I bought a pair of "as-is for repair/parts" he560 off ebay to play with. It is the "adorama exclusive" V4 version and seller was adorama so I suppose it was a customer-returned unit.
Phones were in pretty good condition, probably used very little before being returned.
The symptom was "audio only come out of right side". measured at the phone jack (inside the ear cup, after removing the grill),
-- right driver DC resistance is 40 ohms,
-- left driver measured open.
left (open) driver inspection:
by measuring the continuity along the silver traces on the diaphragm, I could more or less pin-point the location where the discontinuity happen, but did not see the crack in the coating (under ~20x magnification). so it was a very fine crack. Then I noticed the diaphragm is attached to the magnet bar around that area, instead of having an air gap between the diaphragm and the magnet.
red-circled areas = diaphragm glued to magnet
(the blue arrow points to the location of coating crack but that is on the other side of the magnet bar, not visible in the photo below)
white-circled area = good air gap
I guess what might have happened was:
1) some kind of glue contamination got under the magnet bar and glued the diaphragm to the magnet bar.
2) because the rest of the diaphragm could still vibrate and make sound, the driver passed the "sound check" ( ? but it probably would not sound the same as a normal driver)
3) the "glued" area becomes a stress point. After some use, the diaphragm film stretched at that location but the conductive coating couldn't stretch to the same degree ==> micro-crack formed in the coating ==> open circuit.
kind of a strange failure mode. I supposed by the time the diaphragm assembly was attached to the magnet plate assembly, the epoxy holding the magnet bars should have hardened fully (otherwise the magnet bars will move and slam into each other). Then when did this (wet glue) contamination occur?
The good news is, this problem is easy to detect via visual inspection, just remove the grill and take a look. (But visual inspections should have been done (multiple times) during manufacturing process... instead of being performed by the end user )
Phones were in pretty good condition, probably used very little before being returned.
The symptom was "audio only come out of right side". measured at the phone jack (inside the ear cup, after removing the grill),
-- right driver DC resistance is 40 ohms,
-- left driver measured open.
left (open) driver inspection:
by measuring the continuity along the silver traces on the diaphragm, I could more or less pin-point the location where the discontinuity happen, but did not see the crack in the coating (under ~20x magnification). so it was a very fine crack. Then I noticed the diaphragm is attached to the magnet bar around that area, instead of having an air gap between the diaphragm and the magnet.
red-circled areas = diaphragm glued to magnet
(the blue arrow points to the location of coating crack but that is on the other side of the magnet bar, not visible in the photo below)
white-circled area = good air gap
I guess what might have happened was:
1) some kind of glue contamination got under the magnet bar and glued the diaphragm to the magnet bar.
2) because the rest of the diaphragm could still vibrate and make sound, the driver passed the "sound check" ( ? but it probably would not sound the same as a normal driver)
3) the "glued" area becomes a stress point. After some use, the diaphragm film stretched at that location but the conductive coating couldn't stretch to the same degree ==> micro-crack formed in the coating ==> open circuit.
kind of a strange failure mode. I supposed by the time the diaphragm assembly was attached to the magnet plate assembly, the epoxy holding the magnet bars should have hardened fully (otherwise the magnet bars will move and slam into each other). Then when did this (wet glue) contamination occur?
The good news is, this problem is easy to detect via visual inspection, just remove the grill and take a look. (But visual inspections should have been done (multiple times) during manufacturing process... instead of being performed by the end user )