TPA6120A2 Question

Jun 14, 2008 at 5:11 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 7

odigg

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Posts
868
Likes
26
Hi,

I'm looking at the spec of this chip and it states that it can pump out 1.5W into 32 ohms, or 80mw into 600 ohms.

In contrast, the CK2III specs state it can 1.4W into 33 ohms and 0.15W into 330 ohms.

So is the TPA6120A2 capable of providing more power output than the CK2III? I know this seems like a very basic question, but I don't know if there is more to the TPA6120A2 spec than meet the eye. Perhaps the power output is theoretical and the practical output will be less?

As you can guess, I don't know all that much about audio amplifiers.
 
Jun 14, 2008 at 5:50 PM Post #2 of 7
as always in engineering the answer is "it depends"

in this case on power supply V and heatsink capacity

the TPA6120 can put out 400 mA

1/2 *.4^2 * 32 = 2.5 Wrms into 32 Ohm load (with > +/-14 V supply)

the limit is removing heat from the chip, with 2 channels at full power and ~ 70% efficency for linear Class AB you need to keep the chip cool while removing ~1.5-2 Watts of heat - this is doable if you follow the datasheet recommended layout and use solder paste and reflow to connect the PwrPad to a large enough power plane - not as easy for the typical hobbyist but there are hacks that work for hand soldering and getting the heat removal - or a dedicated 32 Ohm headphone amp could use less supply V and lower output power to keep the chip from overheating

at the other extreme the TPA can be used with +/-16 V supply V, and swings to within ~1.5 V of each supply at "light" loads

1/2 * 14^2 / 300 = 320 mWrms into 300 Ohms

So the TPA6120 chip is capable of adequate drive of most headphones depending on how it is applied
 
Jun 15, 2008 at 5:28 PM Post #4 of 7
yes, buffering the input of the TPA is a good idea with most audio source being AC coupled the required input-gnd resistors become noticeable loads to the source

I think the better approach once you've committed to 2 op amps/channel is to multiloop with the better and more powerful TPA replacing Walt Jung's favorite (old) AD811 inside the input "audio" op amp feedback circuit in his multiloop amp circuits
 
Jun 15, 2008 at 11:41 PM Post #5 of 7
Quote:

Originally Posted by jcx /img/forum/go_quote.gif
as always in engineering the answer is "it depends"

in this case on power supply V and heatsink capacity

the TPA6120 can put out 400 mA

1/2 *.4^2 * 32 = 2.5 Wrms into 32 Ohm load (with > +/-14 V supply)

t the other extreme the TPA can be used with +/-16 V supply V, and swings to within ~1.5 V of each supply at "light" loads

1/2 * 14^2 / 300 = 320 mWrms into 300 Ohms

So the TPA6120 chip is capable of adequate drive of most headphones depending on how it is applied



Why do you have the 1/2 in there? I thought the formulas were P = (I^2)xR and P= (E^2)/R.
 
Jun 16, 2008 at 1:24 PM Post #7 of 7
Ahh..sorry. I had assumed it was 14v rms from a regulated supply.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top