerful and a touch forward from the mid range, not by incredible amounts though it does lean a little on the emphasized side of things depending what headphone you're using. Some have suggested because of X5's driving power it's really just a tight well presented bass, but I do get a slight feeling of light bloat depending on my earphone / headphone used. For my preferences it can just hinder a little to much in the bottom stage and express a fraction of bleed, With that aside it has good texture and detail, the mid bass isn't to much for my standards (very slight amount). I think just a little less in the low end quantity would be my perfect preference although in a world that needs to please a majority of listeners I think FiiO made the right choice. 

Mids:

The mids on X5 to put in perspective are excellent, the refinement in that mid range is second to none from most DAP's I've heard  there's great coherency on both left/right channels and samples hold excellent posture all round the stage This refinement mixes in with high resolution on X5, so when they blend together they make a rather wonderful mid range experience, as I've said sometimes it feels a little to smooth or a touch lacking some aggression though the detailing levels combined with that excellent refinement really steal the show.

I think X5  (for my standards) would be better paired with a slightly brighter sounding IEM/Headphone, just a fraction to light up the mid range with some more edge and sparkle. The background on X5 is very dark, it forms a pitch black space around your instruments, with no hiss. The actual imaging is especially focused and accurate, your perception of each image well refined. 

I must double express though the mid range is simply wonderful for the price, the timbre is natural if not a fraction digital sounding. Detailing levels and clarity are right up there it makes a really professional sounding player. The micro detail is strong, I was hearing certain samples such a singers lips closing together, or a singer breathing in before the next verse my other DAP's don't express. The dark background just lets them push out from no-where. I think because of X5's high level of resolution there's new layers to find in your music, little pieces otherwise hidden and that resolution finds pushing out to you. 

Treble:

The treble to my ears has a slight emphasis in the lower regions, tends to push out most detail in this area, I cannot say it has incredible extension with pairings I've tried although never absent or lacking in anyway, rather well balanced with the mid range, you can always hear what's going on upstairs, I would however personally prefer a slight tilt here to try and increase the amount of air around the stage, this would also tilt the players overall tonality, though it doesn't seem to be lacking in anyway. Never harsh or strident, basically true to your headphone, probably a nice safe choice to again please a wide variety of consumers.

Separation:

Many people have asked me if X5's instrument separation can compete with Hisound Studio V 3rd Anv (the best instrument separation I have heard), well to be quite frank no, X5 does not match Studio V 3rd Anv's instrument separation, it is on similar levels but always lacking a touch behind in attack, it does however have better ability to present samples coherently in the mid range, there are samples I've been able to make out easier due to this bonus especially when many are playing at once though the Studio V player has like a metronome effect where instruments are so well separated they can tick in time with each other, kind of like a clock and all it's cogs working together (like clockwork). X5 does not have that unfortunately but as compensation no other player has that I've heard expect for Hisounds unit. So fear not because X5's instrument separation is far from lacking you really get a nice image of each instrument and the much darker background than Hisound players ices the cake.


Soundstage: 

X5's soundstage has excellent depth to all left/right/center channels for example, if you hear a saxophone playing on the left channel it images itself way out back much closer to what a real life presentation would sound like if it's in the recording, it does this on all 3 channels so when you add this with strong imaging characteristics  it makes a really well defined stage, the width with some of my hybrids is wider than most players I've heard, but it also has a big head-stage (the actual size of the image) so vocals sound larger than average, there's a fair amount of height and all your samples sound much bigger than for example on a Sansa Clip or even the Studio V for that matter to some extent. This is an area that works well while the mid range places those final pieces to the presentation we've talked about. I have not one bad word to say about the stage, besides a little more air would work well in the upper regions. You really get that feeling you're almost there live because of this area working strongly with the right headphone..




Conclusion:


I think what FiiO have done is a mighty achievement, they have answered the prayers of consumers bringing them basically what they asked for. As we know James is very active on Head-fi forums and listens to every piece of advice, what you see in X5 is partly exactly what you all asked for, an affordable mid tier high resolution DAP. The features like dual micro sd card slots, 24bit playback, along with the sound and build of X5 is what could possibly be a slight game changer for the future. I think some other DAP manufacturers may want to take a step back and look what FiiO are doing in the DAP market. I still think for me X5 needs to lean cooler in tonality, just a fraction and lessen the bass because of my stubborn preferences but overall taking into consideration the majority, X5 was made for them, and for them it will more than please.

I had a lot of fun on this tour and would like to thank once again the FiiO team.


~H20​

Recently on Head-fi forums I was approached by another member to contribute in a competition RHA Team were holding to review their new MA750 dynamic based IEM.  I knew very little about the company from Glasgow UK or any of their offerings in the past, I didn't even know how much MA750 was worth on receiving them which I think we can look at in a positive way, going in fresh!  I'd like to thank RHA Team for the review sample as it's been a pleasant surprise indeed. Please make note the version I have is MA750 which does not come with the mic/controls.
 
RHA-MA750







• 303F grade stainless steel housings
• Handmade 560.1 dynamic driver
• Precise, balanced and articulate sound
• Reinforced, 1.35m, oxygen-free copper cable
• Signature aerophonic™ design
• Premium carry case & tip selection
• Three year warranty
• MSRP: $119.95
• Available 28th August - USA
• Available now - UK & Europe


Packaging and Accessories: 

RHA spared nothing on the packaging of this earphone offering a first class experience, I can say that having purchased IEM's in the $300-$400 bracket. You'll be greeted with a wonderful box containing enough information to fill an encyclopedia, enough for you to sit there absorbing your fresh purchase for hours, mentally preparing for that big moment. Features, like the hand made 560.1 dynamic driver, stainless steel housing construction, and lets not forget that wonderful and lengthly 3 year warranty.  Having a warranty of such time shows RHA are confident in their product. I think that's an incredible thought on their behalf and in all honestly when scanning the construction of MA750 I really do think durability is far above what the price would suggest already, especially the strain reliefs and sturdy cable thickness.  You'll even be greeted with a frequency response chart, that admirable curve for those who like looking at them. 
 
          
 
 
Lets take a look at that great assortment of tips provided and carry case. There's enough tips to suit almost everyone I imagine, everyone except for me unfortunately who has used IEM's for so long now daily I've literally stretched my ear canals? even the largest of  silicon tips RHA provided would'nt keep seal for me. I find this rather frustrating as I'm left with limited tip choices, however I wouldn't let this concern everyday consumers. What RHA provided is more than sufficient offering a ton of options, including single flange, double flange and foam tips options. I will make note the tips are of decent silicon quality, possibly a little thin on the walls, I prefer something thicker, however light and comfortable.

There's also one stylish carry case provided which has more than enough room for your new earphones. If there's something I can't stand when a company makes a carry case assuming you're going to compress your earphones and spend 10 minutes carefully shoving them inside only to need them out again in half an hour. What RHA did is make the case to open like a book for easy and quick access. (has a real business mans approach). The case also doubles as a tip holder using some elastic inside the case.  Mighty nice design and overly functional. It's a little large to place inside a jeans pocket but shouldn't cause concern in a jacket or track suit pants.
 
              



Build Quality:

(Including the sound) MA750 becomes very hard to ignore here, that includes sensible pricing. Remembering what I said above in my introduction I knew nothing about the $119 amazon price tag of MA750, on opening the box immediately assumed I was looking at something in the $200 - $300 price bracket. The build is excellent with strong sturdy strain reliefs both on the jack and earphones, a cable thick enough for Tarzan to swing from and superiority polished stainless steel housings. I need to stress here I've shown people MA750 without telling them the price, most easily doubled their retail value. The build is without a doubt solid, durable, stylish and leaks a passion for design. What RHA have done makes you wonder what the hell some other company are thinking.

I do however (although love the look) have some concerns for the jack strain relief where a flexible spring has been used, I see two problems. The first being it actually makes the jack a lot longer then required, this may cause a concern for people using smartphones wanting to place in their pocket and secondly, if the spring flexes to much over time in one direction is it going to lose shape and stay kinked in a 'bent' direction? Time will tell, but for aesthetics plugging the jack into my home DAPs I love it, looks great. The cable is also quite thicker than your standard found on IEM's not sure why RHA went for such a thickness, but the durability will be increased by about double. You can see the cable beside a standard offering by Dunu in one of the pics below. 

 
           


Comfort / Isolation / Fit:

Remembering what I said about my large ear canals, I did have some problems acquiring a fit with MA750, there were times I need to readjust the housings to keep seal, this was only sitting still or simply moving my head, I really don't think it will be a concern for others however, I cannot say they stayed completely sealed with my alternative tip selection. When fitted correctly they're however rather comfortable, possibly the hoops could use a little more flex as they tend to try springing back into their original shape due to the thickness. When MA750 is sealed they do isolate fairly well, nothing extreme and I will rate it above average. Keep in mind tip selection is a vital part of isolation and will vary person to person. I must note there is a ever slight amount of driver flex present on both sides if I push terribly hard on insertion, lifting the ear prevents this.



Sound Quality:

Gear used:

Xuelin IHIFI 760
Colorfly C3
Hisound Rocco BA
Hisound Studio V
Sansa Clip+
Tralucent T1 amp
IPod Touch 4G.

All files were 16/44 FLAC files. (50 hours burn in was given before review)





Lows:

The low end of MA750 is indeed a touch emphasised, the sub-bass extension using my IHIFI player is some of the deepest fulfilling sub-bass impact I've heard from an IEM in this price range, it also has great texture and depth which will easily please the beats crowd, It's possibly some of the most satisfying bass I've heard from a dynamic driver with the Xuelin DAP. I tried some other sources in which it wasn't quite as prominent but still very upfront in the presentation., you'll absorb solid impact and a feeling of satisfaction. There's a slight mid-bass hump which can haunt the mids a touch at times but really it's very controlled for the price, has good speed and remains refined. When you consider MA750 price the low end punches well above that, and a preference role will be played whether it suits the individual in quantity.. For me personally it could become a little overbearing at times and extended listening, but if I wanted to bass out for an hour with some dubstep I was pleased. 

Mids:

When looking into buying MA750 you will find they sound a touch warm,, dark /thick in the mid range but never fear because detail pushes through overly well, again for the price there's a whooping amount of detail, even pushing near (or to me slightly above) the famous Vsonic GR07 MK2 detail extension. There's also a wonderful natural timbre that has great depth when listening to piano or acoustic instruments, it's kind of unheard of for the $119 price tag and that's why when hearing MA750 the first time I assumed they were worth a lot more. It's kind of bizarre what RHA have accomplished and I wonder if they didn't charge enough? Another thing you'll find in the mid range is good attack of instruments, very switched 'on' quickly pushing instruments out at you, A lot of this also comes down to the speed of their dynamic driver.

Overall the mid range is rather smooth and exhibits a nice atmosphere at lower volumes, but when listening at louder levels comes to the party with class. I must note there are a few of my recordings that showed some sibilance, there's a certain frequency which doesn't agree with MA750. The vocal sibilance I experienced with Xuelin DAP was rather harsh however, I think it may be a source problem because although still present didn't display as severe with the little Colorfly C3 or Rocco BA.


Highs:

The high end is something I think could use some improvement, if I'm going to be critical. Slightly rolled off to my ears and lacks a little extension, although safe way to approach an IEM it needs a touch more sparkle which 'can' easily be fixed with EQ. There's sufficient detailing levels but comes off a little tinny or harsh with some tracks to me, by no means a lacking or muted treble but it just needs a little more shrill, refinement and a little less 'tinky' sound, I think extension would improve the high end. What you end up with is a slightly darker sound over all due to the emphasised low end and warmer mid range while the treble rolls off a touch early.



Soundstage / Sepertation / imaging:

RHA have done it again, offering a soundstage far above what the price would suggest, it's has expansive width and a pleasing depth to it. you'll certainly hear guitars imaging from the left and right nicely picking out instruments in most directions, it can be a touch congested at times due to the mid bass creeping through however a nicely done job. Instrument separation is also some of the best I've heard in this price range, even to my ears bettering the more expensive GR07 MK2. You really get a sense or slight metronome effect listening to the instruments playing in time which each other, a real clockwork experience as every sample and instrument forms the presentation, It's not the best separation I have if we're going to talk about $650+ hybrids but better than many IEM's I've heard around the $250 price range. So a very well done job in the technicality of MA750.


Versatility:

MA750 handled all genres with style, especially EDM, acoustic, it also handled orchestra well., It's because of that natural timbre and attack speed in the mid range it really gives depth to a song and makes the MA750 incredibly adapted to most genre's. If anything it didn't do the best I've heard for my Metallica tracks, the speed was there but it lacks a little in guitar crunch, though really I am comparing to IEM's double the price such as T-Peos H-200 Hybrid.


Conclusion:

I think what RHA have provided for the price is exceptional value, it's not hard to do a quick google search and find some other reviews of this product, you'll see most of us are in total agreement that the value to price ratio is almost off the scale. I've read several reviewers mention the sound quality and build could compete with IEM's in the $200 - $250 bracket so it's not only me I've read it several times. I think next time if they could increase the detail even further and lessen the mid bass a fraction also get some further extension on the treble would be a nice thing to try, but really for this price the value and sound quality is kind of unheard of and I'd recommend this IEM without any problem to buyers looking in the $119-$200 price area. It really is one neat package that shouldn't be ignored, and you can take that opinion from seasoned reviewers like Headfonia and some of our Head-fi members.


Jolly good show RHA, jolly good show, indeed!


~H20

Shin-woo Tech who recently changed their name to T-PEOS has brought us a new product inherit of their H-100 last year. Their new Triple Hybrid called H-200 has been redesigned from the ground up, undergone extensive tuning before finally reaching the hands of selected reviewers on Headi-Fi. I was excited to hear this release was finally underway wanting to hear what changes had been made, also to see if T-Peos have indeed corrected previous issues with their earlier model, it appears they certainly have which should please a much wider audience. H-200 welcomes us with a brand new signature leaning much more towards balance and audiophile territory.



Specs:

Driver Unit : Double Balanced Armature & Dynamic Unit.
Impedance : 22 Ohm / 1kHz
Sensitivity : 105dB / 1kHz
Power : 100mW (Max)
Frequency Response :20Hz ~ 20kHz
Connector : 3.5mm / 24k Gold Plated L-type Plug
Cord : Detachable Braided 1.2M / Y-Type
Weight 15g


Introduction:

H-200 is an 3 way Hybrid design which consists of one dynamic driver for the lows, double balanced armature for mids & highs. Other models taking on this concept familiar to some would be AKG K3003, Tralucents 1plus2, not an easy design to pull off because it takes much research developing the bass / mids / highs all performing in conjunction as one. Balanced armatures move much faster than dynamic drivers so frequency response across the spectrum is difficult to line up than your regular earphone. I say still an area in portable audio many are trying to accomplish however, only a few make to popularity, so far.

Just to get this review underway I will explain I don't have any retail packaging for my H-200 demo pair, I have accessories and earphones, so this review will be shorter than those usually seen. We'll focus on sound quality, build quality, comfort, isolation, versatility, design, to let you guys grasp what T-Peos offered this time round and some of the wonderful changes been made after listening to our feedback. There's also going to be several H-200 reviews coming out soon, to my understanding there will be 2 reviews for each of the 3 demo units, I really don't want to flood people or overload them in one go, so today we'll cover the basics. Another thing I must add, my H-100's are currently on their way back from a loan period, I don't have them to compare, unfortunately.


Accessories included:

1. leather pouch
2. 3 pairs of dual color silicone ear tips
3. 3 pairs of standard silicone ear tips
4. 6.5mm audio jack
5. pair of form tips
6. Red braided cable without mic
7. Black cable with mic
8. Shirt Clip



The leather pouch included is a nice touch, looks great in person, there's a magnetic latch which snaps shut with authority however, I find it rather small for placing H-200 in easily, you really need to wrap them up tightly and the housings seem to insert only a certain way, I worry about putting strain on the cable plugs simply stuffing them inside. It would of been nice to see an extra 5mm width making storage for H-200 easier. The included tips are of high quality silicon, especially the greyish ones (see photo) which have thick walls, feel rather squishy and increase comfort levels. I can't say the largest size is very big compared to the black silicon provided or your standard large in size slicon tip.. There's also a red pair of foam tips which many of you may not of seen before, very much resembling Vsonics GR07 (silicon) stock tips.

You have two detachable cables which includes a mic'd cable in black sheathed below the Y spilt, plus a second braided cable coated in red rubber. Both appear to have decent build quality / quite sturdy around the strain reliefs and Y spilt. Both cables support right angle (L) jacks which is a great thing, (more companies should follow this trend), this shows T-Peos are thinking ahead and listening . The problem I see here with the black cable is it doesn't support cable cinch while the red cable does, I don't understand why the black cable has no cinch, maybe on purpose to avoid pinching the mic. I haven't tried the mic cable so cannot comment on compatibility, , hopefully another review can!

The detachable feature works surprisingly well, both plugs push into the housing socket about 80% before you're greeted with a firm "click" locking them in place, removing the cable is much the same. What I like to do is pull the cable plug a touch which reverses it back to 80% then use my nail and two finger grabing the gap and pulling the plug out slowly. I would not recommend a clean and jerk when removing the cable, treat them with care, do this slowly and steadily. Anyone who has owned Triple-Fi 10 and undergone a cable change will understand the benefit of patience.


Build Quality / Comfort / Isolation / Design / Fit / Microphonics



H-200's housings are made from brass designed to be worn down, I have tried wearing them over the ear which is possible without to much fuss. When unattached from the cable each housing weighs approximately 4.3 grams so they're rather light for something looking a little over sized, actually lighter than H-100 was. I will say each housing in person looks smaller than photo's online suggest, I was expecting them to resembe two tanks but was greeted with a suitable size that works well with my ears. There's a plastic ring on each housing which may also look to cause comfort problems, I can assure you for me this isn't the case because what actually happened on insertion is the housing twist a little so the flattest part of the ring is lined up with my Tragus, I've also found the rings help lock the housings in place, like a foundation that rests on your ear.

When worn H-200 are surprisingly comfortable due to the light weight brass housing, I cannot say it's luxury but enough to forget they're there. I can't say they're going to be a perfect fit for everyone either, but for me work no problem with decent comfort levels. Isolation for me above average with the stock greyish tips, this will also depend on tip selection and ear geometry. The 6mm nozzles do have decent reach so most shouldn't have a problem getting a seal, deep insertion is really not required for H-200 to sound accurate

Build qualityfor the housings is far above average, they feel sturd somewhat reminding me of two little satellite dishes for some reason, My demo pair did have some light press marks on the rear plastic casing and some fine scratches on the chrome finish, however nothing that made me think unacceptable. I think they could take a drop or two, just don't be running them over in your car. Microphonics are present with both cables in moderate to low levels, it's mostly where the cable above the Y spilt rattles around the sides of your face, the provided cinch on the red cable prevents this by a large percentage, I imagine over the ear will minimize this even further. The included cable clip can also decrease a lot of this cable noise problem on the black cable.


T-PEOS H-200 Sound Quality:





Sources and gear used in the review:

RockboxedPod Video (80GB)
Hisound Rocco BA
Colorfly CK4+
Sansa Clip+
iPod Touch 2G
C&C BH portable Amp
SMSL Silver plated interconnect cable
Street Wires Zn2 copper interconnect cable
P&D Amp-K Pro

All files were 16/44 FLAC files.

(Majority of listening was done with Colorfly CK4 / C&C BH / SMSL silver plated / Clip+ / iDevices)


Tonality:

I want to get this out of the way first, because H-100 was known as particularly bright sounding to many users, H-200 although sharing a similar name has undergone drastic changes, H-200 is now much closer to neutral in tonality, if not a touch warm, there's no resemblance between H-100 and H-200 in this area. If I had to label H-200 to an earphone I have heard and match tonality I would be speaking somewhere around TF10's regions, that's the closest I have heard to give you guys a rough estimate, though certainly not leaning cold or cool like the previous model. Tips / sources will also contribute here, but I want to assure those who found H-100 bright be prepared for the change.

Lows:

H-200's low end is neither forward or back, you'll hear me say this for a large majority of the sound impression because it really does stay neutral and balanced. Being a hybrid bass is rather well separated from mids and highs, (this is a trend and advantage of hybrid designs), there's more mid-bass presence than H-100 which helps fill out the lower mids / upper bass regions which some found absent previously. I wouldn't call it excessive amounts, nothing like mid bass found on Westone 3, but more subtle presence filling out the lower mid / upper bass regions. Bass presence is rather full sounding with high amounts of clarity and much better control, it's tight punchy and somewhat powerful when asked upon. H-200's also has a wonderful ability to express great detail and texture in lower regions. There's also great speed keeping in touch with the BA's so there isn't any disjointedness I could detect.

To sum up the low end this much reminds me of a floor standing house speaker, with the right source it fills out the spectrum's needed and behaves well. I wouldn't be to concerned about reaching deep into sub-bass regions, most tracks I've tried such as Phaeleh - Afterglow will demonstrate how capable H-200 low end is, putting IEM like TF10 to shame in detail, depth, texture and extension, not so much pounding bass, more like a big bubble of clarity that surges or pulses in lower sections of the stage, also laying across the stage width ways quite well. (I really would of liked to compare the low end to GR07 MK2 though do not have that IEM with me at present)

Mids:

The mids are a touchy spot, H-100's main issue especially lacking with vocals which sounded sucked out or hollow, there was also an tinge with timbre that would peak in the upper mid range. This is where the major improvement has been made which differentiates the two into completely different earphones. There's much more mid range presence this time round, now balanced instead of V / U shape previously, there's no recession they're not forward but neutral, no longer sounding thin or hollow, that suck out in lower mids has been completely repaired, the peak in upper mids that haunted me with H-100 has completely been taken out of the equation. Overall it's rather pleasant and much thicker compared to before, the warmer tone makes this sit well. So instead, you're greeted with mid range presence, exceptional detail leaving IEM's like TF10 far behind. the mid range is indeed balanced with the low and highs displaying good transparency, resolution, and clarity levels are rather high as is layering.

It's very easy to hear little nuances in passages, from all left / right / centre channels, especially when micro detail decay is concerned often hanging around for quite some time. Attack and speed are also a strong suit of H-200's mid range, somewhat like the bass H-200's mids can sound to me rather powerful when called upon or when lifting volume to higher levels. But again balance is what H-200 is about this time round, lifting the volume everything will come up together as one. I wouldn't call it the most detailed IEM I have heard however, that will depend on what you've heard, how strong your sources are, and personal preference, but confidently far above levels of other IEM in this price range, I do find H-200 punching above it's weight and rather enjoy the repaired mid range with female vocals. Because it sounds full H-200's suited to a wider variety of genres, such as rock, or heavy metal. I have tested several genres without a problem. There's also a specific timbre which I wouldn't call the most natural I've heard though works rather well with percussion instruments.

Highs:

Again, like the mid range and lows we speak about balance, H-200's highs have good presence they won't sound forward or recessed, but instead quite neutral with good extension, they're much smoother than the previous model showing good sparkle and detail. Some found H-100's high end fatiguing, but lowered tone across the entire frequency range prevents this for H-200. if I really had to call it they might be a touched relaxed at times for me but really balance is a strong suit. I have mentioned sometimes wheI really lift volume levels the low end and mids might come a touch forward over the highs though never to the point of being drowned or absent. Highs are a huge improvement over the previous model with increased detail / imaging yet remain softer / smoother will maintaining sparkle.


Soundstage:

The soundstage shows decent width, I have heard wider from my RDB+ v1 and other IEM's in this price range some even cheaper but there is enough width without feeling closed in, there will be times I would usually hear left and right samples further out on each side of my head, the centre channel depth however is rather strange as with certain tips I personally feel a forward projection onto my forehead, it's a strange sensation that sometimes tricks me being unable to pin point exactly how far forward or back vocals should be in a song.

I must say it's a welcomed feeling but one that some might find strange if unexperienced. I am very interested if others hear this because I cannot replicate the sensation using T-Peos's included stock grey tips. Instead, with an after market tip I would like others to try. So, no H-200 doesn't have the widest stage to my ears, it's not congested or the most airy I've heard though certainly above enjoyable. It also doesn't have the most height from my collection, I think maybe using a larger bore tip than those provided will open up the presentation. Not congested but not particularly airy like I found H-100.





Seperation / Imaging:


Instrument separation is solid especially when it comes to channel separation between the left / right ./ centre channels, they both have good depth and syncronize especially well. Because the mid range is rather transparent this supports the separation of H-200 making very easy pickings of one instrument at a time. Even though the stage could be wider I don't feel any congested however a little more air would create a sense of space here. Overall, you won't get that metronome effect I've experienced with Brainwav B2 or Rockits R-50, not quite as aggressive, and I would place the separation roughly in the zone of TF10 possibly a little higher.

Imaging is rather strong and quite precise, especially in mid range and treble regions, I notice treble detail in different areas that my RDB+ V1 cannot pick up whether it is back left, top right etc.. H-200 pulls this off nicely, instrument placement is strong as is micro detailing samples precise, imaging can also keep up with fast paced tracks that my RDB+v1 cannot image properly, I have heard imaging on R-50 in the past which will give H-200 a run for it's money and Brainwavs B2 could probably show up for a battle though overall it's a strong area that H-200 can hold it's own.


Amping:



Let me get this clear as there's been some previous confusion, H-200 does not require an amp, it can be driven efficiently straight from Sansa Clip+ without a problem to ear breaking levels. If you wish to amp H-200 it will respond accordingly, there's no problem feeding it extra power but at 22 Ohms I really don't see the need for it. You can add something like C&C BH (shown in picture) taking advantage of the (LF) Low Field switch to increase clarity tighten up the low end, increase treble slap, you will gain a more powerful presentation but really for those accustom to using their iPhone ./ iPod Touch or iPod, H-200 will be fine. I do run them amped most of the time but a large majority of my demo time was spent with Clip+, iPod touch, iPod classic straight from their headphone outs.

Versaility:

H-200 worked especially well with my acoustic albums, vocals are a strong suit as is percussion and timbre, rock was tested as was metal because H-100 was not capable of pulling off such genres well, because of the corrected issues H-200 has not let me down with one genre yet, I cannot say it is the master of any but faulted for me with none, which is a great improvement because suiting a wider variety of people is a better thing for everyone.








Conclusion:

I think the fact T-Peos have listened to H-100 owners and addressed all these issues is a wonderful thing, they have brought out a great product one I can see being rather popular in coming months, I don't think it's perfect but it sure is a huge step in the right direction. Is it the best Hybrid I have heard? Hmm, close but not quite, it does surpass my RDB+ V1 in some areas, and considering the RDB+ v1 is a $650 Hyrbid vs a $250 that is quite an accomplishment, I would of like to see a little more soundstage width present, and possibly a touch more height, but really I am just nit picking because H-200 has come a very long way from what we heard on the previous model. H-200 will suit a much larger audience and those in doubt before, might find themselves terribly surprised even shocked at the changes this time round, the mid range has been cured, the treble softened, the entire signature more audiophile based giving balance. T-Peos need a big thank you for creating something special, and I must say a rather interesting design of any IEM have come across yet. I think for the $200 price tag (Head-Fi Promo price) H-200 punches well above that, and in good time members will give the full answer just how well H-200 performs.

I am but one person, one person with different preferences needs and requirements, but I can say H-200 will fit in with the right crowd and time will answer for the improvements made this time round. I cannot fault the earphone with anything glaring., especially when the older problems are concerned, as much has been addressed we wanted and some more.


I'm interested, Where do I purchase H-200?

You can find out more about that here and, the wonderful deal T-Peos is offering the community.

http://www.head-fi.org/t/660213/t-peos-new-iem-h-200-released-preselling-limited-100-units

H20