The order in which you connect the cables and operate the on/off switch determines whether it runs from battery or external power. This is shown in the manual. Apologies if this is not what you are asking.

Hi all. I'm returning to this thread to report that after a long break, using my iDSD from my computer, I returned to connecting it to my SB Touch and it just worked! The only difference is that i used a different and high-quality USB cable. So it might just have been a cable issue. Cheers...

Google for 'Bit-perfect playback foobar'. There are many tutorials. Basically, you have to stop Windows doing its own thing with the playback.

Thanks. Yes, I have tried both switching on first and switching on after connection. I'm just getting back to trying this again as I have been enjoying using it through my computer for a while. I'll post back with progress. Thanks again. Paul

Yup. Its definitely switched on. Since I posted I have verified on my pc that the DAC is working properly. Still won't work with sb touch.

Hi It's been a while since I've been on here and, selfishly, I'm back looking for some help. I've just acquired a nice, new iFi Nano iDSD BL and I want to use it with my Squeezebox Touch. The SB is already set up with EDO and works well into an SMSL DAC. I have made sure that the SB and EDO...

Hi It's been a while since I've been on here and, selfishly, I'm back looking for some help. I've just acquired a nice, new iFi Nano iDSD BL and I want to use it with my Squeezebox Touch. The SB is already set up with EDO and works well into an SMSL DAC. I have made sure that the SB and EDO...

Many thanks Looser101. I couldn't be sure from the first photograph, but it is all quite clear from what you have said. Order for the Zapfilter is going in today!

Wow - looks great. I think I am going to do this! Can you give more detail - words or pictures - re the input connections to the Zapfilter and where they are taken of the DAC board? Many thanks.

The original poster should take advice from anyone who has posted whose opinion he has previously agreed with. I did say 'to my ears', and, yes, the rest of the system will make a big difference. To me Monica is still 'thin', by which I mean that a certain dynamic quality has been lost and...

Quote: Originally Posted by Tachikoma Heh? I was expecting the reverse - the monica 2 being NOS and the Zhaolu an oversampling DAC, should mean the monica 2 losing out in detail but "warmer and richer" should be its forte, if anything. I did not find it so! The Monica seems to me...

Low output from Monica - Yes, definitely. I needed a significant advance of volume control compared to other sources. My valve/tube amp has about 80K input impedance. Your stated preference makes me think that you would prefer the Monica. I think both DACs will give you the detail you seek...

I have used both DACs. For my ears, the Zhaolu, in it's Eddie-modded 'Blackgate' version with the Crystal DAC is far superior to the Monica. It's difficult to give advice as our tastes may differ but I found the Monica thin and cold sounding. The Zhaolu seemed to be rich while still...

How about and idiot's guide on how to connect a zapfilter to the Zhaolu? Thanks

A question if may please. Does anyone know the voltages across the 4 Muse Bi-Polar coupling caps into the Op Amps and the 3 Muse Bi-Polar caps on the DAC board? I am after the actual voltages not the voltage ratings, as I would like to know if 6.3v caps would be a safe substitute. TIA!

Quote: Originally Posted by Sean H Yes, it's not grounded. It's fairly common though in higher end audio digital gear. I'm not passing any sound-related comment here. All I am saying is that If you are in the UK, you MUST earth the chassis because it is not double-insulated. It is...

Quote: Originally Posted by regal Has this been discussed? How does one find this mains socket earth tag? My understanding of 'the rules' is that there has to be two complete layers of insulation between high voltage and our tender bits OR there has to be a contiguous earthed...

I use a DAC-AH with my SB3. For me it is a big improvement. To my ears the DAC-AH has a warmer, richer sound with no loss of detail.

I have SB3 and Zhaolu D2 and there is no noise problem or spurious muting on either input.

Hi Eddie seems to offer a lot of things which are not on his web site! What are these fascinating tubular thingies and what are you going to do with them?

Quote: Originally Posted by audioneophyte EDIT: This post seems to be talking about the lack of chassis ground: http://www.world-designs.co.uk/forum...3&postcount=15 Does this make sense? Hi I am that same Global! In the World Design post I was referring to a safety issue...

I have them both and I am trying to decide at the moment. I am certain that the Zhaolu is more accurate and its detail retrieval seems superior.... ..and yet there is something (coloured, inaccurate perhaps) completely addictive about the DAC-AH. It seems to give more presence, more 'you...

Thanks for all the info folks! My "49.142" was a typo - should have been "49.152". I have great difficulty with digital circuits - don't really understand them, esp. without circuit diagram. I don't suppose one is available anywhere? I should concentrate on the analogue side for a while...

Quote: Originally Posted by udo My D2.0 has a CS board with improved clock (would have to look up the ppm `score`...). Thanks Udo Did this come with your DAC? Did you get it from Eddie? I would have opted for this if I had seen it on his Web Site. Maybe I have it anyway. The...

Hi I'm new here and although I've tried to read everything about the various Zhaolu mods, I may have missed something - so bear with me please. Has anyone tried an improved clock on the Zhaolu 2.0? The standard crystal should be 'improvable' but it uses an unusually high frequency and the...