daphox
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2003
- Posts
- 152
- Likes
- 0
Been lurking the forum for awhile & have gotten the impression that many around are pretty "audio consious" people. Now to my q:
When seeing the topics, most posts are 'bout the ipod or some Sony device. Nothing strange about this....but since so many seem so informed about dif. devices/AUDIO QUALITY(?), nobody mentions Sharp!?
Everyone discusses the new Sony HD3, but what about this one?: http://www.sharp.co.uk/products/product.asp?id=927
It's no secret that Sharp's MDs sq whips Sony's sound big time!! with the auvi-amp, & even did it before with the "regular" MD's. How come no one even mentions/considers the Sharp HD? I've already seen comments about the Sony sounding "tinny". Due to Sharp's trackrecord this wouldn't be the case with their HD.
I mean come on, although I'm a fan of the ipod I personally would drop it in a second if only the Sharp had Macsupport...
Why are so many checking only Sony? *sigh*
When seeing the topics, most posts are 'bout the ipod or some Sony device. Nothing strange about this....but since so many seem so informed about dif. devices/AUDIO QUALITY(?), nobody mentions Sharp!?
Everyone discusses the new Sony HD3, but what about this one?: http://www.sharp.co.uk/products/product.asp?id=927
It's no secret that Sharp's MDs sq whips Sony's sound big time!! with the auvi-amp, & even did it before with the "regular" MD's. How come no one even mentions/considers the Sharp HD? I've already seen comments about the Sony sounding "tinny". Due to Sharp's trackrecord this wouldn't be the case with their HD.
I mean come on, although I'm a fan of the ipod I personally would drop it in a second if only the Sharp had Macsupport...
Why are so many checking only Sony? *sigh*