Leteciel Shark

- Introduction -
Hello friends, today in this review we are going to take a look at three driver headphones from Leteciel, priced at 109$.
And these headphones come in a rather small-sized box with a very nice design where on the front part there are as many as three waifu, in the upper left corner there is a company logo, and also here is the name of this new model SHARK, sounds cool agree, and at the back as always indicated technical specifications of the headphones.

- Technical specifications -
Drivers: 1 custom 10mm high performance Beryllium-plated dynamic driver + 2 custom coaxial dynamic driver
Sensivity: 104dB
Impedance: 16Ω
Frequency Range: 20Hz-20kHz
Plug type: 3.5mm jack
- Let's take a look at what's included -
1.High quality audio cable with 2 pin connectors and 3.5 mm jack.


2.Branded case.

3.User manual.

4.Waifu pin.

5.Eartips.

6.Acrylic stand.

7.IEM.
The headphones are quite small, made entirely of black resin, and the front panel here has a very beautiful design with a lot of shimmering crystals that looks very cool, and the Leteciel logo fits perfectly here.

And here there is a standard 2 pin connector for cable connection, and next to it there is a single hole for compensation which fulfills its function well, so when using headphones there is absolutely no vacuum effect and driver flex.

The sound guide in these headphones is not too long, and not very short, as for me it is optimal, made of metal, and has a diameter of 6 mm, and received a protective mesh and a clearly marked edge for better fixation of the ear tips.

And the fit of these headphones is just perfect - no discomfort, even with prolonged use.They are very deep and tightly fixed in the ear, providing excellent sound isolation, while nothing presses or interferes. The anatomical shape has been thought out literally down to the last detail, so there is no desire to take them off as soon as possible. Everything is done so competently that any discomfort is out of the question.

- Tuning and Conception -
And now let's talk about how the Leteciel Shark headphones sound like this is how their frequency response graph looks, these headphones have a 7dB bass boost with a very smooth transition to the lower midrange, and the emphasis in the upper midrange almost perfectly matches my target range, which I am very happy about, so for me personally these headphones do not sound too energetic and tiresome in this range, and the high frequencies are very good here, they are quite long and only fade smoothly after 15 kHz, which is a very good result, and now let's analyze the sound of these headphones in more detail and then compare them with Leteciel Mira and Leteciel Magiris.

- Low Frequencies -
These headphones offer us very confident bass frequencies that are pleasantly perceptible, but do not overwhelm the overall perception. Bass is tight, textured, and with good transparency. It doesn't try to be overly dominant, but remains pronounced enough to add the necessary sense of power and depth and create the right and solid foundation in this range.
And the first thing that is immediately noticeable when listening to the bass is its excellent density. It is not loose, not cotton, but exactly collected and weighty, with a clear form of impact. At the same time I like that it does not have the purpose of excessively taking all the attention on itself, but on the contrary, it just competently creates the necessary volume and warmth, and please note that it does it very discreetly and intelligently.
Sub-bass has a good enough presence, and it is really felt especially in electronic genres and cinematic tracks and even jazz, but it does not dominate. Compared to really bass-heavy headphones where the sub will literally shake the air much more clearly, in the Shark it will be a bit more modest: not as deep and lush, but very controlled and neatly integrated into the mix. It adds a good volume to the sound, but it doesn't buzz and doesn't go into some kind of smearing.
And as far as I'm concerned, the midbass is literally the main strength of these headphones. It's textured, crisp, supple and works well with rhythmic elements. The drums sound very punchy, with a meaty attack and a clear response, and the bass guitar comes across as very tight and with an expressive body. That is, everything sounds mature, there is no bloat, no dryness, but only tight, confident and well articulated clean bass.
And it's important to note that Shark don't try to surprise you with a super huge amount of low frequencies, as it is done by frankly bass-headed models. Everything here is done tastefully, bass is emphasized, yes, but it's not harsh and doesn't invade the midrange at all.
It does not blur and does not climb on vocals, but on the contrary, perfectly supports it, giving the sound body and weight.
In addition, I was surprised by the way Leteciel Shark are able to subtly convey microdynamics in the lower range: in tracks with live recording you can hear how differently the bass behaves depending on the strength of the impact or onslaught of the performer. This indicates good resolution and control, which you will agree not all headphones can give you, but SHARK can and proudly demonstrate it!
And to summarize, the bass in Leteciel Shark is a balanced combination of mass, control and texture. The sub-bass here is a bit more restrained than in Leteciel Magiris flagship, but I think it is completely enough to give good volume and the necessary depth in the sound. The bass here not only gives weight, but also works carefully and precisely on musicality, making the sound more bodied, natural and driving - without overdoing it and without compromise.
- Mid Frequencies -
The midrange of Leteciel Shark is, without exaggeration, one of the strongest and most memorable parts of their sound character. It is built with a clear aim for maximum naturalness, comfort and musicality, but at the same time it doesn't slip into loose or muffled at all. Everything sounds very balanced, restrained and neat, with that insanely pleasant warmth that makes the delivery lively and soulful, but absolutely not intrusive.
The midrange is very warm and slightly softened, but without coloration - there is no so to say artificial “lamplightiness” or excessive smoothing. This is exactly the type of sound that does not tire and does not require getting used to, especially when listening for a long time. Each instrument clearly gets its own space, but does not protrude forward, everything is presented in one piece, literally a single and understandable musical flow.
Special attention should be paid to vocals - both male and female voices in these headphones sound tight, with good body and smoothness of attack, without a hint of subtlety, or any sibilants. Female voices are presented as very airy but warm, male voices are very rich but not harsh, they have a good controlled smoothness.
And note that the whole pitch of this range is built on a pleasant smoothness and neutrality, and that is exactly its strength, there is no over-added intrusiveness, and no pressure on your ear, which is definitely not unpleasant!
And instrumental parts are transmitted naturally, and volumetrically acoustic guitar, piano, strings all sound very pure, and bodily, without any strange timbres or over-emphasized transients, and without blurring details.
As small strokes and small nuances in the attack are transmitted with a slight subtle rounding, which gives the sound a special softened character, but not to the detriment of intelligibility.
And what is particularly valuable in these headphones is the upper midrange (2-4kHz), this is the frequency range where many headphones (in my experience) with more pronounced Harman tuning can sound harsh and aggressive, and fatigue your hearing especially if you like to listen to the headphones at high volume, and this is often more noticeable on kick drums, high female voices and some jazz instruments, but the Shark do without it, I like that their upper midrange is controlled very competently here, without dragging your attention, without straining it, and without provoking that very fatigue.
This part of the range serves more as a very precise link than as a bright amplified accent point.
And to summarize, the midrange in Leteciel Shark is the epitome of comfortable musical neutrality, where warm, smooth presentation is combined with excellent readability and natural texture. They don't try to stand out by being harsh or punchy, but it's in their understated and balanced manner that they present everything in a way that makes you want to listen to them for hours. This is the case when the middle sounds just right, calm, convincing and truly musical.
- High Frequencies -
The high-frequency range in Leteciel Shark is, first of all, the embodiment of a very refined taste and mature approach to tuning. There is no harshness, no artificial shine, no intrusive enhanced brightness here. Instead, what we get here is a gorgeous smoothness, precision, musicality and comfort that is particularly pleasing in longer listening sessions.
Treble attack is slightly soft but not smeared, percussion, cymbals, ringing details are all delivered with just the right amount of emphasis but without added aggression or sibilants. It's especially nice how the Shark work out transients in the upper mids and lower treble, which is where most headphones start to over-emphasize, especially on female vocals or bright instruments like flute or violin. That's not the case here.Control is at a very good level, there's not even a hint of tedious brightness or ringing harshness.
Of course, the treble itself is a bit darkened here, but in the right sense of the word. They are not “squeezed” or simplified, but just a bit muted in their so-called peak energy, so as not to overpower attention and not to cause auditory strain. And this creates a feeling of mature, mature sound, where treble frequencies are not too much protruding, but very organically fit into the overall sound picture, preserving the right sense of airiness and depth.
And I think it is worth noting the accuracy of localization in this range, because even despite the general smoothness, Shark perfectly convey spatial images, cymbal attack, small clicks, hits on the working drum or even barely audible synthetic noises in electronic music are felt structurally and without mush. And that's a testament to sufficient resolution, transparency, and excellent top-end detail.
And as a result, the treble in Leteciel Shark is a perfect balance between comfort, precision and musical expressiveness. They are not bright and not too accentuated, but they have literally everything, confident detail, smoothness, accurate attack and airiness. This approach makes these headphones sound long-lasting and refined without sacrificing the important nuances of a recording.
- Sound Stage -
And the soundstage in Leteciel Shark is a spacious, well-organized and balanced acoustic picture. These headphones do not create the feeling of a very confined space, but instead offer a pleasant sense of air between all the instruments and sounds, allowing everything that happens in the music to clearly find and take its place.Leteciel Shark stage width is one of their strong points. There is no sense of shrinking sound here, but rather space gently opens up to the side.
Listening to these headphones, you can feel how music literally fills the space, especially when listening to complex and multi-layered tracks.
In terms of depth, Leteciel Shark offer a well-crafted sense of distance and perspective. Sound doesn't just “evenly” spill across the space, it's literally layered, giving you the sense that sound events are happening at different distances. Instruments closer to you sound more detailed, while those farther away have a slight spatial reverb effect, adding a sense of openness.
But a separate pleasure is the localization and separation of images. Leteciel Shark don't just place instruments in space, they do it precisely and accurately, without overlaps and losses. Vocals, guitars, synthesizers, reverbs - everything is separated from each other by a thin but distinct boundary, which is especially noticeable when listening to multi-layered or rich compositions.
And as a result, the soundstage in Leteciel Shark is a successful compromise between accuracy and musicality. It does not pretend to be an arena effect, but gives a sense of spaciousness, depth and liveliness, where every instrument knows its place and the listener gets a full sense of presence. It's a mature and balanced delivery that perfectly supports the character of the whole Shark sound: neat, confident, musical and natural.
- Leteciel Shark vs Leteciel Mira vs Leteciel Magiris -

Oh guys...comparing all three sets wasn't easy, I don't often do such huge comparisons, but I realized that I should definitely do it to make it much easier for you to choose the right headphones for you, I really spent a lot of time on it, but I can safely tell you that I got a clear picture of all three sets, and I'm ready to share it with you, as clear and to the point as possible, let's go!

- Low Frequencies -
Leteciel Mira: is a moderate bass not too deep or punchy. Suitable for those who are not looking for a powerful punch, but prefer lightness and emphasis on texture and airiness. Sub-bass is perceptible, but it is more marked than fully developed. The mid-bass is fast, without roundness - it gives rhythm, but doesn't over-pressurize.
Good for light genres, vocals, acoustic.
Leteciel Shark: here the bass is noticeably denser. It is not over-amplified, but has a more obvious mass, depth and roundness. The sub-bass penetrates the mix softly, the mid-bass gives a nice body and rhythmic support. The bass is versatile - there's enough weight and control.
Gives a solid feel without being overdriven. Maximum warm, musical foundation.
Leteciel Magiris: are the most bass-heavy in the trio. The sub-bass goes deep, and literally feels physical. The mid-bass is powerful, with high density, yet not smeared.
The pitch is massive, the bass foundation is the densest and most saturated.
Conclusion: Mira - lightness and neutrality, Shark - comfort and balance, Magiris - depth and mass.
- Mid Frequencies -
Leteciel Mira: The middle here is light, a bit airy, with a slight accent on the top end. The sound is transparent, detailed, with good readability of vocals and instruments. The pitch is at its most energetic, but not overly overpowering.
The character is a bit light and cheeky, with a bias towards analyticism and clarity.
Leteciel Shark: As far as I'm concerned one of the most pleasant and versatile mids. It is warm, smooth, neutral and moderately restrained. There are no surges in the upper mids, everything sounds soft, pleasant and balanced.
This is exactly the kind of sound that doesn't get tiring - it's delicate, calm, but lively.
Leteciel Magiris: serves the middle tighter and more fleshy. The lower middle is particularly prominent, which gives the sound mass and richness. In the upper mids it is a bit more energetic than in the Shark, but it doesn't go into excessive aggression, so the delivery is still quite smooth.
Gives more “meat” and body, good for male vocals and dense tracks.
Conclusion: Mira - emotions and clarity, Shark - warmth and comfort, Magiris - body and pressure.
- High Frequencies -
Leteciel Mira: the treble is more open, bright, but without excessive aggression. Extension is not bad, character is light. In some tracks a little light accent may appear, but the overall presentation is balanced.
For those who like more air and clarity.
Leteciel Shark: here the treble is slightly darkened, but very precise, soft and super comfortable. No harshness, no sibilants - everything sounds smooth, smooth and pleasant. Details are audible but don't bulge out.
Very delicate, versatile presentation.
Leteciel Magiris: here the treble is also darkened, but perhaps a little less refined than on the Shark. They are rather rounded, merged into the overall sound flow. A little more air and transparency, which will be appreciated by those who like to analyze music well.
Emphasized comfortable pitch, but with an emphasis on the overall body of the sound.
Conclusion: Mira - brightness and air, Shark - precision and smoothness, Magiris - softness and transparency with analytics.
- Sound Stage -
Leteciel Mira - the most airy and neat scene, with good width and clear panorama, but without deep three-dimensionality. Suitable for those who appreciate lightness and monitor presentation.
Leteciel Shark - is the golden mean the stage is voluminous, with excellent depth and enveloping effect. A versatile balance between intelligibility and atmospherics.
Leteciel Magiris - the largest and most corporeal scene. The space feels full - both in width and depth, creating the most intense and spectacular immersion.
My conclusion on this headphones!
Leteciel Shark is a headphone that boasts an exceptional balance of all frequencies. The bass provides a dense and textured foundation while not overpowering the sound. The midrange is smooth and neutral, without aggression, with excellent control of all details. The high frequencies, despite being slightly darkened, leave a great impression thanks to detail and maximum comfort.
These headphones are the golden mean between Leteciel Mira and Leteciel Magiris models. They are ideal for people who appreciate harmony, precision and musicality in all ranges. Without bright coloration or over-emphasizing any of the frequencies, Leteciel Shark offer a comfortable and engaging listening experience that is pleasant in any genre.
Buy Leteciel Shark on Penon Official Website: https://penonaudio.com/Leteciel-Shark.html
Buy Leteciel Magiris on Penon Official Website: https://penonaudio.com/Leteciel-Magiris.html
Buy Leteciel Mira on Penon Official Website: https://penonaudio.com/Leteciel-MIRA.html

Being a reviewer I try to give my subjective opinions on iems, in the hobby at the moment 95% of iems released at the moment are good so the differences between great iems and good iems is all about the nuances. All reviews are based on a single point in time for the reviewer next week an iem can come along and make a mockery of your previous judgement.
The Leteciel Shark at $109.90 is a triple Dynamic Driver in a surprisingly small shell with a beautiful sparkling blue faceplates.



I could do without the waifu box, plastic figures and Badge which for me would have made me think the iem inside was not a serious iem when in infact its a serious audiophile gem.



The Shark is challenging to be the new king of the castle when it comes to budget triple dynamic drivers iems and what’s most pleasing its neither Harmon or V shaped in its sound signature but rather a wonderfully balanced W. This is a case of hitting the perfect balance in tunning in a very comfortable shell.



In the current market there seems to be a new best iem released every week. The Shark enters the fray and surpasses my expectations with ease. Fantastic build quality, very nice cable available in 3.5mm, quality denim effect case and most important, brilliantly tuned quality drivers.




The Title of this review is “Triple Pleasure” why you may ask, well when I heard how this iem presented my entire music catalogue I was able to just kick back and enjoy the music the Shark just took everything in its stride confidently. The sound presented is warm, robust in body but not veiled the treble is extended but not peaky. If I was to choose an iem to be a gift to anyone outside the hobby this would be it.

I'd just like to say upfront I believe we are all biased when giving our subjective thoughts about IEMs be it a particular type of signature that works with our music library or how an IEM looks and feels in our ears. On the subject of ears everyone's ear anatomy is different and this effects fit and seal which in turn effects the perception of bass response so I recommend finding the right ear tips that suit your ears to get the best of any IEM.

My review star ratings are linked to the price range of the iem eg a 5 star review of a $100 iem is not equal to one of a $500 iem.

I’m and audio enthusiast with a collection of over 200 iems, 30 different sources with a music collection that numbers over 100,000 tracks and 15 flathead buds I share my impressions as a way to share my enthusiasm for the hobby I approach from the premise of music first technology 2nd, what does this mean? For me the technicalities are not of prime importance but does the music move with this particular iem.

I’m a connoisseur of many different sound signatures. The only prerequisite is musicality I’m not a fan of analytical cold playback. My scale of success when it comes to evaluating iems is; do I get goosebumps when they playback my favourite tunes. There are many good iems but do they give me goosebumps? Unfortunately I have a draw full of just good iems.

I want the iem that I reach for without thinking because I instinctively know it will bring the thrill I’m seeking from my music. The Shark’s bass, mids and sprinkling of treble coming from the three Dynamic Drivers gave me goosebumps with my most loved genre of classic rock which I believe to be the last bastion of instrumental authenticity just bands playing together in the studio with a sound engineer capturing the magic on tape! The Shark’s analogue signature matches just as perfectly with these types of recordings as with any others in my varied collection. I must mention I don’t listen to classical music so cant say how this is suited.



I have always favoured Dynamic Drivers for the tactility and organic natural playback they produce. The Shark’s Dynamic Drivers give good sub bass and great mid bass combining to give a really exciting bottom end that drives the music along. The mid bass doesn’t bleed much into the mids, just a hint of thickness to male vocals, they are silky smooth and are relatively neutral, with a nice sense of air and layering. There is detail and the timbre is just wonderfully natural with both male and female voices having a touch of added note weight presenting slightly forward. The treble is not prominent but it is there. The leading edge of cymbals are crisp and sound very natural. The upper range of the mids and lower treble do sound very effective especially when cutting through the warmth of the lower mids with singers in the higher registers. The whole sound being rendered with a balanced warmth that I was able to enjoy for 5 or 6 hours straight without any fatigue, these are supremely comfortable iems.

Now I know there are those who don’t believe in burn in of iems, all I’m going to say is, I burn in all my iems to be honest I noticed the bass opening up and the treble smoothed out at around 50 hours.

Here's a graph for those who like such things



Disclaimer
Penon was kind enough me a sample of the Leteciel Shark. I am not affiliated with Penon and of course was not asked for any copy checking before publishing, they are seeing this the same time as you. All pictures taken be me or sourced from the Penon website . ALL opinions shared in this review are my subjective thoughts.



Make sure to research any iem before you buy!

The Leteciel Shark are available for purchase from the Penon website see the non affiliated link below

https://penonaudio.com/Leteciel-Shark.html

This is what Leteciel have to say about the Shark



Leteciel Shark 3 Dynamic Driver 3DD Triple Dynamic Drivers 2Pin 0.78mm Audiophile In-ear Earphone IEM

Description

The design theme comes from the band
SHARK, composed of LETECIEL, CoCo and ViVi, is active on the stage of youth, interpreting their stories. These relaxed and lively youth melodies are the construction of our new earphones.

SHARK sound features
The sound of SHARK is balanced, the performance is comprehensive, good at performing Pop vocals, JPOP,ACG and other types of tracks. As its name suggests, SHARK has made special adaptations for the band category, focusing on the stage and the atmosphere of the scene, the sound is infectious, and it is unforgettable.

Quadratic element
LETECIEL has specially created SHARK themed badges, which come in a set of three, and you can randomly get one of them in the product packaging. 58mm tinplate badge, laminated/digitally printed, Dutch needle metal back cover.

Multicolor panel
The panel color of the SHARK is brilliant and psychedelic. With the change of light and observation angle, the panel shows a variety of colorful colors, creating a colorful and dazzling live atmosphere like live house stage lights.
It should be noted that the panel of the SHARK is completely hand-painted, and the panel of each earphone is slightly different.

Custom core, three-dynamic driver acoustic architecture
The SHARK use a three-dynamic driver acoustic architecture supported by two custom drivers, including a custom 10mm high-performance beryllium-plated dynamic driver and a custom double-dynamic coaxial driver. With the help of computer simulation technology, the internal structure, magnetic circuit, diaphragm and so on are further optimized and improved, bringing more excellent sound performance.

Comfortable to wear
The cavity of the SHARK is made of skin-friendly resin material, ergonomic in-ear design, light and comfortable to wear and not easy to slip at the same time, as far as possible to enhance the comfort of long-term wear.

Select accessories
The SHARK eartips, optional Junebarc's Ether eartips to enhance the energy and texture of the sound. The earphone cable is optional with 6N high purity oxygen-free copper earphone cable, which is soft, extremely low stethoscope effect, strong toughness and durable.

Specification
Brand: Leteciel
Model: Shark
Driver: 1 custom 10mm high performance Beryllium-plated dynamic driver + 2 custom coaxial dynamic driver
Sensitivity: 104dB SPL/mW
Impedance: 16ohm @1kHz
Frequency response: 20Hz-20KHz
Cable: 6N high-purity oxygen free copper cable
Connector: 2pin 0.78mm
Plug: 3.5mm
Cable length: 1.25m
The frequency graph for those who like to see such things



What do they sound like?

The Shark’s bass has sub-bass just its not the main focus it digs deep and has enought rumble to satisfy me the midbass has great snap and attack with good dynamics . The mids are at the forefront with a touch of warmth/thickness but still have some brightness without sounding thin the upper mids have enough bite to give guitars a pleasing aggressive presence. The treble is crisp but not sibilant or fatiguing, cymbals sound natural with a nice decay placed right where they should be not artificially forward. They manage to have a suprisingly wide staging while being bassy enough to make drums and bass guitar meaty. The impressive thing is these little wonders have great depth allowing for a far more realistic layering experience than expected at this level.

I want to really enjoy my music. Something that releases the full scope of what the artist created in the studio. The Shark does that with cohesion ensuring to there’s no jarring transitions between the frequency range. The SPhark is a slightly warm, lush signature, bass is textured, dynamic and layered. The mids are slightly warm and don’t colour the vocals there is a little extra body to males vocals, female are realistic and sweet with a natural timbre. The vocals are front and centre with instruments placed exactly where they should be showing depth to the stage with natural unforced width. The Shark’s dynamic drivers sound very coherent no trace of uneven timbre just everything working together as one.

What do I mean by unforced width? Some IEMs give an impression of super wide stage which sounds unnatural throwing instrument placement off. With the Shark the staging is reliant on the production of the music, if a song is intimate that’s how it is rendered if the song has wide deep and tall production values the Shark presents it that way which at this price point is rare.

The mids are natural and organic, with just enough edge to add excitement to vocals and guitars causing me to be drawn into the music, Pianos and Guitars are given a really even treatment with extra note weight sounding exactly as you would expect if you were in a concert hall.

The Transition from upper mids to lower treble is boosted slightly but still sibilance free, even with songs that have sibilance bult into the recording. The little bump in this region just edges them into excitement in this area. To be totally honest theShark is not very tip reliant I found with wide bore tips there was a more pleasing treble and a more open sound in general with narrow bore tips the whole signature became a bit warm and thickened up. I settled on large Divinis Velvet wide bore tips these gave me the perfect balance of warmth and treble extension, On the subject of tips while Leteciel give a generous selection of tips I couldn’t get a good seal with any of them, I have very big ear canals.

The timbre and tactility of drums, strings, guitars and brass instruments is very natural all instruments find their own place. Vocals both male and female are reproduced authentically with emotion, every inflection, intonation is apparent as a singer climbs the scale to the crescendo it is presented well cutting through, if a voice has gravel you feel it. The SP01 is quite forgiving of poorly produced music.

The sound signature as a whole is of natural slightly boosted bass with clear clean mids with a little edge in the treble, giving an overall satisfying feeling of immersion in the music

When I'm evaluating IEMs I have a play list of roughly 100 songs of mixed genres. With the Shark again, I found myself listening to songs rather than analysing the different frequency ranges listening to albums in their entirety just loosing myself in the music. I found they worked across all the genres in my library always smooth and velvety . I don’t listen to much EDM but the SP01 played the Lordes’s “Royals” well its real strength was with the subbass digging down deep and Lordes vocals cutting through with an expansive sense of space and layering.

a-ha - Take on me sounded wonderfully full and clean with the crisp drums and lush keyboards . Morten Harket’s soaring tenor vocals sounding full and sweet with no thinness the layering in this 80s classic synth-pop song was produced with expert precision a really enjoyable listen

Adele – Hello, this torch song classic with moody piano intro and breathy vocals reproduce with just enough warmth and weight to draw you in slowly building to the big glide up the vocal register to the masterful high notes Adele is famous for the Shark manages to keep up without any distortion infact they present the nuances in the notes being sung so effectively . The staging is also brilliantly reproduced increasing the atmospherics greatly.

Steely Dan's – Black Cow, one of the best produced albums in my opinion was played with a breathtaking expertise at this price range, drums, keyboards, vocals , hi-hats and cymbals were natural with excellent decay space and staging with good height, depth and width enabling me to pick out instruments in the mix, there was a little warmth in this song but it still felt open and airy with the layering of the instruments in a class above its price bracket very enjoyable.

Steven Tyler- My own worst enemy this is one starts with a sparce acoustic guitar and tambourine with Tylers gritty vocals and slowly builds with new instruments being introduced as this slow ballad builds Tylers elastic vocals stays front and centre as the song becomes a multilayered wall of sound the Shark manages to keep the huge production in control avoiding any congestion, impressive.

Led Zepplin – Since I’ve been loving you
The lead guitar intro is perfectly presented sweet and keening the drums with that slow heavy rhythm, then as the song builds, keyboards the cherry on the cake comes with Plants unmistakeable vocals reaching for the sky as the song builds in intensity to a cohesive whole with the wailing Plant cutting through like a hot knife in butter. The Shark excels presenting Zepplin vocals they are the star of the show never overpowered by the drums and guitar.

Steve Earle and the Dukes- The Hard Way
Crisp drumming introduces the song with piano and acoustic guitars as Steve Earles unmistakable vocals the production is big and airy with a solid bass flooring in the style of many Bruce Springsteen albums this can sound a bit dry on other lesser iems, here it sounds rich and smooth and layered. The layering is just astounding at this price point with each instrument being given enough space to be able to pick them out and follow them.

The Hu – This Mogul (with William DVall) –
The dynamics of this track are huge with drums guitars and Mongolian instruments, the Horsehead fiddle, Tovashuur, Tumar Khuur, Tsuurare and Mongol throat singing with a special guest William DuVall of Alice in Chains. The power of this dense, complex and rhythmic masterpiece is reproduced with accuracy and weight the driving rhythms are dynamic and punchy, I didn’t hear any congestion in the instrumentation despite the density of this track. The vocals of William DuVall stood out against the wall of instruments and were on point and unveiled just good headbanging fun. The Shark didn’t feel exposed with faster tracks with instruments in the same frequency range still being given space to be heard with little to no congestion.

The Shark is an easy to drive iem I had no issues using them with my phone, Daps, Dongles in getting loud enough, the dynamics and open sound was present with all sources the texture and layering they are capable of was available for all to some degree.

They sounded good with neutral or warm sources. This is an iem that doesn’t need a powerful source but it does scale impressively.

I'm not a fan of analytical sounding IEMs that force details into your ears like a photograph with HDR and sharpening set at max a decidedly digital representation. I'm more Vinyl on a turntable, Leica manual focus, sumptuous colours on kodak colour gold film, kinda guy, where if you look really close all the details are there but it's the whole image you appreciate rather than just how sharp it is.

Sources used:



IBasso dx170
Shanling H5
HiBy R6 111
HiBy R8
Sony ZX707
Sony nw-a55
Sony Xperia V
Penon tail dac /amp
Cayin N3 Ultra
Venture Electronics VE RunAbout RA 2B-FE 2BFE
FIIO M15

When using my different sources I didn’t favour the more powerful ones the extra dynamics and layering and technical presentation was apparent but the overall musical presentation was the same.

Comparison



Penon Serial

The Shark is the equivalent of the Penon Serial’s younger sibling whose just come of age vying for the same partners running track they might not be ready to win every race but they are coming really close 2nd.
That is to say the share more similarities than differences the Shark is smaller more comfortable the Serial has a bit more detail in the bass, I’m talking nuances here, a touch more extended in the treble but the mids are even Stevens. I would say differences are more in the personal tastes area rather than objectively better.

ARTTI R1
The Shark eats the ARTTI R1 for breakfast the R1 just can’t compete in any of the frequency ranges coming across as slightly harsh and hard edged in comparison to the Velvet smooth transitions the Shark has.



Conclusion
The around $100 range is full of great sounding iems with more released it seems on a weekly basis the Leteciel Shark more than competes it’s an exceptional iem that redefines what’s possible at this price and sets a new standard. It’s fun and exciting sound signature that lets your music flow effortlessly. The Shark is a reasonabley technical iem that plays more on its smooth musicality. Its ability to transport you into the realm of of Musical bliss . I fully recommend you check out the Leteciel Shark its my choice for around $100

Hello everyone! I'm happy to see you here again with another review. I’ve spent the last two weeks with the new IEMs from Leteciel, the Leteciel SHARK – IEMs with three dynamic drivers in each (3DD), priced at around $110. I got this opportunity courtesy of Penon Audio, and I’m very grateful to them for that!

Disclaimer​

As mentioned at the beginning, I received the IEMs from Penon Audio in exchange for my honest review, but still – my opinions about the IEMs are personal and written based on my own experience with them, and I was not paid for this review. Additionally, this review was translated from Hebrew using translations tools, if you wish to read the review in it's native language, you may do that at this following link.

What's in the box?​

Thanks for asking! Well, I’ve received a few requests mentioning the lack of an unboxing video for these IEMs. So, I listened to the requests, and here’s the pilot:


Did you like it? I'd love to hear your thoughts!

The unboxing experience is truly exceptional compared to what’s usually offered, especially in this price range. Even before opening the box, there’s a cute welcome surprise – an anime band that you can assemble and create a cute little band that can be placed on your desk or anywhere else you like. It’s a fun and quirky addition, especially for anime lovers (like me~).



Inside the box, you'll find a picture of the anime band featured on the packaging, a high-quality denim-style case, an anime pin, one type of silicone ear tips, and the IEMs themselves with the cable already attached—just take them out, plug them in, and enjoy. Personally, I would’ve liked to receive more types of silicone ear tips, but aside from that, the unboxing experience is very rich and unexpected for this price range, overall.




The cable of the IEMs very good. It is colored in black, the width of it is not particularly thick, and it is relatively flexible, but it does have a tiny bit of memory, though nothing that interferes with usage. Overall, I would say it’s quite comfortable. The ring around the cable split works great; it stays in place and is very easy to adjust, which is an area where many cables fall short, so I’m happy to see they did this right. The shape that curves around the ear is one of the most comfortable I’ve worn. The cable bends smoothly behind the ear without needing to adjust or pull it.

Honestly, it’s a great welcome, especially when the cable comes pre-attached to the IEM, so you don’t need to mess with it. And with an unboxing experience that leaves a smile on your face, great job.

Oh, and yes, there’s a right and left mark on the cable, but it’s not a big deal since the cable is already pre-attached to the IEM.



The carrying case that comes with the IEMs is very high quality. It's a bluish color with a denim texture. It’s rectangular, opens and closes with magnets, and is quite convenient for carrying, fitting into a pocket.

It reminds me of the case that comes with the ISN Audio NEO 3, which are IEMs that cost twice as much, so that’s a nice touch.
Quality, comfortable, compact. I would say, though, that at first, it’s a bit challenging to get used to its shape, since the IEMs are relatively large, so it takes a bit of practice. But once you get used to it, it’s comfortable.



When it comes to the silicone tips, I think this is where the package falls a bit short. There’s only one type of silicone tip included, and at first, when I started listening, I felt like something wasn’t quite right for my ear.
Yes, they were comfortable, but the sound didn’t feel like it was the best these IEMs could produce. After trying out some different silicone tips, I decided to stick with my beloved SpinFit CP100+ tips, and the sound improved dramatically.
However, everyone has different ears, and this might be a specific issue for me; but still, I would have liked to see a bit more variety in the silicone tips.
I would say, if you decide to buy these IEMs, get yourself some additional silicone tips so you can have the option to choose and see what works best for you (aka - tip rolling). It really makes a difference in both the sound and the overall experience, and significantly so! Don’t skip this part. Very important!!

Build Quality & Fit and Comfort​

The build of the IEMs is ergonomic, with a shape that fits relatively well to the human ear, making them very comfortable. The IEMs themselves are very beautiful, shiny, and glossy. They respond to light, so every time you move, they shine in a blue hue, which is quite cute and unique. Overall, I found them very comfortable to use, and combined with the comfortable cable they come with, the listening experience and comfort were excellent.

In Terms Of Sound​

Frequency response graph of the Leteciel SHARK from Squig (courtesy of Hu-Fi).

Apart from this review, I'm happy to announce that I have a measurement device for IEMs on the way, so soon I’ll be able to add my own measurements to my reviews and won’t have to rely on graphs from others. Thought that might be interesting . The tuning of the IEMs feels somewhat bass-focused, with enough sub and mid-bass to give body to the vocals, which are not so upfront but still very present, and at the same time, they’re not the warmest IEMs I’ve heard; maybe more "warmish".

Sub-Bass​

The sub-bass, which covers the lowest frequencies and often delivers the rumbling sensation rather than distinct sounds.

The sub-bass in these headphones is well felt. It can go deep, but in a way that isn't excessive. It feels quite high-quality, sitting in the background, ready to do its job. It's not the deepest sub-bass I've ever heard, but there's a nice balance with the other frequencies, which allows it to blend well into the overall sound. To be more specific, it's well felt and delivers a very good performance, but it doesn't steal the show from the other frequencies. Instead, it adds flavor and color to the music without taking over. When needed, it's very present, but as mentioned, it doesn't hinder the other frequencies from shining.

Mid-Bass​

The mid-bass, where the bass becomes more distinct and perceptible, is equally well-executed. In this range, you hear kick drums and some male bass vocals more clearly.

The mid-bass receives more emphasis and presence compared to the sub-bass. It feels full, with instruments like drums getting body, piano key presses feeling lively and deep, and guitars sounding more "acoustic," especially bass guitars. It's a very enjoyable experience. Male voices also get body and presence, feeling full. Despite the focus on the mid-bass, I wouldn't call these headphones particularly "warm," probably due to the good contrast from the higher frequencies. Overall, I think the bass in these headphones is excellent. It's rich, high-quality, and well-crafted. In metal tracks with lots of bass, as well as rock, the headphones managed to play the bass fast enough to satisfy. I don't think they can disappoint anyone, and I say this as someone who loves a lot of bass.

I think the headphones' character is somewhat "band-like," and you definitely get that vibe, both in the unboxing and the tuning. The drums, especially, feel alive in these headphones, with the nuances being very noticeable and a great performance from them.

I'd also like to mention the guitars. I noted they sound "acoustic," and this is really felt. The guitars have body, texture, and every strum gets a warm, pleasant touch. It's a very enjoyable experience, and these IEMs know how to deliver this very well. I was quite impressed!

Mids​

The mids are the home to most instruments and vocals.

In terms of midrange frequencies, the IEMs also manage to perform well. Guitars sound excellent, violins sound full, and both male and female voices sound great equally. They are relatively forward, but not excessively so. I feel like each instrument receives a nice level of attention, and the combination of low frequencies and midrange brings a lot of life to the mix, making it a very enjoyable experience. The IEMs excelled in pop songs, the way they played male and female vocals was wonderful, combined with instruments that sound full.

Listening to concerts was also a very enjoyable experience; for example, listening to the tracklist of Wicked was very immersive. Every vocal received good attention, and their positioning was precise, with great bass support.

Additionally, the album Tales Weaver Exceed by Vanilla Mood, which is composed entirely of instrumental music (highly recommended!), sounded really beautiful, and gave me the feeling of being in the concert itself. The instruments were well-positioned, felt full, and each one received individual attention. Overall, I think the midrange frequencies were done well and tastefully. I thoroughly enjoyed the amazing combination of bass and midrange. Great job, Leteciel!!

Treble​

The treble, which captures high-pitched sounds like cymbals, violins, and higher synthetic tones, adds brightness, sharpness, and sparkle to the music. However, excessive treble can lead to harshness or fatigue.

The treble in the IEMs provides enough contrast to the bass, but anyone looking for a lot of treble might not find it here. This is what gives these IEMs a more "intimate" feel, with a focus on vocals and other frequencies. The treble is there to balance, but it doesn’t get as much attention as the bass and midrange. I find this fitting for the tuning that Leteciel chose to go with, and it blends very well. Nuances like guitar plucks, cymbals, and so on sound excellent; they integrate nicely with the instruments.

Overall, I think Leteciel did a good job with the treble in the IEMs. It’s present, not the most prominent, provides excellent contrast to the bass, and still doesn’t tire or become harsh on the ears. I’d say the main focus in these IEMs is the bass, at least based on my experience. Again, it’s not that there’s no treble, there’s enough of it, and it’s enough to make me happy. But for electronic music, I don’t think this would be my first choice. These IEMs are more suited for songs with vocals and instruments, but less so for electronic. That said, I did enjoy listening to electronic music with them, and they delivered a good performance, but they wouldn’t be my first pick for the genre.

Technical Capabilities​

The technical capabilities of these IEMs are nothing short of impressive. The soundstage feels quite wide, with instruments having room to breathe and shine. Separation capabilities are pretty good for the price range. But the imaging... wow! That was the first thing I noticed about these IEMs. The combination of a fairly wide soundstage and great imaging makes these IEMs stand out in the technical department, especially for the price range they compete in, in my opinion. Detail retrieval is also quite good, with nuances in the midrange and low frequencies receiving great attention. Overall, excellent technical performance, especially considering the price that Leteciel is asking for. I really enjoyed them.

Comparisons​

Letshuoer S12 (Full review here)​

The Letshuoer S12 are in-ear monitors with a single planar magnetic driver. I’d say the comparison between them is quite interesting; the S12 offers a brighter tuning, with less emphasis on bass, and more focus on mids and treble. Meanwhile, the Leteciel SHARK feel a bit warmer, less treble-focused, and give more attention to the mids and nuances in the lower frequencies. In terms of technical abilities, I’d say they are on the same level, which is amazing in my opinion. The imaging on both is very good, and the soundstage feels wide. When choosing between the two, I would lean more towards the type of music I listen to, as each has its strengths and weaknesses. For electronic music, I’d prefer the S12, but for pop music or music that primarily features instruments, I’d prefer the Leteciel SHARK. In terms of build quality, the S12 are made of metal and are relatively small, so they don’t fully cover the ear, requiring a good seal to block out external noise. The Leteciel SHARK, on the other hand, provide better passive isolation and have a shape that fits the human ear more comfortably. To sum up: the Leteciel SHARK focuses more on the lower frequencies and midrange, while the S12 are brighter, with more emphasis on the high frequencies.

Sliivo SL41 mk2 (Full review here)​

The Sliivo SL41 mk2 are hybrid IEMs combining a dynamic driver (DD) with 4 balanced armature drivers (BA). Honestly, just like the S12 were an interesting comparison, this one is also relatively interesting. I would describe the Sliivo (allow me to shorten it and use this name, please ) as more neutral IEMs with boosted bass, and a bit more brightness (although there's great sub-bass enhancement), while the Leteciel SHARK are warmer IEMs with a focus on the nuances in the lower frequencies. I would say the comparison is relatively similar to that of the S12, except for the technical performance. From my feeling, the soundstage of the Leteciel SHARK feels wider, and the imaging is better compared to the Sliivo. In terms of comfort, I found the Leteciel SHARK more comfortable to wear than the Sliivo, because of their more ergonomic shape, while the Sliivo has a relatively flat shape. To sum up: the Leteciel SHARK are IEMs with a wider soundstage and better imaging, focusing on the nuances in the lower frequencies, while the Sliivo are neutral IEMs with a bass boost and are a bit more treble-heavy than the Leteciel SHARK.

Bottom Line​

The Leteciel SHARK are serious contenders in their price range. They offer a very satisfying package of accessories that left a smile on my face and gave a nice vibe, as if the box is inviting me to listen to the tracks. The IEMs themselves are very beautiful, with a shiny and glamorous structure, looking almost like a luxury, sparkling piece of jewelry, the kind that draws attention and invites you to listen. There’s no way you'd want to leave them just lying on a table or not admire their beauty.
Beyond that, the listening experience is relatively intimate and calm, with satisfying bass, a lovely focus on the low-end nuances of musical instruments. The packaging really reflects the vibe of the IEMs, with great emphasis on drums, guitars, cello, pianos, and violins. The bass plays a great role here, giving substance, foundation, depth, and shape to each instrument. For pop music, concerts, and solo instrumental pieces, they’re definitely my first choice.
And at their price? Good luck competing with that. Their technical abilities left me speechless, the soundstage is wide, and the imaging capabilities are nothing short of excellent.
The only downside for me was that the silicon tips that came with them didn’t fit my ears, so I switched to SpinFit CP100+. So, if you feel the same way I did and think something's missing, I’d recommend first trying to swap out the tips and see if it improves the sound. For me, after changing the silicon tips, the sound improved dramatically. But that’s a personal issue, and everyone has different preferences. In general, with any IEM, it’s always worth trying many types of tips to find the one that provides the best seal and comfort. It’s worth buying several types and styles and giving each IEM the tip that suits it best.
Overall, I think Leteciel has thrown a tough competitor into the ring in this price range. If they keep it up, I see a bright future for them in the market. These IEMs definitely earn my recommendation!

The Leteciel SHARK are available for purchase from Penon Audio's store via the following link (no affiliate marketing) for around 109.90$.

Thank you for reading, hope to see you in my next reviews~!

Leteciel Shark 3 Dynamic Driver Universal IEM
Redcarmoose Labs December 18th, 2024
$109.90
https://penonaudio.com/Leteciel-Shark

Specification
Brand: Leteciel
Model: Shark
Driver: 1 custom 10mm high performance Beryllium-plated dynamic driver + 2 custom coaxial dynamic driver
Sensitivity: 104dB SPL/mW
Impedance: 16ohm @1kHz
Frequency response: 20Hz-20KHz
Cable: 6N high-purity oxygen free copper cable
Connector: 2pin 0.78mm
Plug: 3.5mm
Cable length: 1.25m
Package
Leteciel Shark
Carry case
SHARK themed badges
3 pairs of silicone Ear-tips


The SHARK!
What can I say, the SHARK became way more musical after a week of burn-in. I’m placing this sentence at the very start of the review, just in case you get the SHARK and are simply OK with it at the start, more is to come! So often I’m surprised by this change, then I remember “OH” 3DDs……not 1 or 2. And the fact that those DDs are in-charge of everything. So my suggestion is just do it no matter what……….just do it!

This musicality is (now) in every nook and cranny of playback. Meaning there was an effortlessness that prevailed above and beyond everything. A set of decays that are real and decaying. An extra thickness that was added to all three……..the treble, midrange and bass frequencies. An added density and added realness that was unarguable. Why am I posting this as the opening paragraph of the SHARK review? The question really should be, how could I not include this change, as that is why we are here………to experience music playback that is of an advanced quality in comparison to even two years ago. Yep, the SHARK is that and more. OK, ok lets start with what’s in the box and a little history, then I will get to the side-by-sides. Side-by-sides? So soon………..we I’m curious as to how the SHARK compares against its other family members.


The box:
The opening experience seems to be on-par with IEMs in this price-range. But, what is cool is just how the SHARK looks in person. Yep, just holding it in your hands, I know it is superficial yet this look is exciting and fun………It simply looks like more than $109.90? Then you get the additional gear……like a blue-jean case, a great set of ear-tips and the strange figurines?



These girls are representing a three piece all girl band. They are also representing the frequency range of the three drivers. Now you would think that three drivers would arrange the music into a separated fashion, like the members of a band each with their own portion of the overall sound? Yet in reality the sound is totally blended, and I don’t know how this is done, except that it happens, to where you would guess you could tell where one driver ends in response, then another takes over………but probably due to each driver being a DD, you can’t tell, it sounds like one placement of playback? Now really it makes you wonder (if you're like me) why they feel they would (feel the need) to include all this extra stand-up plastic with the SHARK?




And that’s the thing. Before burn-in and when you first get the box, you guess they are providing all this stuff to somehow make-up for a lack in sound ability? That they have to buy your love, so to speak. I mean I’m not into the extras, but also I realize I’m older than the intended SHARK buyer. And I accept that there could be fans out there that hold value in these extras……..like the refraction pin, and the plastic girls as entertaining. That this sound is so good………….that all these extras are just that………extras in the end.

Ear-tips:
These special ear-tips are included not only with the single full-rage $54.90 Leteciel MIRA, but also come with the $159.00 Leteciel Magiris Hybrid IEM. As such the ear-tips are known as “Ether” ear-tips. And yes, if you are guessing they are the throw away style that come with many of the major brand IEMs, you would guess wrong, these are fully usable and great fitting plus relatively thick, and stout. The set included 3 pairs of small, medium and large.

The case:
One of the nicest cases I have gotten all year. Why? Well it is real blue jean material, that darker blue style that comes with white stitching. The liner is all velvet, black velvet. The case has a metal chrome name plate and magnetic closure. The case is not too small or too large and really seems to work, while the jean material seems to add to the ability to hold on to it?

The cable:
I’m not a big fan of this cable, but only due to (it not accessing) the 4.4mm amplifier output from my players. In fact the actual cable is super nice if you leave that one point out of the metrics.

Meaning the 6N 2Pin 0.78mm cable is extremely ergonomic and soft to use. The whole set-up is all aluminum, the plug (which is branded) then the ball of the chin-cinch is aluminum, the splitter is aluminum and the 2Pins are aluminum barrels with both R and L markers and color coded clear and red. Now the cable is not quite the level of the crazy flexibility of the $159.00 Leteciel Magiris, but I have never seen a more flexible cable than the Magiris has? So each IEM of the Leteciel line has a different type of cable, more on the Magiris cable to follow in the Magiris review.


Comparisons:
Look, I was curious OK……….meaning sure these three IEMs are made by the same company, and share a (from memory) tuning of sorts, separated (maybe) by build methodology. Meaning I’m guessing before the tests that each IEM is responding differently due to the Mira being a single full-range DD, the Magiris being a two driver Knowles BA and DD, and SHARK as a 3X DD. So just by build nature we are gifted with an exploration into the various driver character subjects due to make and design. Like having a few different breeds of dog, each will showcase their nature and personality profile.


Left to right:
Leteciel SHARK, Leteciel Mira and Leteciel Magiris

The Mira:
While my first introduction to the line, I found the overall tone to offer balance, the slightly compromised bass ability added to the 2.5kHz to 5kHz peak Pinna Gain, resulted in a more floaty midrange. This floating was the perfect idea of personality too as it added fast transients and well positioned vocals! Sure there are a number of ways to build a 10mm full-range DD, and this is one. As such the Mira is exactly like her name, feminine and poised, female in nature and special, almost cute? Did I just call an IEM cute? Well I almost did. And now we are going-up against the SHARK, maybe the name of an all girl group? Yes, SHARK the perfect name for an all girl group, or an all DD X 3 IEM. I’m actually surprised this name has not been taken yet?

All tests with the Penon Pyramid VI and the new Penon PAC LStips................included is the WM1A Walkman with MrWalkman’s firmware and zero EQ.

I’m having so much fun here. And before this test I did an hour of cable tests. What this does is show me the character and limits of that specific character in regards to the ramifications of different cable material. The only reason I’m talking about it here is I’m not going to include cable rolls in this review. Why? The character of the SHARK is well rounded and the most well rounded than any on test here today. The SHARK remained itself, while still allowing for a window of character to be met-up-with…………..still that character was ultimately the SHARK itself, and that could be looked at as both good and bad. Good because that means the SHARK is pretty much itself from a number of sources and cables, remaining in character with no fires to put out, or changes to be asked for.

HAHA,
How often do I introduce a paragraph with “HAHA”. That is because I’m surprised, I’m surprised by how much brighter this is in the end. Yep, the Mira is actually more on the bright side, way way brighter than from my memory. And there is nothing wrong with memory being off. You see the SHARK was not in possession when I did the MIRA review. So that is how memory is…….it is faulty. Less bass, more midrange and a thinner treble. This MIRA is almost as if all the thick wind was taken out of the SHARK’s sails. To where my description of the Mira at the top of these comparisons is correct, but take every word and add 2X in-front! In defense of the MIRA I will say that this phenomenon is also the contrasts of being, meaning if you listened to the Mira for a day and only her for a day, she would start to become a little more balanced. But still, it is what it is………and everything I said about the floaty-ness held inside the Mira personality is there…….vividly there, and for some this will be the preferred way to go, only it IS different. The difference allows for sheets of treble additives to flow outwards into the stage, proclaiming their thinner nature, and holding charm, but of less real consequence. I mean all this has to be taken into cost too, as for the money the MIRA is grand, it is just that the $54.90 MIRA only walks so far into realism, to where today and right now, I am surprised at just how much better the SHARK is for basically 2X the jack.

OK, fun and games are over……….now we go up against the $159.00 Leteciel Magiris:

So I haven’t done the Magiris review yet. Right off we are greeted by this authoritative stage and personality of the Magiris. Way, way more authority than only two drivers would have you guess. And that’s my mental hang-up at times. I come from a time when less drivers normally meant less sound, but I would have anyone, just anyone into the hobby to hear the Magiris and tell me how many drivers it is, without knowing beforehand.

There is a giant-ness, a full-ness and a completeness that will make writing the Magiris review so much fun. The only reason I didn’t write the Magiris review already is because there already is a Magiris review posted, yet no SHARK reviews posted as yet.

Yet here all-of-a-sudden is a challenge to the SHARKS stage size? And a full on destruction of what was thought about the MIRA stage…….jeez. Yep, it is all here, all of it………..a classic big breakfast for the eating. But to get down to it, to try and itemize the style the Magiris brings to the breakfast table……………………Where the SHARK held finite, actually infinite decays, we are now witnessing faster decays and of a slight, very slight different timbre. I mean this is Knowles in action, and Leteciel paid more money for this driver. And you are paying for this timbre if you buy the Magiris. To where the overall signature is vibrant, more vibrant than the SHARK ever could grab onto. And those reaches of imaging are held into place of a slight bit thinner nature, but faster and clearer, living out and about into their own life, apart from what the SHARK is capable of. Still this is also the airiness of the MIRA, but on a way better side of airy, and today I would call this airy perfect, where I didn’t hear the Mira as perfect, if that makes any sense? Still here is a clean house, a sparkling floor free of clutter or debris. Sparkling and emotional, while still not perfect, but as big and grand as you can probably find in IEM land for the money?

Wait what:
I’m surprised they keep sending me gear, I’m totally unreliable. Putting the SHARK into my ears again, I am bewildered by the size of it all. I mean this is supposed to be a factual review. Yet now the size of the SHARK stage is somehow even bigger. I’m not going to erase what I wrote because that was my impression. But now coming back to the SHARK I have to give it more credit for stage size? Wild? And while it is more filled in in nature. Where the Magiris was the thin pole vaulter, this SHARK is the high school wrestler. Thicker and holding a demeanor of size and weight at hand. Slightly darker, but only darker in a good way, you know, that way you want. Basically all the thicker pluses and none of the thicker minuses. And while I can hear how they are from the same company, that there is a basic tuning idea here, still the three are so very different that having the Magiris and the SHARK would be complementary in nature. Why, well the SHARK has a filled-in way about how it generates a giant stage holding huge images, of midrange and treble, that while the bass takes a little back seat area, it is still fully accounted for and the SHARK still goes fine with EDM and Hop-hip.

What we are given is size with the SHARK. Crazy unarguable size of stage, and while I know this……..already, it was the Magiris that in contrast made the extra benefits of adding forward and back, top to bottom size image differences apparent? It is just that the Magiris is doing a more steely and faster imaging outwards to the right and left. To where the SHARK is adding bigger size into the midrange holding a midrange authority that is not only of different timbre than the Magiris, but of a thicker sculpturing. This sculpture holds detail, and more detail that you would guess reading this, it is just that images are overlapped and of a closer distance forward and back, and not as delineated and the Magiris could get to. Still when the vocals come here……………..OH Gawd.

OH Gawd:
Yep, there is a profound idea here with vocals. And if I was to give a basket of flowers to the Leteciel company, the basket would have a card……………….and the card would say simply……….Thank-you for the vocals………Redcarmoose. Yep that is all it would say. And not that the other items of replay are lacking. It is just these vocals make my day!

Vocals:
Big, harmonically rich, textured and itemized into the stage!

Treble:
Interestingly the treble is blended, and I’m not hearing an extra DD driver. What this does is puts the MIRA to shame a little, as the size is bigger and the stage is wider, to create this treble experience that is simply more involving, but more than that, I hate to say it, but there is still a slight floaty quality to the images, though they are grounded in the best of ways………fully outdoing whatever the MIRA was doing. Yep, the SHARK is basking in a more complete and less thin area especially in how the treble is presented. When you add the bass experience to it, this balance is profound. Meaning there is the perfect balance of bass to treble……………..I don’t know how else to say it. But what that balance does is make way for the mids………………..

Mids:
To where the mids are what Leteciel is all about. Not only in size but in careful clarity. You get the impression that there is nothing left out here. The best part is how they dialed in the vocals…………….to where the vocals are represented like a vocal IEM, only we are also given the rest of the supporting tones. Where sure this is not the BA vocals of the Magiris, but in many ways and for maybe some people this way of doing the mids would be unquestionably preferred. Simply warmer, with better decays and possibly better timbre? It is just their placement into the stage is grand, and smooth and realistic………..I’m out of words.

Bass:
This bass is arguable. That while maybe some could want more bass, I have to say it is close to perfect for me. Why? It has definition, but is not the very most clear bass, only for this style of money it is damn good. The decays are cool, that whatever it is lacking in texture the bass goes forward to get the involvement to your ears with decays. But the second more important thing is the blend. Yep, the bass is more blended here than you may get with traditional Hybrids? Yet when you turn-on EDM I ask you………do you even want more? That’s how the bass is! Firm clear and present…….hello. Hello!

And that fact maybe goes without saying, that this style of tune is (while holding a great stage) still more filled-in than BA/DD Hybrids can do. That when the treble comes about it is generated as a golden example of the tone, not needing or even trying to get that full-on sparkle. That all this is happening more with the midrange, and generally acceptable in that we are gifted with a glorious midrange after all is said and done. A thicker darker yet luscious midrange you want to tell people about.

Decays:
Come-on it is the decay that is this IEMs speciality. Putting to shame any BA Hybrids out there. These decays are everywhere you look, as this is a decay party!

Texture:
To where sure other IEMs can and will showcase more texture, found inside of how they generate tones of images. To where the SHARK is a more blended example while still holding better timbre, the texture could be called downplayed? Now what that means is the textures are still there, but slightly hidden beneath the mirk and mire of the composite display. More of a dense table of goods to try and take apart to examine. Yet inside of that matrix we are rewarded with this smooth realization of actual images (holding texture) coming forth and gaining noticeability.

Transients:
Sure, you don’t have that squeaky clean floor to arrange the transient ability. They are taking place, yet in a different time domain. Slower, more blended.......and yet more analog.

Tone:
Really the standout feature here is the tone, to where timbre and close to perfect tonality is the reason you buy these. The separation takes a hit due to a blending of how each instrument and vocals find their place in the mix, but that naturalness is why we came to visit. So as far as siding to the technicalities, BAs do a faster and more delineated, separated imaging attack, to where there is a faster creation and faster decay, that is not without its drawbacks. Here the physical structure of the DD membrane is of a slower reactionary incident in comparison to the microscopic movements of the BA reed of steel. Yet what comes out the other side is a more well rounded structure, containing the ability to go with any source and cable.



Build:
Notice the 3D form factor utilizing the ear-shape database for universal custom creation. This means the SHARK blends with your ears, into creating both a snug fitment, but also great noise occlusion. Listening to the fan sound I would call this noise occlusion medium, that while I have heard better, I have also heard worse. The single small vent seems smaller than most, though it does its job. The benefit here is the metal nozzle ends which hold ear-tips on without issue. Also the hand painted faceplates go the extra mile to add pizzazz to your daily life. The SHARK is just fun to look at, how else can I describe it?

Music:

Intro into the music section.
Some may question why I didn’t choose a wide range of music. Well to defend myself here, the SHARK plays it all. Once that is discovered then you try and trip it up a little. Meaning let’s investigate just how it attempts to replay such examples of well recorded music.

OH, and yes the lesser examples (of lesser files) you have been avoiding in your library……………gets lovely replay here too!

Just take my word on that, I don’t need to prove it. And if I was defensive I could list a whole list of lesser examples of tunes to show how the SHARK simply gets down to business with sub-par recordings. But that will slow down the review and add unneeded focus. What we are going to try and do is trip the SHARK up with even well-recorded music…………..and explain where we are at.


Note timestamps only pertain to the digital file, not the video.

Hans Zimmer
Wonder Woman 1984 (sketches)
No Hero Is Born From Lies
44.1kHz - 24bit
This is an important song in that this particular song is what BA-Hybrids do well. This taking of itemized sonics and separating them into fully isolated form………free into their own life of existence for you to relish. No, we don't have that exactly.

The first thing, that is the first thing you notice is how much bass there is. Listen this has been questioned here, and I will be the very first to defend that this is enough bass. And not enough bass but the perfect amount of bass. No it is not as low or even as itemized as some sets, and there are points deducted for clarity of separation. There are other lesser priced sets that do this bass in the opening better, just clearer and more separated. Still I don’t want that to detract from the extra added bass notes found in a romantic and pleasurable way found in the very place as those other IEM more itemized form, it is just this here is still coming up with detail, only it is more poetic in nature and is just as complete, in many ways it is just we have a more blended experience, and if you were looking for bass details added extra, other sets can do it, even for less money. Yet what this is about is a more cohesive and (maybe) overly coherent idea as to playback. The chime at 00:01 comes-up in attached to the rest, then the violins at 00:01 also showcase a more closer to the other instrument character. As such detail fanatics look elsewhere, this is about organic fun taking place. Everything is slightly furry around the edges and even touching. But at the same time there is an uncanny closeness that is golden allowing for this oneness of it all allowing for a blending and a more relaxed idea of playback. At 00:18 the timpani (kettle drum) is coming in from behind the strings…….almost as if a part of the whole, and not containing that edge, that strict edge of attack. That edge may be there, only it is clouded by its surroundings!

I mean this may sound silly, especially to audiophiles, but there is more to playback than the cutting edge of timpani attacks. What do you get in trade here? A romantic illustration of occurrences, it may sound like things are buried at first. Except when the higher toned strings start to make themselves known…………at 00:14 you start to get a clue to which part of town we are entering. Then, then right after that the kettle drums take on an effortlessness that is unquestionable and fun. You can taste the effortlessness….it is the thing of value here. At 00:28 the stage starts to enlarge, and the SHARK is taking us with it! At 00:32 the timpani is larger and we are aware of that fact. Again it is small nuances of volume due to the effortlessness that are taking us away emotionally. At 00:39 is the first major climax and yet the tones are not too bright, nor too dull. Around 00:49 we hear the chimes, and while not totally metallic sounding they are represented well. And that is the review in a nut-shell that while the chimes are there and not over-the-top metallic sounding, they are still fully heard for their own style of tone………..and it is correct. And right after this section somehow each and every element of the song comes into play, to where each tone is fully separated into the stage……….better than expectations and that is the thrill. At 01:12 there is another addition of extra violins. At 01:48 there are more chimes, yet they are closer to the rest of replay and not projected outward into their own existence like with BA sets. Still this slightly more cohesive replay is different and just as satisfying to hear, yet of darker and smoother tones. But fuller and more meaty than the Leteciel Mira ever thought of being. At 02:02 we now hear the pitter patts of stick-hits, and yet they are out on their own into the stage. All this could read like it borders on boring, and that is the question. But to me it is the best part about how Leteciel has walked that line. This line offers a fully complete and correct way to view your files, it is just there will always be more detail presented by BA driver IEMs that are tuned to offer a more bright idea of playback. The downside is those BAs can’t reach the full amount of decays, they just can’t get close. These decays are a flowing stream that waver inside of giant washes and like a slow moving river that comes-up to touch your feet, as an example of delight. This effortlessness is everywhere, in every instrument introduced, you can’t escape it. At 03:00 there is a change-up to where the song takes a quiet moment to add emphasis later. And even though there are decays into how the chimes are heard romantically introduced………just because and only because I have heard this other ways I’m fully aware it is not complete, yet I don’t care. Like at a restaurant getting a nice chunk of steak and forgetting that it does not include vegetables.


Note timestamps only pertain to the digital file, not the video.



Hans Zimmer & Junkie XL
Batman v Superman OST
New Rules
96kHz - 24bit
I have used this song for years and years to understand playback. And if I can say one important thing right off, timbre is correct. And (lol) the giant timpani came aboard. I mean if you really want to know the size of the timpani make this song at the start and subsequently make the use of the SHARK to be found not only respectful, but more importantly fun! The giant decays found inside them, and their slight lumbering pace, there is absolutely no way we could handle more low-end and keep this clear. There is a synth sound effect at just 00:48 that is like a flying bee, only darker and thicker. It is these ideas that make the SHARK precious and loved, that this tone somehow has great transients and crosses the stage from actually starting at 00:44! Then making itself known, ending at about 00:54. The synth that is a warm layer introduced as a wash of deep bass takes the cake here, being both warm and deep sounding fully itemized into the stage…….almost floating on its own. And that again is the value here, that it is rare for an IEM at this price point to deliver the goods, offered up in such a fine way! At 01:38 my test tone is upon us. This is a drop that I always use to get an understanding of both bass tone, and bass technicalities. That while maybe not as totally detailed as a BA bass could do, we are gifted with way enough tone to the bass and a great separation found into the stage!

KMFDM
Oh My Goth
Paradise
44.1Khz - 24bit
Here is a choice to show the range of female vocals. Yet more than that, this is a song I have used for years too. Hearing it…....the song reminds me of a very important feature that I may have left out of today's ideas. So besides vocals which I will get to, this song deals with pace. Pace and bounce are the most important things if you listen to rock. Yep, the SHARK has a groove. Now that maybe why there is not a picture of a set of gals playing orchestral music on the box? We are shown a girl rock band, and that is exactly what we have in our ears…….a rocking set! To start out with that means that there is a connection between the bass and the drums………a connection way more important than individual details………..why it is the most important aspect here?

A bounce and a play of rhythm that at times we don’t even know how it is provided, except we know when it is missing. This swagger is what enables us to move, and to dance, and to engage in the message that is beyond lyrics into the soul of the music. It is the message in rock music, heck at times people don’t even know the lyrics. Why, because lyrics are secondary to where the music takes us with a beat. This beat is arrived at by a number of devices, the bass must be enough, but not so much that it drowns out pace. There must be enough detail to where subtle differences in groove can be discerned. And with this usually comes a playful bounce that is taken by the guitar, the drums and the bass interacting.

Each instrument must allow for each other to be heard and felt. On top of that can be the focus of vocals. This vocal presence must be into how the Pinna Gain is perceived, because if not enough………..the vocals will not hold enough contrast to be focused upon, and sound almost like an afterthought, when we don’t ever want that. Here while maybe the SHARK could be a vocal IEM when Vocal music is used, in this case the Vocals need to pitch themselves out into position to be well heard inside this mix, and it is provided for.

The end results are at times difficult to describe, as really you want to hear everything, but at the same time ignore the very reasons for this success, and that is what we have. A simple yet complete groove to where the bass, drums guitar and vocals are heard intermingling.


Note timestamps only pertain to the digital file, not the video.

Adrift shipwrecked a siren hard to catch
Once caught, no turning back
My heart's a tomb painted black
Agony to endure hurts so good
You want more a blessing or a curse
I'm your devil doll for better or worse
Sing me sing your tragic love song
Don't be afraid come right in
I've been dying to meet you in the skin
Sing me sing your tragic love song
Let's make a pact play pretend
Eternally your invisible friend
Turn turn turn around when you see me coming
I'm the queen of Hell and I burn for you
Burn burn burn
The riddle goes on and on like a juke box
Repeating songs ambushed by the living dead
A nightmare with no end
Sing me sing your tragic love song
Don't be afraid come right in
I've been dying to meet you in the skin
Sing me sing your tragic love song
Let's make a pact play pretend
Eternally your invisible friend
Turn turn turn around when you see me coming
I'm the queen of Hell and I burn for you
Burn burn burn
Sing me sing your tragic love song
Don't be afraid come right in
I've been dying to meet you in the skin
I'm the queen of Hell and I burn for you
I'm the queen of Hell and I burn for you
Let's make a pact play pretend
Eternally your invisible friend
Turn turn turn around when you see me coming
I'm the queen of Hell and I burn for you
Burn burn, aah
I'm the queen of Hell and I burn for you
I'm the queen of Hell and I burn for you
I'm the queen of Hell and I burn for you




Conclusion:
The planets aligned with this one. To where the 3X DD drivers add extra stage and tonal ability only wished for by single full-range drivers. And that is what you think to yourself when the SHARK has burn-in and is placed into your ears. There is a lot of entertainment to be found at very little $ expenditure here. To where Leteciel went the extra mile to include qualities that beat-out more expensive Hybrid examples!

While maybe transients take a back seat to tonality………….imaging is still relatively exciting, and why we came in the first place. What I mean by that is that imaging is directly connected to transients.Yet the SHARK seems to go forward and substantiate imaging still, like moving against the tried and true ideas………..to create a big wonderful stage anyway? Yep, it is big and natural sound formations created inside of what the SHARK does 24/7………with every set-up you have.

And you get the plastic girl band to place wherever you want!

All and all………..to be serious here, Leteciel went the extra mile to provide a nice case, a nice cable and a nice set of ear-tips. Yet more important a nice sound that is going to be way way better than you possibly can guess for $109.90? Yep, it is the sound quality for money spent that will make your day when the Shark arrives and has burn-in at your home. The tone walks that line that designates enough detail, enough pace and enough stage to make your music come alive. The SHARK is so well rounded it plays every genre possible. It also walks that line to where extra detailed quality files sound great, and the SHARK can make the best of lesser old favorites you may have avoided...........to put on.

And as you know making bad files sound good is no easy feat to do, but the SHARK does it.

I said it before, but I need to say it again…………….the SHARK put-out a lot of sound for the asking price. It is just forward and big, and to the left and to the right. The SHARK is way bigger sounding than you would guess for the price, and inside that sound you may find yourself involved with your music while the natural tones add to that phenomenon.

$109.90
https://penonaudio.com/Leteciel-Shark

Disclaimer:
The Leteciel SHARK IEM has had a week of burn-in.

Disclaimer:
I want to thank Penon Audio for the love and for the Leteciel SHARK Universal IEM review sample.

Disclaimer:
These are one person's ideas and concepts, your results may vary.

Equipment Used:
Sony WM1Z Walkman DAP MrWalkman’s Firmware 3.5mm
Sony WM1A Walkman DAP MrWalkman’s Firmware 3.5mm
Sony TA-ZH1ES DAC/AMP Firmware 1.03 3.5mm
Electra Glide Audio Reference Glide-Reference Standard "Fatboy" Power Cord
Sony Walkman Cradle BCR-NWH10
AudioQuest Carbon USB

New Penon PAC LStips: