headphone_speaker
Banned
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2008
- Posts
- 59
- Likes
- 0
From the OP, i will choose the option 7200rpm
Originally Posted by Steggy /img/forum/go_quote.gif like i said. its dependent on the sizes of both drives where the 5400 can be as fast. |
Originally Posted by milkpowder /img/forum/go_quote.gif This is very true. Have a look at the THG benchmarks. The newer generation of high capacity (read 320-500GB) 5,400rpm HDDs either come extremely close to or exceed the performance of 7,200rpm HDDs in a multitude of tests, including average read/write transfer, maximum read/write transfer, PCMark file writing, etc... Of course, the 7,200rpm HDDs will be capable of higher I/O per second. |
Originally Posted by milkpowder /img/forum/go_quote.gif This is very true. Have a look at the THG benchmarks. The newer generation of high capacity (read 320-500GB) 5,400rpm HDDs either come extremely close to or exceed the performance of 7,200rpm HDDs in a multitude of tests, including average read/write transfer, maximum read/write transfer, PCMark file writing, etc... Of course, the 7,200rpm HDDs will be capable of higher I/O per second. |
Originally Posted by milkpowder /img/forum/go_quote.gif I can't seem to find a source for the 500GB one. It may not be available yet in the UK. Is 320GB large enough? The Western Digital 320GBP 5400rpm drive is the fastest in its class and equals/beats the Hitachi 200GB 7200rpm in most benchmarks. I doubt you'd notice the difference unless you're running a server where rpm does matter. |
Originally Posted by Al4x /img/forum/go_quote.gif thats what ive got now, a 320gb 5400 WD as a 2ndary and a 200gb 7200 seagate as a primary |