Another convert: Sony ST-S530ES Tuner
Jul 30, 2005 at 4:43 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 14

Duncan

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jun 26, 2001
Posts
13,473
Likes
1,813
Just picked this up from the local pawn shop today, is 1989ish vintage, and has the normal higher end features including things like hi-blend, and a calibration tone, its digital... so the analogue purists will turn their noses up at it, but I can instantly say that this tuner (that cost from what I understand, about $400 back in the day) is the best that i've ever heard of FM, massively dynamic (compared to 'normal' tuners), great soundstage / seperation, and that Hi-Blend thing works brilliantly for the weaker stations, cleans them up nicely
biggrin.gif


Now I guess to look out for one of those Sansui TX1s...
wink.gif
 
Jul 30, 2005 at 4:49 PM Post #2 of 14
Quote:

Originally Posted by Duncan
Just picked this up from the local pawn shop today, is 1989ish vintage, and has the normal higher end features including things like hi-blend, and a calibration tone, its digital... so the analogue purists will turn their noses up at it, but I can instantly say that this tuner (that cost from what I understand, about $400 back in the day) is the best that i've ever heard of FM, massively dynamic (compared to 'normal' tuners), great soundstage / seperation, and that Hi-Blend thing works brilliantly for the weaker stations, cleans them up nicely
biggrin.gif


Now I guess to look out for one of those Sansui TX1s...
wink.gif



If you see a LEAK Troughline tuner on your travels pick it up for me please!
 
Jul 30, 2005 at 5:30 PM Post #3 of 14
tell me about it! when I was young I was listening on somewhat younger Esprit tuner, the first with RDS - ST-S570ES.. great sound, but the RDS wasn't working completely right.. but the looks!

here's one selling at eBay right now with lots of pics of it..
 
Jul 30, 2005 at 6:23 PM Post #4 of 14
Glassman, that looks a fair bit nicer aesthetically than the older brother that I have...

...If it sounded even half as good as this one (although with Sonys prowess with tuners in the early to mid nineties, it probably sounded better) then it was a great unit!

What was wrong with the RDS? a big flaw?
 
Jul 30, 2005 at 10:35 PM Post #6 of 14
Quote:

Originally Posted by Duncan
For anyone interested, my model is this one
smily_headphones1.gif



I think that it's broken somehow and he's suggesting it to somebody who can repair stuff...just wanted to point that out...

anyway, it looks nice duncan
biggrin.gif
, if there were half-decent radio stations around here, I think there was a sweet tuner from sony on regular ebay a while back that I would've gotten
tongue.gif
 
Jul 30, 2005 at 11:16 PM Post #7 of 14
We need to start a Team Tuner-Fi one of these days. I've been starting to look into them myself recently, as I'm going toward separate components for my home setup. I'll post any findings I have as I have them.
biggrin.gif
 
Jul 31, 2005 at 9:24 AM Post #8 of 14
Quote:

Originally Posted by Duncan
For anyone interested, my model is this one
smily_headphones1.gif



hey! your tuner does DSD, mine didn't! the SQ sure as hell must be brilliant then, just make sure the station plays regular SACD and not just remastered 16/44.1
biggrin.gif
tongue.gif


RDS was working ok for displaying station name and clock, but finding alternative frequencies (AF) didn't work really.. there were some other things it couldn't do that newer devices could, but hey it was the first RDS implementation!
 
Jul 31, 2005 at 11:24 AM Post #9 of 14
Yeah Tuners seem so unfashionable that they are a total sonic bargain if you live anywhere with decent FM. Also worth checking out are the Denon T260L,

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...794054691&rd=1

a classic digital design, and all the NAD stuff both analogue and digital.

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...792594179&rd=1

None of these were that expensive at the time but they performed well beyond their price level and were common so are therefore now very cheap. 10-50UKP.

The Leak Troughline II or III are the most hyped. The II has cool 50's lines and the III is grey and black leatherette.

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...sPageName=WDVW

But you need to either know your way around the insides of a valve/tube unit or spend quite a bit on re-aligning and modding it with offboard stereo-decoders etc. Also you need a serious roof antena as it isn't very sensitive.
So it's only for the collector / true tuner hardcore. That said it's reveered in the UK anyway as the finest tuner ever built.
 
Jul 31, 2005 at 11:36 AM Post #10 of 14
Quote:

Originally Posted by Glassman
hey! your tuner does DSD, mine didn't! the SQ sure as hell must be brilliant then, just make sure the station plays regular SACD and not just remastered 16/44.1
biggrin.gif
tongue.gif



I've been trying to find out what the DSD circuit does... obviously with DSD being for SACD etc, google searches are seemingly very misleading...

What is your take on it Glassman? (Sorry, probably being thick I know lol!)

[Edit]

Seeing that the definition of DSD is:

Direct Stream
D i g i t a l™ ( D S D™) 1-bit
representation of the
audio waveform with
2.8224 MHz sampling
achieves sound quality
unprecedented in
analog or digital audio.

I'm guessing that the digital tuner feed (is there an ADC in digital tuners??) goes in to the DSD circuit and then converted to analogue there... thats pretty cool for an old unit... unless there is more than one term 'DSD'?
 
Aug 1, 2005 at 1:26 AM Post #11 of 14
Prolly DSD != DSD here. "Digital" demod circuits weren't too uncommon back then, now if I just remembered what was hiding behind these (the "direct comparator" lettering on the Sony may be a hint), and who else used 'em... Guess I've been in headphones for too long
tongue.gif
. (Ah well, the guys on FMtuners should know.) The ST-S530ES may have been the little brother of the ST-S730ES, a tuner that is great as long as it's in perfect alignment - which unfortunately it rarely is for very long due to insufficient temperature compensation.

Anyway, I agree that you can get a lot of tuner for relatively little money these days, less so in the states but definitely in ol' Europe. I'm quite happy with my T7500. I recently compared recordings done with the Onkyo a few months back to newer ones from the Grundig and found a slightly lighter sound with a bit less bass in comparison, just like the reviews of the Onkyo had stated. That Grundig is a real nice piece of kit, maybe not with the greatest front-end and selectivity, but certainly a good compromise for someone primarily intending to listen to stronger stations instead of chasing weak DX (however, it does achieve fairly steep filter skirts with its 4 cascaded ceramic filters, it's just that these are wide 280 kHz types). It does a better job keeping the stronger station I usually listen to clean (there's a weaker one 200 kHz below that would introduce some noises on the Onkyo).
 
Aug 1, 2005 at 8:28 AM Post #12 of 14
Thanks for the info sgrossklass
biggrin.gif


It certainly does look like there was a bigger brother to this unit, having opened it up, there is about 1/4 of the PCB that has tracings, but not populated
frown.gif


A question from me, being very naive... the unit only has an 75ohm aerial jack, and I only have an 300ohm aerial... I can pull in the local / powerful stations pretty well, but would an 75ohm aerial help me to pull in weaker ones?

Thanks
biggrin.gif
 
Aug 1, 2005 at 7:47 PM Post #13 of 14
Actually, what you need is a balun to get from a 300 ohm balanced to a 75 ohm unbalanced signal. This page may not be the worst place to start:
http://users.tns.net/~bb/balun.htm
 
Aug 1, 2005 at 8:38 PM Post #14 of 14
Quote:

Originally Posted by PinkFloyd
If you see a LEAK Troughline tuner on your travels pick it up for me please!


If you picked one up from a pawn shop it would probably need re-aligning and/or rebuilding.If it had the original stereo decoder fitted that would also need replacing as it's the weak link in the Troughline
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top