Lossless FLAC albums are often more expensive than buying the CD on Amazon
Jan 4, 2017 at 3:55 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 2

Bykhoff

Head-Fier
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Posts
59
Likes
12
and I think that it's absurd. I'd rather have professionally pressed hardcopy with the original booklet than just a digital version. It just doesn't make sense to buy FLAC downloads for a higher price, unless you must have 24-bit recordings.
 
Discuss!
 
Jan 4, 2017 at 7:05 PM Post #2 of 2
  and I think that it's absurd. I'd rather have professionally pressed hardcopy with the original booklet than just a digital version. It just doesn't make sense to buy FLAC downloads for a higher price, unless you must have 24-bit recordings.
 
Discuss!

 
I agree.
 
Unless they've been remastered, to a higher sound quality (not always the case, but sometimes is), in which case I will sometimes choose to pay a little more for a download.
 
Even then, though, I don't like paying more for a download than a CD.
 
 
Music companies whinge and moan about falling sales, but they keep price-gouging, even though the costs for them of publishing via digital downloads are lower than pressing thousands of CDs. They drive themselves out of business with their decades-old incessant greed.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top