Hi, can you please advise if there will be a noticeable improvement in sound quality when switching from se180 to Kann ultra?

Hi, can you please advise if there will be a noticeable improvement in sound quality when switching from se180 to Kann ultra?

Can you describe the difference in sound between these DAPs, mids, bass, stage, separation?

Thanks for the reply, what kind of headphones did you choose it for?

No, I haven't heard

No, they don't, but the midrange has a dip and I can hear it

Yes, it is.

I've been listening to them for half a year now and got used to them, I compared them and the dt 1770 on the same source, the Earmen Angel and 1770 produced much more bass, whereas on the T5 I found the resolution, soundstage and liveliness to be better, but the dynamics were very lacking. Maybe...

I find the T5 lacking in bass, unlike the dt 1770

You mean source selection?

I listened to hugo 2, I didn't like it.

I need a portable source

I originally listened to these headphones with the Earmen Angel, it was more powerful, gave a wider stage, larger images, deeper bass, but I was not satisfied with the fact that it gave sibilants. From this we can conclude that these headphones sound better with a more powerful source.

Thank you for your reply. I use a balanced connection on which 6 vrms are claimed, the volume level is 100 out of 150, though this is on classical music recordings with not very high recording levels. I have read that low impedance headphones are more demanding on current level than voltage...

I can't decide between kann ultra or se300, has anyone compared them?

Unfortunately no chance to compare with stationary equipment or other dap yet. I use a balanced connection with a sem 3 module

Hello, please advise on a DAP for beyerdynamic T5 3 generation. For instrumental music classical, jazz, rock. Now I have astell kern se 180, as I think it does not have enough power, the sound is flat, it lacks body, not much bass and treble sharp. I'm looking at astell kern kann ultra or se300