Why 24 bit audio and anything over 48k is not only worthless, but bad for music.

Apr 22, 2025 at 9:15 AM Post #3,616 of 3,616
I recently discovered a lot of new great indie-bands (unsigned as well as proper indie, not affiliated to one of the big labels) who only release their music as 320kbps AAC, no hi-res available. I don't notice anything missing or wrong in the sound, just brilliant new music.

An artist I like posted music files on Bandcamp years ago but only in high bitrate mp3, I sent him an email asking for flac, he replied - why do you want flac? I thought if a musician thinks mp3 is all you need they must be good enough.

And yes, hi-res files are rather large. Storage space is not overly expensive, but making proper backups for archival & cold storage and reorganising music file folders/libraries is very slow with all those big hi-res files.

For me it's a throw back to when Daps had little storage, 2gb or less. I needed to choose carefully which albums I wanted on them. Once I bought two 8gb daps and stored half alphabetically on one and the rest on the other, which wasn't ideal. Now I have up to 512gb cards for stability and have lots of space but still prefer to load mp3 files over an album getting on for 1gb.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top