Well, Chastity ran a udial test and the mighty Audigy4 failed. So the CS ASRC chip is prolly used only for input... Linky

Quote: Originally Posted by Publius To those of you shaking your heads, it is not at all inane to ask if CD-TEXT introduces distortion. It's conceivable the information could be transmitted in-band, ie like how HDCD squeezes a few more bits out of RBCD, or watermarking: by encoding it...

1212m is the least colored, most detailed sound card I've heard. But I didn't hear that many, so YMMV. The usual complaint is that the 1212m is too analytical. Hearing that someone complains it's colored is a first.

Quote: Originally Posted by dallasstar No, I reread the review. Apparently, Creative told them that the card has crappy inputs, but the output is much better than Audigy 2. So maybe it's not that bad after all. The loopback method won't work with this Audigy. Crappy inputs make...

With all those CS4398 DACs, CS8420 ASRC and it's still bad? If they've "saved" on the clocking circuitry it would be truly stupid. Maybe the fokes at extremetech missed something, like a bad loopback cable. You won't hit the advertised measurements for 1212m with just any cable, so the same...

Quote: Originally Posted by NeilPeart I've begun the search for un-locked DVD-A media. <<SNIP>> EDIT: I just bought PowerDVD 6 Deluxe and it does indeed allow un-molested DVD-A digital out to my DAC1! Is there a list of such recordings? If not, perhaps it's time to start one in...

Quote: Originally Posted by juni0r Aureal A3D. Something so damn good that it was barred from many amateur and pro gaming leagues (at least in Half-Life related games)...haha Are you serious? I'm not following the pro gaming "scene".

Quote: Originally Posted by juni0r I consider myself as a pretty reliable source for gaming (I've competed and won a $2000 CDN Day of Defeat tournament and I work with/for Team 3D, arguably the model for professional gaming teams) and I can say that without a doubt headphones are much...

Quote: Originally Posted by Eagle_Driver This assumes that you're using a 16/44.1 audio file and having the Audigy resample that to 16/48. And sure, it doesn't do that resampling right. And even 16/48 files that aren't resampled will sound rather mediocre on the Audigys due to the fact...

Quote: Originally Posted by simplelife In short, noise-shaping/dither (SBM, etc) frequency domain; HDCD amplitude domain. Think easier and refer to page 13 of that pdf, the Low Level section. Why do HDCD gain/attenuate amplitude of low level signal? Your comments clearly...

Quote: Originally Posted by j-curve I've no idea how to derive the boundary condition but at least I now understand how the Toshiba comes up with 181 for the first sample when the disc data says 27. From what I know CD-A does not define the exact start of the disc. So different...

Quote: Originally Posted by Glassman you guys should burn a dirac impulse onto a CD-RW and record it digitally from the toshiba, you'll get the exact filter response.. From my fading memory of digital filters: only if it is FIR. You won't be able to get the IIR that way. The Dirac...

Quote: Originally Posted by simplelife First of all, let me sincerely apologize you for the post i made. I should not be saying that. It's just plain stupid, childish and uncalled for. No worries, no offense taken. Quote: The post i should have made is that before...

Quote: Originally Posted by simplelife Although, i don't care much about HDCD myself, i find your statement really bold especially coming from someone who just recently discovered its whitepaper via google. The PDF is only a proof that you never read or understand your own...

Wodgy, you are probably right. The nanophon paper I linked was about digital filters, yet nobody seems to have noticed. CosmoKramer, "faster" was a misquote of mine for lan's "more lively" (dam' it's the second time I do something that). Ask him what "more lively" means. I never listened...