Grizzleberry's latest activity
-
GNo that's how I'd describe it. Keep in mind this isn't a thing that's well-defined, and while I can describe it in various audiophile...
-
GNot yet. Yeah the mm-500 doesn't sound like it has as much upper mid 'glare' as the LCD-5. It's still a bit much 3khz for me but the...
-
GI remove the cable after every use for storage, and am coming up on 5 years ownership. I have no issue with the sockets, they’re great.
-
GYes, I've been thinking the same thing. It's interesting how close they measure and how different they sound.
-
GHere's Resolves measurements compared to LCD5:
-
GAgree with this. The LCD5 got me into EQ. I did like the clarity of leading edges at first, but yeah, overtime, the upper mids sounded...
-
GYeah, to me too but once tamed, the mids are just so delicious that I went from basshead to midrange lover. No phone should cost that...
-
GLike everything else it’s worth what people are willing to pay for it. Price to performance is not a linear scale. In my opinion...
-
GIt is mostly just me. To me the LCD-5 is painfully shouty. I scoop out at 1.5kHz and add a bass shelf at 87Hz EDIT: Also, it is not...
-
GI am scared to hear it with the LCD-5, because the FR is painful without EQ.
-
GLoved the graphical EQ component back in the 80s/90s. My uncle had one, and it seemed pretty standard back then for people with a Hi-Fi...
-
GGrizzleberry reacted to TheFrator's post in the thread Audeze LCD-5 Review, Measurements, Interview with Like.Detail is an ignorance is bliss type situation. Can't know what you're missing if you've never experienced it before.
-
GGrizzleberry reacted to mikecheck95's post in the thread Audeze LCD-5 Review, Measurements, Interview with Like.I think it’s easy for people early in their audio journey to dismiss the idea of technical performance because they have not experienced...
-
GI have had my LCD4 the longest of any I have. I demoed the 5 for a week, and while I can appreciate its technical ability, the tuning...
-
GThe LCD-4 is just delicious.