Just wanted to go on record here with some new information. I have been fiddling with my reference system and I have been doing informal A-B-A-B-A-B comparisons of the stock cables without the BPT components and the Cardas cables with the BPT components. I don't think I can hear any differences. In other words, I am not so sure anymore if the BPT components are delivering greater "blackgrounds" and clarity or resolution. Likewise, I am having a hard time hearing any differences between the typical reviews of my Cardas Golden Reference cables and my stock 18AWG zip A/C along with Blue Jeans Cables Stereo RCA cables. By nature, I am neither a subjectivist 110% nor an objectivist 110% either. I thought to let everybody know this. I have been struggling to hear any differences for a few days and I have reiterated my findings privately with Wmcmanus through a private message. I may change my review to reflect my findings, but I have work and a USPS 473 Exam this week.
I don't think I am inexperienced when it comes to high end headphone high fidelity. I don't think I am a terrible audio writer or a writer in general. I don't think that my equipment is sub-par and it lacks resolution -- or do I. I am beginning to think that like many consumers of our hobby, I have been pre-conditioned to believe in professional reviews as a preset before I own the equipment myself. This seems to be even more so reinforced by my recent findings which have become the crux of this reply post with regard to cables and power conditioners.
I had the same results when I owned the PS Audio xStream Plus A/C. I could barely hear any differences between that A/C and stock cords, but I went on to write my review anyway. It was archived. I am really beginning to think that I ought to revise my BPT review. Look, part of the reason why I skimped on the performance of my reference system when it was hooked up to the BPT components is contained in this reply post. I was not sure if I heard any improvements whatsoever. So, I made general statements based upon references to other published BPT reviews as a sort of temporary solution to a dilemma I was facing.
I know how unreliable A-B-A-B-A-B tests are, but you have to realize that I have no access to other control / variable test subjects or a scientific laboratory to conduct proper double blind ABX tests either. So, I am doing what I see 90% of other hobbyists turned professional reviewers are doing: informal sighted testing for subjective listening conclusions. I am telling you right now that I can not reliably detect any major differences by the time I am doing the final A-B tests.