old Luxman M-120A vs Marantz MS-9S2
Jun 15, 2009 at 10:00 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 4

.Sup

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Feb 21, 2009
Posts
3,587
Likes
120
Location
Ljubljana
So I'm having a debate with someone from some other forum and he has the 40 year old Luxman power amp and he says it performs almost as good as the two 9k monoblocks from Marantz. What are your thoughts, can it perform that well? Surely it would be worth a lot if that is true. I need an honest answer.
Thanks
 
Jun 16, 2009 at 12:18 AM Post #2 of 4
You mean the Marantz MA-9S2?
IIRC the Luxman M-120a was manufactured in the early 80's. It was the forerunner to the more famous M-02. A lot of Luxman amps of that time were really nice (M-117, M-03, M-05, MX-100). They had a very tubey sound, quiet, silky smooth, lovely highs, slightly rounded and loose bass. Difficult speakers that dipped below 4 ohms could cause a little harshness, but this was rare. You could set two of them up as monoblocks putting out 300 watts per channel. The last M-120a that I saw sold went for $400 in very good condition.

That being said, you're comparing apples and oranges. The Luxman is a vintage amp and uses vintage parts. Even though the Luxman is well-built, the Marantz build quality is exceptional and all the parts are of the highest quality and latest technology. Even taking inflation into account, the Luxman would sell new today for less than half of what the Marantz goes for. I have to admit that I haven't heard them, but I would have to believe that they would be more detailed and dynamic than the Luxman with tighter, better bass.

I have heard the M-120a, M-02, and spent a fair amount of time with the M-117. I have also spent time listening to the Marantz MA-700 monoblocks. Even though I prefer the Luxman M-117, it was close. The Marantz MA-9S2 is in a different class altogether.
 
Jun 16, 2009 at 10:39 PM Post #4 of 4
Find a copy of Masters and Clark's 1980s article "Do all amplifiers sound the same ?" this will be a good starting point as it suggests that very different amps (some $12K and some $200) may be indistinguishable.

But the short answer is why not ?

There is nothing magical about amplifier design it is all about phsyics and price/age/quality are not closely correlated (within limits) , anything competent with sufficient power from the 80s onwards would be perfectly capable of high fidelity performance, (excepting bizarre speaker loads) also hunt down the Stereophile Carver challenge - another good read ...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top