Recent content by MariusAB

If it was question for me then with btr 17 and everywhere i can i use i use balanced output. With btr17 single ended is still not touched, no cable touched it as i don't see the need. Balanced has better power output. And even if p7 not necessary need big power, but it still give me better...

From all i heard should be king and even better than mp145 and ofcourse 143. Interesting you haven't heard the first timeless to compare? Looking at your big quantity of audio gear you have used heard.

I only using aful 5+2+btr 17 for me it is very amazing combo so can imagine cantor also very very good. Before i was worried if btr 17 will be too technical or bright but it came very well. as this source is very revealing and detailed but not too dry more neutral.

Has anyone here have tried 7hz timeless 2 planar iem or planning yo get.? For me as original timeless owner it is very interesting. O Perhaps plannning to get them. As already some said there are some improvement, especially in timbre, more natural treble.

Really enjoyed your first experience and happy that you at last got timeless so can experience why we liked this model, even if second generation is already upgraded, but i believe it has much dna from the first timeless. Only some areas should be improved. That's why i am trying to understand...

So timeless already shipping ? I see only preorder on linsoul. Anyway really really waited for some first real units to reach someones hands. Planar king is back. As i still use frequently first timeless and still love it after so much time will wait a little for someone who has it to also...

Nice nice, good source then for such iem. If listening rock is not too bright then it is good combination. Perhaps will get it for my performer also. And even not in desktop mode you get such a good power. That's good to hear. I like when source has good quality power left. Does btr17...

It not a trap but your expectation is unrealistic perhaps :) What difference you want to hear ? Its clean, good source as many other, but only source change can't give you big difference because the headphones is the biggest change not dac or amp. Going from basic integrated motherboard chip...

How is the sound with this combination? Isn't too bright or shouty in treble region? And how btr17 is enough as a source for cantor?

That's completely understandable and as usually very technically competent iems and such sound cost not cheap. But even with relatively cheap iems as aful 7 i get very good technicalities so i only can imagine what cantor brings here. As i understand it is detail monster. For very good price /...

At its price it should be good :) i only afraid of cantor to be overly detailed and separating and technical to not enjoy it for music a a whole. But perhaps it is not what imagine

I should get more shorter tips for testing for this goal. I don't know how flush this iem should be in the ear as now it protrudes outside more than other, but i will experiment more. I should say today even with tips i have and azla short wide it is more smooth, perhaps i am getting used to...

Thanks, i will try to get more sources to check as overall i really like this tip. Seems like my dap could be more linear as i noticed it boosting and making a little more sibilant with other iems. Because my goal is the same as yours to get good lower end and calm down or not enhance 6 - 7 k...