You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
-
-
OO11111 replied to the thread aptX Adaptive / aptX Lossless USB Transmitters.From what I remember, Xiaomi and Nothing use very old LHDCv5 libraries. I believe some BBK phones may have newer library with lossless...
-
OO11111 replied to the thread aptX Adaptive / aptX Lossless USB Transmitters.Fro what I know, that protocol is called MHDT (Mediatek High Datarate Transfer or something like that). They already did more than a...
-
OO11111 replied to the thread aptX Adaptive / aptX Lossless USB Transmitters.Unlikely, but you'd better ask Asus. And since Asus doesn't allow to unlock the bootloader anymore, it's not possible to add it by...
-
OO11111 replied to the thread aptX Adaptive / aptX Lossless USB Transmitters.It's kind of both. There are some hardware requirements for lossless (namely, QHS aka Qualcomm Bluetooth High-Speed Link), but it's also...
-
OO11111 replied to the thread aptX Adaptive / aptX Lossless USB Transmitters.Which is funny because these are actually the same aptX Adaptive R3 codec under the hood.
-
OO11111 replied to the thread aptX Adaptive / aptX Lossless USB Transmitters.Run sudo getprop persist.vendor.qcom.bluetooth.aptxadaptiver2_2_support in Termux. Might work from "adb shell" as well. Based on this...
-
OO11111 replied to the thread aptX Adaptive / aptX Lossless USB Transmitters.Not sure, I haven't looked into the spec. What I can say is that LC3plus can be used everywhere instead of the LC3 as the formats are...
-
OO11111 replied to the thread aptX Adaptive / aptX Lossless USB Transmitters.In short, that's bs inaccurate. I won't go into much details here, but as far as I understand, it's not compatible in any way meaningful...
-
OO11111 replied to the thread aptX Adaptive / aptX Lossless USB Transmitters.It's complicated. LDAC is considerably better in some aspects (i.e. there's an official open-source encoder implementation and even an...
-
OO11111 replied to the thread aptX Adaptive / aptX Lossless USB Transmitters.No: But any aptX Adaptive R2.2 device is. Usually it's 8 Gen 1 and newer, unless manufacturer decided to disable it (yes, I'm talking...
-
OO11111 replied to the thread aptX Adaptive / aptX Lossless USB Transmitters.We've been maxed out for years. Most math behind these codecs dates back centuries ago, so this isn't surprising. FLAC was released 23...
-
OO11111 replied to the thread aptX Adaptive / aptX Lossless USB Transmitters.No, you should ask for green pill instead 😄 The only revision which matters now is R4 and it's not even about sound quality. There is...
-
OO11111 replied to the thread aptX Adaptive / aptX Lossless USB Transmitters.There's no aptX Lossless. It's just a marketing name for aptX Adaptive R2.2 and nothing more. Very simple: it usually isn't. Only 7x...
-
OO11111 replied to the thread aptX Adaptive / aptX Lossless USB Transmitters.This is old news. It's actually quite easy to confirm this by looking into how aptX Adaptive is actually implemented in Android or by...
-
OO11111 replied to the thread aptX Adaptive / aptX Lossless USB Transmitters.And how you checked the codec? I used Qualcomm internal tools (pydbg and QACT) and both have shown that aptX Adaptive was used...
-
-
Loading…
-
Loading…
-
Loading…
-
Loading…
-
Loading…