Sony DVP-NS700/715/725 and 755 cpompared with NS500 and the older DVP-S7000?

Nov 20, 2003 at 4:17 AM Thread Starter Post #1 of 10

NEO

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Dec 1, 2002
Posts
929
Likes
10
I am confusing about Sony DVP-NS500 and the higher DVP-NS700P/715P/725P/755V. I know that NS500 has a good audio and can play SACD. But why can't some model like NS700/ 715 and 725P play SACD? Seems that NS755V is the one that can play SACD as well. Can anyone tell me the difference between these four DVP-NS7xx models? Do they have goood ausio quality a nd which one should I go for? Another option is DVP-NS7000 which is the old but high end model. I heard DVP-NS7000 is great as a cd transport but have no idea about the video quality compared with the newer progressive scan models like NS500a nd NS7xx series. I would appreciate the opinion from the current/previous users of these models.
Thanks,
NEO
 
Nov 22, 2003 at 2:09 AM Post #3 of 10
I happen to have the NS-700V

SACD playback is good, although not as good as dedicated players of the same price, but since I bought this unit primarely for its dvd performance this did not matter.

Video quality is above average, compared to the JVC (that would go well with my TV) it was miles better, sharper and more colourful overall, this was with RGB output to a high quality thor scart BTW.

CD performance is, well... very poor.
there isn't much to tell, it's saving grace is perhaps there's a good amount of detail and reasonable imaging, but even my older redbook players blow it away in the PRaT department, this is also very noticeable on my speakers.
Also bass is good but the top end is grainy, this was most noticeable when I used the RS-2 on it, the SR 125 seemed more forgiving to this.
Since the tweeters in my speaker system are pretty poor I cannot comment on this aspect on speakers............
Audio performance is good, my parents used the internal decoder when they had borrowed the unit from me for a while, and it did not dissapoint, except for those irritating fake sony surround modes, worthless.
standard dolby digital and dolby surround work best IMO.
coax and optical outputs are very decent, I never had locking errors on the unit going to my sony dolby digital receiver.

In short, picture and sonics are quite good VFM, just nothing spectacular.

Audio-wise, my superdac lifts it up an another class however
smily_headphones1.gif
as a transport it is pretty good actually, even if the unit itself is perhaps a bit flimsy compared to a marantz or nad.

I paid 400 euro's or something like that for the player, I think its pretty good value if you happen to be big into movies and care less for super audio cd and redbook, but would appreciate to have these options available just in case.

Basically you cannot go wrong with all these sony players when it comes to price vs performance, IMO they are good but not exciting like the pioneers which are a bit more value for money according to a lot of people (I would have bought a pioneer if I had invested a bit later)
 
Nov 22, 2003 at 3:27 AM Post #4 of 10
It's a bit disappointed to hear that NS700 has poor audio. I am concerned that the audio quallity of other NS-7xx series would be similar. It's weird since NS500 got a great review on its audio performance. Meybe the older DVP-S7000 is the better choice for all around player (it doesn't have SACD and Progressive scan though).
 
Nov 22, 2003 at 1:56 PM Post #5 of 10
Why dont you just get a used NS500V? There are plenty on Audiogon. The SACD performance is nice and the cd although being nothing to write home about still holds its own. At $130-$150 used you cant lose.
 
Nov 22, 2003 at 6:06 PM Post #6 of 10
Quote:

Originally posted by NEO
It's a bit disappointed to hear that NS700 has poor audio. I am concerned that the audio quallity of other NS-7xx series would be similar. It's weird since NS500 got a great review on its audio performance. Meybe the older DVP-S7000 is the better choice for all around player (it doesn't have SACD and Progressive scan though).


I was comparing redbook performance to performance you would get from similar dedicated players.
You get what you pay for with a sony, they are really great value for money, do not get me wrong on this.

Much like a multichannel receiver, for these multiplayers you really need to triple the price to get similar performance to a seperate player.

Redbook annoyed me only for the fact that my older players sounded much more fluid, more rhythmic and extended, I cannot explain this except to blame the lifeless dac on the sony and its poor clock + powersupply.
 
Nov 22, 2003 at 10:33 PM Post #7 of 10
What confused me most was that how come NS500V is better than the higher NS-7xx series. It also has SACD while not every 7xx seeries has this capability. Does Sony intentionally put more features and performance into NS500V then?

Spent&Bent..just wonder, is your Sony DVP-NS700P? You said it is 700V but there is only 700P on the US market and 755V is the only model that play SACD.
 
Nov 24, 2003 at 10:53 PM Post #8 of 10
Quote:

Originally posted by bundee1
Why dont you just get a used NS500V? There are plenty on Audiogon. The SACD performance is nice and the cd although being nothing to write home about still holds its own. At $130-$150 used you cant lose.



CD performance of the NS500V nothing to write home about? Boy are you demanding
cool.gif
How good does $200 CD performance have to get to write home about in your terms? I have an NS500V and am extremely happy with it in all fronts, as a DVD player, of course as an SACD player, but also as a CD player. Particularly given what I paid for it, US $200 new a year and a half ago. With respect to its CD playback capabilities, have you seen the following:

http://www.avguide.com/newsletter/AV...2/sony_dvp.jsp

That review puts the NS500V in the same league as dedicated CD-only players like the Rega planet.

http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/volum...r-10-2002.html

Section "Comparing CD playback to the Sony SACD/DVD DVP-NS500V" of that review places the Sony above the NAD 541i in standard CD playback quality.


Well, but those are just 2 reviews someone might say, maybe matters of opinion. In my particular system (Sony NS500V player-->Outlaw Audio's ICBM->Marantz SR-4000 receiver-->Paradigm speakers+subs, or Grado's SR-60's) I like the CD playback throught the analog outs of this player (meaning the player doing the PCM decoding) better than to have the Marantz decode the coax-digital out of the player. The sound of voices in particular is more natural and smooth (less "digital" as people usually refer to that). Also voices and sounds in general are more precisely localizable in the soundstage when the player is decoding instead of my receiver. Anyway, even though I think my Marantz sounds good enough already when decoding PCM, but when this Sony does the decoding it just sounds better to me.


I should say, however, that I have two complains about the NS500V:

1) A minor one, when playing DVD's and there is a layer change, there is a slightly annoying pause that freezes the image for almost a second.

2) A not so minor one: between CD/SACD playback modes on the one hand , and Dolby Digital or DTS on the other, all through the analog outs of the player, there is a MAJOR bass level inconsistency. Let me elaborate on this a bit because I haven't seen this issue pointed out anywhere with respect to any universal or multiformat player.

Again I have an Outlaw Audio ICBM and 2 subwoofers. Have all speakers set to large in the player, and do all bass management in the analog domain with the ICBM, which is connected between the NS500V and my Marantz receiver. The player doing the decoding, so the receiver is in "multichannel amplifier-only" mode so to speak. I calibrate my system's bass using Stereophile Test CD 2. So notice, that's an optimal calibration for CD playback. There's no Stereophile Test *SACD* yet, with bass warble tones encoded in DSD, or not that I know of from any source. So I was trusting that calibrating using bass warble tones in a CD would yield a satisfactory calibration for SACD playback. In fact, with the CD-based bass calibration, the bass from SACD in the NS-500V sounds basically flawless, or I should say as good as it can get in my system, and IMHO.

How about DD/DTS playback using the same CD-based calibration? Well, that's a whole different story.

Using that same CD-based bass calibration, and still having the NS500V instead of the receiver doing the DD or DTS decoding, the bass is noticeably weaker than it should be. And I mean way weaker, more than 6dB's below where it should be.

Because of that inconsistency, when I play DVD's I actually do set the receiver to do the decoding, and I switch to a special calibration I've done for Dolby Digital playback using the AVIA calibration DVD. And I assume calibrating for dolby digital works for DTS. Same as for SACD, there is no DTS-specific calibration disc with bass warble tones encoded in that format, at least not that I know of.

In summary, when playing CD's or SACD's I use calibration A, which is based on PCM-encoded bass warble tones, using Stereophile Test CD2, player doing the decoding. And when playing DVD's I use Dolby digital-encoded bass calibration tones, using the AVIA calibration DVD, receiver doing the decoding.

The difficult thing is tweaking the system parameters (ICBM crossovers, the subwoofer's crossovers and volume levels, receivers sub volume etc) to flatten the bass in both setups. But once all those parameters are satisfactorily found, switching between the two choices is relatively easy, basically a matter of changing the overall bass level either in the ICBM or in the receiver + enabling or disabling the receiver as the decoder.

In any case, it's an extra hassle that true bass consistency in the different formats supported by the player would have eliminated from the shoulders of the user. That's why it's one of my complaints.

Other than that, I have no complaints about CD playback quality per se from the NS500V, most importantly considering its very affordable price, and all the things besides CD playback that it also does very well.

Cheers,
Raul
 
Nov 25, 2003 at 4:08 AM Post #9 of 10
At its price point (especially used) the cd playback is good, but I also have a Music Hall MMF CD25 and I wouldnt trade it for the Sony. The SACD part sounds awesome. The reason the NS500V sounds better than newer players is because it was part of the first wave of DVD/SACD players along with the NS900v and the other ES player whose model I forget. The SCD-CE775 supposedly sounds better than the NS500V but its also more expensive. I guess Sony wanted to impress the massess with its awesome budget gear and get them on the SACD bandwagon. I think both players originally retailed for double what they cost in the end. If I was just starting a system or going back to basics
(which Ive thought of doing many times) I'd get an SCD-CE775, a NAD 320BEE, PSB ALPHA 2Bs, and signalcables all around. All used probably under $500.
 
Nov 25, 2003 at 4:51 AM Post #10 of 10
Quote:

Originally posted by bundee1
If I was just starting a system or going back to basics
(which Ive thought of doing many times) I'd get an SCD-CE775, a NAD 320BEE, PSB ALPHA 2Bs, and signalcables all around. All used probably under $500. [/B]



With respect to your speaker suggestion, have read good reviews but never heard the PSB's myself. Now, not only I've read many good reviews, I own Paradigm Titans and Atoms, have had them for two years now. They are absolutely amazing, highly recommended.

And now that you mention NAD, incidentally I recently almost stopped by a NAD dealer in Destin FL coming back from a business trip, but I wasn't sufficiently "phase coherent" (e.g. they were closing when I arrived
cool.gif
, bad timing). Will pay a visit soon. I believe a brand new NAD 320 BEE is actually around $400. I'm very value and cost/benefit oriented, so instead of getting a dedicated headphone amp, I keep some thoughts about going for a good integrated amp like that NAD, or maybe even a higher priced one (Creek 5350SE, Arcam A85), which allegedly have very high quality headphone jacks.

By the way, wonder if there are some threads here comparing/reviewing headphone jacks of integrated amps.

Cheers,
Raul
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top