Search results for query: *
  • Users: rickn
  • Order by date
  1. rickn

    Beyerdynamic DT770 600 ohms Premium Appreciation!!!!!

    What are you guys using for amps? I have an RME Babyface. There a whole lot of volume/headroom in it, but it isn't anywhere near 600Ω impedance. It works great with the 250Ω DT-1990, but that's, ya know, about half.
  2. rickn

    Focal SPIRIT PROFESSIONAL Impressions thread

    Love to know how the modification turns out. I live the sound of the headphones, but hate the mechanical noise. I wondered if adding a headband pad would help. keep us posted oops. and forgot... They Beyerdynamic dt770 headband pad does not fit. Won't wrap around all the way and snap...
  3. rickn

    Focal SPIRIT PROFESSIONAL Impressions thread

    I might give those (Fisual S-Flex) a try. If I do, I'll pass on any good news.   r
  4. rickn

    Focal SPIRIT PROFESSIONAL Impressions thread

    Hey! I have the FSP, and for a lot of reasons I really like them. However, are you using the stock cables that came with them? If not, do you have a recommendation? I'm having a lot of trouble with acoustic noise when the cables hit anything (like a shirt). Any suggestions would be...
  5. rickn

    Focal SPIRIT PROFESSIONAL Impressions thread

    FSP overall Beautiful bass extension. very tight. Great isolation comfortable Can't speak for the purported mid-range hump, but it doesn't seem to be a problem. (I monitor on Genelec, Dynaudio and PMC. Occasionally on ATC. All of these but the ATC have their idiosyncrasies) Extremely...
  6. rickn

    Focal SPIRIT PROFESSIONAL Impressions thread

    THANK YOU!! I will try it. (neither of mine have a remote button, but I don't use them for the phone anyway)   Best Wishes,   r
  7. rickn

    Focal SPIRIT PROFESSIONAL Impressions thread

    I just sent this letter to Focal. I have had a pair of focal pro headphones now for a few months. First, I have to say, that the sound coming out of the speakers is excellent. No complaints. The cups fit and are comfortable. Here's the bad part. I can not comfortably recommend these to...
  8. rickn

    Non-microphonic re-cable??

    That's cool. The logic of the etymology says yes anyway. (there's nothing in the word indicating electrocoustics) So.... nothing about cables?   r
  9. rickn

    Non-microphonic re-cable??

    i wasn't sure I was using the right terminology. There's no electrical signal interference in my cables, only mechanical transduction. but I was using the term 'microphonic'. The post above (below?) indicated this is probably wrong and that electrical signal was a requirement where the term...
  10. rickn

    Non-microphonic re-cable??

    oh well. I'll figure something out. parbly delete it
  11. rickn

    Non-microphonic re-cable??

    so is a Shabbat microphone not actually a microphone, since it doesn't use electricity in any way?
  12. rickn

    Comment by 'rickn' in article 'Glossary Of Terms'

    how about 'microphonics' since that seems to be in dispute?
Back
Top