Andrew_WOT
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2004
- Posts
- 8,225
- Likes
- 2,552
From your experience, is there any difference in USB playback quality between these two OS when using ASIO4LL?
Originally Posted by El_Doug /img/forum/go_quote.gif if you are using ASIO, and are using the same software player as well as hardware configuration, there probably is no difference I went from XP ASIO to Vista standard, and can't tell a difference. ymmv, depending on how "good of a listener" you are |
Originally Posted by Quaddy /img/forum/go_quote.gif vista for me is a more reliable connection out to usb than xp, i much prefer 5the sound of vista, its purer and richer than xp |
Originally Posted by WittyzTH /img/forum/go_quote.gif Vista with WASAPI is better than XP with ASIO, IMO. |
Originally Posted by Andrew_WOT /img/forum/go_quote.gif Technically if ASIO4ALL is properly set up they should be identical. What difference do you hear? Thanks |
Originally Posted by WittyzTH /img/forum/go_quote.gif It should be like that, but to me the WASAPI has fuller sound than ASIO4ALL. dunno why though.. EDIT: The difference is not like day and night, but I can hear it. My system is PC >> SPDIF >> DLIII >> Raptor >> W3000. |
Originally Posted by Andrew_WOT /img/forum/go_quote.gif Can you please describe your XP and Vista setup, did you use ASIO4ALL in both cases? |