Fubar II DAC

Mar 21, 2007 at 5:25 PM Post #2 of 9
Without any direct comparison or guarantees that it isn't just placebo, I'd have to say the SoundBlaster Live! I'm using at the moment sounds much less lively that the EMU0404, so yeah the DAC should make an audible difference as long as the two are far apart enough in terms of quality.
 
Mar 21, 2007 at 7:49 PM Post #4 of 9
Well I have a sb Live! and now have onboard audio HD and I did notice a slight improvement when using foobar with 32-bit processing. Although the increace in SQ might be due to the increase resolution
 
Mar 24, 2007 at 9:40 PM Post #7 of 9
To help clarify for the OP, I was just cruising by, and notice that Aris misunderstood, and seems to be talking about Fubar the program, and not Fubar II the Dac. One is software and the other is hardware, one plays tunes and the other is a DAC.
wink.gif


I can't offer any help on how the TBAAM is improved upon or not when compared to the Fubar II but I'm curious myself, so here's a thread bump.
smily_headphones1.gif
 
Apr 14, 2007 at 5:21 AM Post #9 of 9
Quote:

Originally Posted by souperman /img/forum/go_quote.gif
i've decided that the fubar was not an improvement at all. it did not make ANY difference!
frown.gif



since your TBAAM is already good enough?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top